{"title":"An Improved Scheme for the Finite Difference Approximation of the Advective Term in the Heat or Solute Transport Equations","authors":"Jordi Petchamé-Guerrero, Jesus Carrera","doi":"10.1007/s11242-024-02133-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transport equations are widely used to describe the evolution of scalar quantities subject to advection, dispersion and, possibly, reactions. Numerical methods are required to solve these equations in applications, adopting either the advective or conservative formulations. Conservative formulations are usually preferred in practice because they conserve mass. Advective formulations do not, but have received more mathematical attention and are required for Lagrangian solution methods. To obtain an advective formulation that conserves mass, we subtract the discretized fluid flow equation, multiplied by concentration, from the conservative form of the transport equation. The resulting scheme not only conserves mass, but is also elegant in that it can be interpreted as averaging the advective term at cell interfaces, instead of approximating it at cell centers as in traditional centered schemes. The two schemes are identical when fluid velocity is constant, and both have second-order convergence, but the truncation errors are slightly different. We argue that the error terms appearing in the proposed scheme actually imply an improved representation of subgrid spreading/contraction and acceleration/deceleration caused by variable velocity. We compare the proposed and traditional schemes on several problems with variable velocity caused by recharge, discharge or evaporation, including two newly developed analytical solutions. The proposed method yields results that are slightly, but consistently, better than the traditional scheme, while always conserving mass (i.e., mass at the end equals mass at the beginning plus inputs minus outputs), which the traditional centered finite differences scheme does not. We conclude that this scheme should be preferred in finite difference solutions of transport.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":804,"journal":{"name":"Transport in Porous Media","volume":"151 15","pages":"2795 - 2817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11242-024-02133-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport in Porous Media","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11242-024-02133-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transport equations are widely used to describe the evolution of scalar quantities subject to advection, dispersion and, possibly, reactions. Numerical methods are required to solve these equations in applications, adopting either the advective or conservative formulations. Conservative formulations are usually preferred in practice because they conserve mass. Advective formulations do not, but have received more mathematical attention and are required for Lagrangian solution methods. To obtain an advective formulation that conserves mass, we subtract the discretized fluid flow equation, multiplied by concentration, from the conservative form of the transport equation. The resulting scheme not only conserves mass, but is also elegant in that it can be interpreted as averaging the advective term at cell interfaces, instead of approximating it at cell centers as in traditional centered schemes. The two schemes are identical when fluid velocity is constant, and both have second-order convergence, but the truncation errors are slightly different. We argue that the error terms appearing in the proposed scheme actually imply an improved representation of subgrid spreading/contraction and acceleration/deceleration caused by variable velocity. We compare the proposed and traditional schemes on several problems with variable velocity caused by recharge, discharge or evaporation, including two newly developed analytical solutions. The proposed method yields results that are slightly, but consistently, better than the traditional scheme, while always conserving mass (i.e., mass at the end equals mass at the beginning plus inputs minus outputs), which the traditional centered finite differences scheme does not. We conclude that this scheme should be preferred in finite difference solutions of transport.
期刊介绍:
-Publishes original research on physical, chemical, and biological aspects of transport in porous media-
Papers on porous media research may originate in various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering)-
Emphasizes theory, (numerical) modelling, laboratory work, and non-routine applications-
Publishes work of a fundamental nature, of interest to a wide readership, that provides novel insight into porous media processes-
Expanded in 2007 from 12 to 15 issues per year.
Transport in Porous Media publishes original research on physical and chemical aspects of transport phenomena in rigid and deformable porous media. These phenomena, occurring in single and multiphase flow in porous domains, can be governed by extensive quantities such as mass of a fluid phase, mass of component of a phase, momentum, or energy. Moreover, porous medium deformations can be induced by the transport phenomena, by chemical and electro-chemical activities such as swelling, or by external loading through forces and displacements. These porous media phenomena may be studied by researchers from various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering).