Murat Aşık, Reyhan İlhan, Mehmet Güven Günver, Özden Orhan, Muhammed Taha Esmeray, Öznur Kalaba, Mehmet Kemal Arıkan
{"title":"Multimodal Neuroimaging in the Prediction of Deep TMS Response in OCD.","authors":"Murat Aşık, Reyhan İlhan, Mehmet Güven Günver, Özden Orhan, Muhammed Taha Esmeray, Öznur Kalaba, Mehmet Kemal Arıkan","doi":"10.1177/15500594241298977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Backgrounds:</b> .Brain morphological biomarkers could contribute to understanding the treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Multimodal neuroimaging addresses this issue by providing more comprehensive information regarding neural processes and structures. <b>Objectives.</b> The present study aims to investigate whether patients responsive to deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) differ from non-responsive individuals in terms of electrophysiology and brain morphology. Secondly, to test whether multimodal neuroimaging is superior to unimodal neuroimaging in predicting response to deep TMS. <b>Methods.</b> Thirty-two OCD patients who underwent thirty sessions of deep TMS treatment were included in the study. Based on a minimum 50% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores after treatment, patients were grouped as responders (n = 25) and non-responders (n = 7). The baseline resting state qEEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) records of patients were recorded. Independent sample t-test is used to compare the groups. Then, three logistic regression model were calculated for only QEEG markers, only MRI markers, and both QEEG/MRI markers. The predictive values of the three models were compared. <b>Results.</b> OCD patients who responded to deep TMS treatment had increased Alpha-2 power in the left temporal area and increased volume in the left temporal pole, entorhinal area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared to non-responders. The logistic regression model showed better prediction performance when both QEEG and MRI markers were included. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding new functional and structural neuroimaging markers and highlights the superiority of multimodal neuroimaging to unimodal neuroimaging techniques in predicting treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594241298977"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241298977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: .Brain morphological biomarkers could contribute to understanding the treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Multimodal neuroimaging addresses this issue by providing more comprehensive information regarding neural processes and structures. Objectives. The present study aims to investigate whether patients responsive to deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) differ from non-responsive individuals in terms of electrophysiology and brain morphology. Secondly, to test whether multimodal neuroimaging is superior to unimodal neuroimaging in predicting response to deep TMS. Methods. Thirty-two OCD patients who underwent thirty sessions of deep TMS treatment were included in the study. Based on a minimum 50% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores after treatment, patients were grouped as responders (n = 25) and non-responders (n = 7). The baseline resting state qEEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) records of patients were recorded. Independent sample t-test is used to compare the groups. Then, three logistic regression model were calculated for only QEEG markers, only MRI markers, and both QEEG/MRI markers. The predictive values of the three models were compared. Results. OCD patients who responded to deep TMS treatment had increased Alpha-2 power in the left temporal area and increased volume in the left temporal pole, entorhinal area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared to non-responders. The logistic regression model showed better prediction performance when both QEEG and MRI markers were included. Conclusions. This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding new functional and structural neuroimaging markers and highlights the superiority of multimodal neuroimaging to unimodal neuroimaging techniques in predicting treatment response.