The Influence of Using a Seismically Inferred Magma Reservoir Geometry in a Volcano Deformation Model for Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
J. Dibben, J. Hickey, K. Pascal, M. Paulatto
{"title":"The Influence of Using a Seismically Inferred Magma Reservoir Geometry in a Volcano Deformation Model for Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat","authors":"J. Dibben, J. Hickey, K. Pascal, M. Paulatto","doi":"10.1029/2024jb030102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volcano deformation models contribute to hazard assessment by simulating magma system dynamics. Traditional magma reservoir pressure source shape assumptions often fail to replicate irregular, geophysically identified geometries. Uncertainties regarding the influence of reservoir geometry can limit the effectiveness of using deformation models to decipher unrest signals. Here, we aim to determine the feasibility of using a magma reservoir geometry directly derived from a seismic tomography survey in a volcano deformation model for Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. Three-dimensional deformation models are created to simulate displacement using a pressure source geometry constrained from a low seismic velocity anomaly, inferred to be a region of partial melt, and contrasted against a traditional ellipsoid reservoir geometry. We also test a “hybrid” model combining a seismically inferred reservoir upper geometry and ellipsoidal base. Results of each model are evaluated against ground displacement observed on Montserrat from 2010 to 2022. Our results show that different reservoir geometries change the horizontal and vertical displacement fields across the island: the ellipsoid reservoir best reproduces vertical displacement magnitude, while the hybrid reservoirs best simulate horizontal displacement vectors and the region of maximum uplift. Overall, the ellipsoid-shaped reservoir provides our best-fit to the observed data, but we note this result could be biased due to prior years of optimization helping constrain the ellipsoid shape, size, and location. Our results show the potential for further use of geophysically constrained reservoir geometries in deformation modeling, and our methods could be applied to other deforming volcanoes worldwide.","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volcano deformation models contribute to hazard assessment by simulating magma system dynamics. Traditional magma reservoir pressure source shape assumptions often fail to replicate irregular, geophysically identified geometries. Uncertainties regarding the influence of reservoir geometry can limit the effectiveness of using deformation models to decipher unrest signals. Here, we aim to determine the feasibility of using a magma reservoir geometry directly derived from a seismic tomography survey in a volcano deformation model for Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. Three-dimensional deformation models are created to simulate displacement using a pressure source geometry constrained from a low seismic velocity anomaly, inferred to be a region of partial melt, and contrasted against a traditional ellipsoid reservoir geometry. We also test a “hybrid” model combining a seismically inferred reservoir upper geometry and ellipsoidal base. Results of each model are evaluated against ground displacement observed on Montserrat from 2010 to 2022. Our results show that different reservoir geometries change the horizontal and vertical displacement fields across the island: the ellipsoid reservoir best reproduces vertical displacement magnitude, while the hybrid reservoirs best simulate horizontal displacement vectors and the region of maximum uplift. Overall, the ellipsoid-shaped reservoir provides our best-fit to the observed data, but we note this result could be biased due to prior years of optimization helping constrain the ellipsoid shape, size, and location. Our results show the potential for further use of geophysically constrained reservoir geometries in deformation modeling, and our methods could be applied to other deforming volcanoes worldwide.
在蒙特塞拉特苏弗里耶尔山火山变形模型中使用地震推断岩浆储层几何形状的影响
火山变形模型通过模拟岩浆系统的动态变化,有助于进行危害评估。传统的岩浆储层压力源形状假设往往无法复制不规则的、地球物理确定的几何形状。储层几何形状影响方面的不确定性会限制使用形变模型解读动乱信号的有效性。在此,我们旨在确定在蒙特塞拉特苏弗里耶尔火山的火山形变模型中使用从地震层析成像勘测中直接得出的岩浆储层几何形状的可行性。我们创建了三维形变模型,利用从低地震速度异常推断出的部分熔融区域的压力源几何形状模拟位移,并与传统的椭圆形储层几何形状进行对比。我们还测试了一个 "混合 "模型,该模型结合了地震推断的储层上部几何形状和椭圆形底座。根据 2010 年至 2022 年在蒙特塞拉特观测到的地面位移,对每个模型的结果进行了评估。结果表明,不同的储层几何形状改变了全岛的水平和垂直位移场:椭圆形储层最好地再现了垂直位移的大小,而混合储层最好地模拟了水平位移矢量和最大隆起区域。总体而言,椭球体水库与观测数据的拟合度最高,但我们注意到,由于前几年的优化工作有助于限制椭球体的形状、大小和位置,因此这一结果可能存在偏差。我们的研究结果表明,在变形建模中进一步使用地球物理约束的储层几何形状是有潜力的,我们的方法可以应用于全球其他变形火山。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信