Combination of ozonation with GAC, AIX and biochar post-treatment for removal of pharmaceuticals and transformation products from municipal WWTP effluent†

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Malhun Fakioglu, Oksana Golovko, Christian Baresel, Lutz Ahrens and Izzet Ozturk
{"title":"Combination of ozonation with GAC, AIX and biochar post-treatment for removal of pharmaceuticals and transformation products from municipal WWTP effluent†","authors":"Malhun Fakioglu, Oksana Golovko, Christian Baresel, Lutz Ahrens and Izzet Ozturk","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00702F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Pharmaceuticals have been detected in water and wastewater, resulting in increasing research attention towards the elimination of these substances from aqueous environments. Due to the limitations of conventional processes in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to fully eliminate these compounds, more research is needed on complementary advanced treatment technologies. This study aims to examine the removal efficiency for 24 selected pharmaceuticals and the fate of their 7 main metabolites including several oxidation transformation products by various technique combinations applied on the effluent from a full-scale WWTP. Investigated treatment options include ozonation (O<small><sub>3</sub></small>) combined with either granular activated carbon (GAC), two different types of biochar, and anion exchange (AIX) in a continuously operated laboratory-scale system. The average removal of analyzed pharmaceuticals ranged between 8.8–97% with an O<small><sub>3</sub></small> dose of 0.28 g O<small><sub>3</sub></small>/g DOC (dissolved organic carbon), whereas it ranged from 86–99% for higher O<small><sub>3</sub></small> dosages (0.96 and 2.17 g O<small><sub>3</sub></small>/g DOC). Overall, the investigated metabolites of pharmaceuticals exhibited lower removal efficiency (between −33 and 99%) with ozone compared to the parent compounds at all O<small><sub>3</sub></small>-dosages. Concentrations of oxidation transformation products such as citalopram <em>N</em>-oxide were increased after ozone treatment, whereas it was decreased after the columns at different rates. The bromate concentrations during all three O<small><sub>3</sub></small>-dosages (0.28, 0.96 and 2.17 g O<small><sub>3</sub></small>/g DOC) were below 5 μg L<small><sup>−1</sup></small>. GAC was the best performing sorbent among all materials, where even after two weeks of continuous operation, nearly all compounds were removed below quantification levels. Although biochar 1 showed better performance (30–89%, mean = 68%) than biochar 2 (8.5–82%, mean = 38%), both sorption materials showed reduced sorption capacity over the time period of two weeks for most of the target compounds. On the other hand, AIX had lower removal rates ranging between 2–55% (mean = 20%). Regarding the combination of O<small><sub>3</sub></small> with the individual sorbent materials, GAC was the most successful combination with O<small><sub>3</sub></small> for the removal of pharmaceuticals (&gt;99%) and oxidation transformation products (&gt;60%). The combination of O<small><sub>3</sub></small> with biochar 1 was more successful (mean = 91%) than the combination with biochar 2 (mean = 79%), where the combination of O<small><sub>3</sub></small> with AIX showed the lowest removal rates (mean = 58%).</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 12","pages":" 3249-3262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00702f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals have been detected in water and wastewater, resulting in increasing research attention towards the elimination of these substances from aqueous environments. Due to the limitations of conventional processes in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to fully eliminate these compounds, more research is needed on complementary advanced treatment technologies. This study aims to examine the removal efficiency for 24 selected pharmaceuticals and the fate of their 7 main metabolites including several oxidation transformation products by various technique combinations applied on the effluent from a full-scale WWTP. Investigated treatment options include ozonation (O3) combined with either granular activated carbon (GAC), two different types of biochar, and anion exchange (AIX) in a continuously operated laboratory-scale system. The average removal of analyzed pharmaceuticals ranged between 8.8–97% with an O3 dose of 0.28 g O3/g DOC (dissolved organic carbon), whereas it ranged from 86–99% for higher O3 dosages (0.96 and 2.17 g O3/g DOC). Overall, the investigated metabolites of pharmaceuticals exhibited lower removal efficiency (between −33 and 99%) with ozone compared to the parent compounds at all O3-dosages. Concentrations of oxidation transformation products such as citalopram N-oxide were increased after ozone treatment, whereas it was decreased after the columns at different rates. The bromate concentrations during all three O3-dosages (0.28, 0.96 and 2.17 g O3/g DOC) were below 5 μg L−1. GAC was the best performing sorbent among all materials, where even after two weeks of continuous operation, nearly all compounds were removed below quantification levels. Although biochar 1 showed better performance (30–89%, mean = 68%) than biochar 2 (8.5–82%, mean = 38%), both sorption materials showed reduced sorption capacity over the time period of two weeks for most of the target compounds. On the other hand, AIX had lower removal rates ranging between 2–55% (mean = 20%). Regarding the combination of O3 with the individual sorbent materials, GAC was the most successful combination with O3 for the removal of pharmaceuticals (>99%) and oxidation transformation products (>60%). The combination of O3 with biochar 1 was more successful (mean = 91%) than the combination with biochar 2 (mean = 79%), where the combination of O3 with AIX showed the lowest removal rates (mean = 58%).

Abstract Image

将臭氧处理与 GAC、AIX 和生物炭后处理相结合,去除市政污水处理厂污水中的药物和转化产物†。
由于在水和废水中检测到了药物,消除水环境中这些物质的研究日益受到关注。由于污水处理厂(WWTPs)的传统工艺无法完全消除这些化合物,因此需要对先进的辅助处理技术进行更多的研究。本研究旨在通过各种技术组合,对污水处理厂的出水进行处理,以检测 24 种选定药物的去除效率及其 7 种主要代谢产物(包括几种氧化转化产物)的去向。研究的处理方案包括在一个连续运行的实验室规模系统中将臭氧(O3)与颗粒活性炭(GAC)、两种不同类型的生物炭和阴离子交换(AIX)相结合。O3 剂量为 0.28 g O3/g DOC(溶解有机碳)时,分析药物的平均去除率在 8.8-97% 之间,而 O3 剂量较高(0.96 和 2.17 g O3/g DOC)时,去除率在 86-99% 之间。总体而言,与母体化合物相比,所调查的药物代谢物在所有 O3 剂量下的臭氧去除率都较低(-33% 到 99%)。氧化转化产物(如西酞普兰 N-氧化物)的浓度在臭氧处理后有所增加,而在色谱柱处理后则以不同的速率下降。在所有三种臭氧剂量(0.28、0.96 和 2.17 g O3/g DOC)下,溴酸盐的浓度均低于 5 μg L-1。在所有材料中,GAC 是性能最好的吸附剂,即使连续运行两周,几乎所有化合物的去除率都低于定量水平。虽然生物炭 1 的性能(30-89%,平均值 = 68%)优于生物炭 2(8.5-82%,平均值 = 38%),但在两周的时间内,两种吸附材料对大多数目标化合物的吸附能力都有所下降。另一方面,AIX 的去除率较低,在 2-55% 之间(平均值 = 20%)。关于 O3 与各种吸附材料的组合,GAC 与 O3 的组合在去除药物(99%)和氧化转化产物(60%)方面最为成功。O3 与生物炭 1 的组合(平均值 = 91%)比与生物炭 2 的组合(平均值 = 79%)更成功,而 O3 与 AIX 的组合的去除率最低(平均值 = 58%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信