Contrasting environmental impacts of nano-biochar and conventional biochar on various organisms.

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-20 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177629
Monika Raczkiewicz, Aleksandra Bogusz, Bo Pan, Baoshan Xing, Patryk Oleszczuk
{"title":"Contrasting environmental impacts of nano-biochar and conventional biochar on various organisms.","authors":"Monika Raczkiewicz, Aleksandra Bogusz, Bo Pan, Baoshan Xing, Patryk Oleszczuk","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The environmental hazards of nanobiochar (n-BC) require attention due to limited knowledge. This study is the first to explore the effects of biochar size reduction across various organisms, including bacteria (Allivibrio fischeri), plants (Lemna minor, Lepidium sativum), and invertebrates (Daphnia magna, Folsomia candida). Bulk biochar (b-BC) and n-BC were applied in both liquid and solid-phase tests to assess their ecotoxicity. The resulting leachates were tested at concentrations of 2, 10, and 100 mg/L on organisms such as Daphnia magna and Lemna minor. In the solid-phase tests, b-BC and n-BC were added to the OECD soil at concentrations of 1 % and 5 % to evaluate toxicity in Folsomia candida and at concentrations of 1 % to evaluate toxicity in Lepidium sativum. We found n-BC to be significantly more toxic (by 18 % to 2886 %) to A. fischeri than b-BC, with toxicity increasing over time. Low doses (1 %) of both b-BC and n-BC did not cause mortality or inhibit reproduction in F. candida, though b-BC enhanced reproduction (by 30 % to 56 %) compared to n-BC. At a 5 % dose, both b-BC and n-BC inhibited reproduction F. candida, with n-BC being 0.5 to 1.8 times more toxic. Neither b-BC nor n-BC immobilized D. magna, but both inhibited reproduction (by 28 % to 35 %). The nanoscale dimensions of n-BC facilitated bioaccumulation in D. magna, leading to adhesion on the organism's body. The n-BC had a greater impact on plants, both b-BC and n-BC were non-toxic to L. minor, but all n-BC inhibited root growth in L. sativum. These findings highlight the importance of considering biochar size, feedstock, and pyrolysis conditions when evaluating environmental risks, ensuring safe use in sustainable agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"177629"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental hazards of nanobiochar (n-BC) require attention due to limited knowledge. This study is the first to explore the effects of biochar size reduction across various organisms, including bacteria (Allivibrio fischeri), plants (Lemna minor, Lepidium sativum), and invertebrates (Daphnia magna, Folsomia candida). Bulk biochar (b-BC) and n-BC were applied in both liquid and solid-phase tests to assess their ecotoxicity. The resulting leachates were tested at concentrations of 2, 10, and 100 mg/L on organisms such as Daphnia magna and Lemna minor. In the solid-phase tests, b-BC and n-BC were added to the OECD soil at concentrations of 1 % and 5 % to evaluate toxicity in Folsomia candida and at concentrations of 1 % to evaluate toxicity in Lepidium sativum. We found n-BC to be significantly more toxic (by 18 % to 2886 %) to A. fischeri than b-BC, with toxicity increasing over time. Low doses (1 %) of both b-BC and n-BC did not cause mortality or inhibit reproduction in F. candida, though b-BC enhanced reproduction (by 30 % to 56 %) compared to n-BC. At a 5 % dose, both b-BC and n-BC inhibited reproduction F. candida, with n-BC being 0.5 to 1.8 times more toxic. Neither b-BC nor n-BC immobilized D. magna, but both inhibited reproduction (by 28 % to 35 %). The nanoscale dimensions of n-BC facilitated bioaccumulation in D. magna, leading to adhesion on the organism's body. The n-BC had a greater impact on plants, both b-BC and n-BC were non-toxic to L. minor, but all n-BC inhibited root growth in L. sativum. These findings highlight the importance of considering biochar size, feedstock, and pyrolysis conditions when evaluating environmental risks, ensuring safe use in sustainable agriculture.

对比纳米生物炭和传统生物炭对各种生物的环境影响。
由于知识有限,纳米生物炭(n-BC)对环境的危害需要引起重视。本研究首次探讨了生物炭尺寸缩小对各种生物的影响,包括细菌(Allivibrio fischeri)、植物(Lemna minor、Lepidium sativum)和无脊椎动物(大型蚤、Folsomia candida)。在液相和固相试验中使用了块状生物炭(b-BC)和正生化炭,以评估其生态毒性。在 2、10 和 100 毫克/升的浓度下,对大型蚤(Daphnia magna)和小蚤(Lemna minor)等生物进行了沥滤液测试。在固相测试中,在 OECD 土壤中加入浓度为 1 % 和 5 % 的 b-BC 和 n-BC,以评估对 Folsomia candida 的毒性,以及浓度为 1 % 的 Lepidium sativum 的毒性。我们发现,n-BC 对 A. fischeri 的毒性(18% 至 2886%)明显高于散装生物炭(b-BC),而且毒性会随着时间的推移而增加。低剂量(1%)的 b-BC 和 n-BC 不会导致念珠菌死亡或抑制其繁殖,但与 n-BC 相比,b-BC 会增强其繁殖能力(30% 到 56%)。在 5% 的剂量下,b-BC 和 n-BC 都能抑制念珠菌的繁殖,其中 n-BC 的毒性是其毒性的 0.5-1.8 倍。b-BC和n-BC都不能固定D. magna,但都能抑制其繁殖(抑制28%到35%)。n-BC 的纳米级尺寸有利于在大型蚤体内的生物累积,从而导致在生物体内的附着。n-BC 对植物的影响更大,b-BC 和 n-BC 对 L. minor 无毒,但所有 n-BC 都会抑制 L. sativum 的根系生长。这些发现强调了在评估环境风险时考虑生物炭大小、原料和热解条件的重要性,从而确保在可持续农业中的安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信