How Does Technological Crowding Affect Exploratory Innovation? Considering the Moderating Role of Technological Superiority

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Chia-Chi Chang;Phuong-Dung Thi Nguyen
{"title":"How Does Technological Crowding Affect Exploratory Innovation? Considering the Moderating Role of Technological Superiority","authors":"Chia-Chi Chang;Phuong-Dung Thi Nguyen","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3485235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article anchors itself in knowledge network theory and rivalry theory to explore the antecedents of exploration by examining the possibility of technological crowding, that is, a firm position in crowded technological fields, as the enabler of firms’ exploratory innovation performance. For this purpose, we adopted regression analysis for panel data with fixed effects and considered the data of 4100 firm-year observations of Taiwanese listed companies in the electronics industry from 2000 to 2021. The findings suggest that technological crowding urges firms to pursue exploration to ease heightened competition intensity and crowd out their competitors. Recalling the literature on the competency trap phenomenon in which some dominant firms may exhibit technological superiority underperformance, we further propose that the dark side of technological superiority is more visible when firms are positioned in crowded technological areas. Specifically, firms with stronger combinatorial capabilities or greater technological prestige refrain from investing in exploration because they are tied with high couplings between their homogeneous knowledge elements and indulge themselves in existing success. Our findings remain robust after adjusting the window of research and using the negative binomial regression with fixed effects based on the alternative measure of exploratory innovation. This article contributes significantly to the literature on technological position and knowledge networks by shedding light on the critical role of technological crowding in propelling firms’ exploration efforts. Our results also offer significant implications for executives in dominant firms and policymakers to become more aware of the competency trap and seek ways to span technological boundaries.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"15390-15404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10730801/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article anchors itself in knowledge network theory and rivalry theory to explore the antecedents of exploration by examining the possibility of technological crowding, that is, a firm position in crowded technological fields, as the enabler of firms’ exploratory innovation performance. For this purpose, we adopted regression analysis for panel data with fixed effects and considered the data of 4100 firm-year observations of Taiwanese listed companies in the electronics industry from 2000 to 2021. The findings suggest that technological crowding urges firms to pursue exploration to ease heightened competition intensity and crowd out their competitors. Recalling the literature on the competency trap phenomenon in which some dominant firms may exhibit technological superiority underperformance, we further propose that the dark side of technological superiority is more visible when firms are positioned in crowded technological areas. Specifically, firms with stronger combinatorial capabilities or greater technological prestige refrain from investing in exploration because they are tied with high couplings between their homogeneous knowledge elements and indulge themselves in existing success. Our findings remain robust after adjusting the window of research and using the negative binomial regression with fixed effects based on the alternative measure of exploratory innovation. This article contributes significantly to the literature on technological position and knowledge networks by shedding light on the critical role of technological crowding in propelling firms’ exploration efforts. Our results also offer significant implications for executives in dominant firms and policymakers to become more aware of the competency trap and seek ways to span technological boundaries.
技术排挤如何影响探索性创新?考虑技术优势的调节作用
本文立足于知识网络理论和竞争理论,通过研究技术拥挤(即企业在拥挤的技术领域中的地位)作为企业探索性创新绩效的促进因素的可能性,来探讨探索性创新的前因。为此,我们采用了固定效应的面板数据回归分析,并考虑了 2000 年至 2021 年台湾电子行业上市公司的 4100 个公司年观测数据。研究结果表明,技术挤占促使企业进行探索,以缓解竞争强度的提高并排挤竞争对手。回顾有关 "能力陷阱"(competency trap)现象的文献,其中一些占主导地位的企业可能会表现出技术优势表现不佳,我们进一步提出,当企业处于拥挤的技术领域时,技术优势的阴暗面会更加明显。具体来说,具有更强组合能力或更高技术声望的企业会因为同质知识要素之间的高度耦合而放弃投资探索,并沉溺于已有的成功。在调整研究窗口和使用基于探索性创新替代衡量标准的固定效应负二项回归后,我们的研究结果依然稳健。本文揭示了技术挤占在推动企业探索努力中的关键作用,为有关技术地位和知识网络的文献做出了重要贡献。我们的研究结果还为主导企业的高管和政策制定者提供了重要启示,使他们更加意识到能力陷阱,并寻求跨越技术边界的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信