Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women

Andrea Romanos-Nanclares, Walter C Willett, Bernard Rosner, Daniel G Stover, Sagar D Sardesai, Michelle D Holmes, Wendy Y Chen, Rulla M Tamimi, Fred K Tabung, A Heather Eliassen
{"title":"Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women","authors":"Andrea Romanos-Nanclares, Walter C Willett, Bernard Rosner, Daniel G Stover, Sagar D Sardesai, Michelle D Holmes, Wendy Y Chen, Rulla M Tamimi, Fred K Tabung, A Heather Eliassen","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Dietary patterns promoting chronic inflammation, including the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP), have been associated with certain cancers. Investigating whether this dietary pattern is associated with breast cancer—where the role of inflammation is less well-defined—could provide valuable insights and potentially improve strategies for preventing this cancer. Methods We prospectively followed 76,386 women from Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1984-2018) and 92,886 women from Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII, 1991-2019). Diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) every 4 years, starting at baseline. The inflammatory potential of diet was evaluated using the validated EDIP based on plasma CRP, IL-6, and TNFα-R2. Higher scores indicate higher dietary inflammatory potential. Hazard ratios and 95%CIs of overall and subtypes of breast cancer were estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Results During 4,490,842 person-years of follow-up, we documented 11,026 breast cancer cases. Women in the highest, compared with the lowest, EDIP quintile were at higher breast cancer risk (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19; P-trend<0.001). The association was stronger for ER-negative tumors (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.29; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.53; P-trend=0.003). Also, we observed that the association of EDIP with breast cancer risk differed by molecular subtype, with the strongest association observed with basal-like tumors (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.80; 95% CI, 1.20, 2.71; P-trend=0.004). Conclusions Higher EDIP scores were associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer, which was more pronounced for ER-negative and basal-like breast tumors. These results support the hypothesis that diet-related inflammation plays a role in breast cancer etiology, particularly tumors lacking hormone receptors.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Dietary patterns promoting chronic inflammation, including the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP), have been associated with certain cancers. Investigating whether this dietary pattern is associated with breast cancer—where the role of inflammation is less well-defined—could provide valuable insights and potentially improve strategies for preventing this cancer. Methods We prospectively followed 76,386 women from Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1984-2018) and 92,886 women from Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII, 1991-2019). Diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) every 4 years, starting at baseline. The inflammatory potential of diet was evaluated using the validated EDIP based on plasma CRP, IL-6, and TNFα-R2. Higher scores indicate higher dietary inflammatory potential. Hazard ratios and 95%CIs of overall and subtypes of breast cancer were estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Results During 4,490,842 person-years of follow-up, we documented 11,026 breast cancer cases. Women in the highest, compared with the lowest, EDIP quintile were at higher breast cancer risk (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19; P-trend<0.001). The association was stronger for ER-negative tumors (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.29; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.53; P-trend=0.003). Also, we observed that the association of EDIP with breast cancer risk differed by molecular subtype, with the strongest association observed with basal-like tumors (HRQ5vs.Q1=1.80; 95% CI, 1.20, 2.71; P-trend=0.004). Conclusions Higher EDIP scores were associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer, which was more pronounced for ER-negative and basal-like breast tumors. These results support the hypothesis that diet-related inflammation plays a role in breast cancer etiology, particularly tumors lacking hormone receptors.
前炎症性饮食模式与美国妇女罹患乳腺癌总数和亚型的风险
背景促进慢性炎症的膳食模式,包括经验性膳食炎症模式(EDIP),与某些癌症有关。乳腺癌是一种炎症作用不太明确的癌症,研究这种饮食模式是否与乳腺癌有关可提供有价值的见解,并有可能改进预防这种癌症的策略。方法 我们对护士健康研究(NHS,1984-2018 年)中的 76386 名妇女和护士健康研究 II(NHSII,1991-2019 年)中的 92886 名妇女进行了前瞻性跟踪调查。从基线开始,每4年通过食物频率问卷(FFQ)对饮食进行一次评估。根据血浆 CRP、IL-6 和 TNFα-R2 使用经过验证的 EDIP 评估饮食的炎症潜力。得分越高,表明饮食的炎症潜能越高。使用多变量调整考克斯回归模型估算了乳腺癌总体和亚型的危险比和 95%CIs 。结果 在 4,490,842 人年的随访中,我们记录了 11,026 例乳腺癌病例。与最低EDIP五分位数的妇女相比,EDIP五分位数最高的妇女患乳腺癌的风险更高(HRQ5vs.Q1=1.12;95% CI,1.05,1.19;P-trend<0.001)。ER阴性肿瘤的相关性更强(HRQ5vs.Q1=1.29;95% CI,1.09,1.53;P-trend=0.003)。此外,我们还观察到 EDIP 与乳腺癌风险的关联因分子亚型而异,其中与基底样肿瘤的关联最强(HRQ5vs.Q1=1.80;95% CI,1.20,2.71;P-trend=0.004)。结论 EDIP评分越高,患乳腺癌的风险就会略有增加,这在ER阴性和基底样乳腺肿瘤中更为明显。这些结果支持饮食相关炎症在乳腺癌病因中发挥作用的假设,尤其是缺乏激素受体的肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信