Development of the quality improvement collaborative questionnaire (QuIC) to explore quality improvement partnerships to teach pre-registration nursing students.

Verity Mak, Gabrielle Brand, Julia Morphet
{"title":"Development of the quality improvement collaborative questionnaire (QuIC) to explore quality improvement partnerships to teach pre-registration nursing students.","authors":"Verity Mak, Gabrielle Brand, Julia Morphet","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2024.2424797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement partnerships between healthcare organisations and higher education require further research to explore their potential to provide a valuable education experience for pre-registration nursing students.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Develop and validate a questionnaire for nurse academics to evaluate quality improvement content in pre-registration nursing curricula and the extent of partnership with higher education providers in developing this content. Conduct a pilot test of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Use a content validity approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Australian higher education sector was the setting and participants were nurse academics with knowledge of the quality improvement content taught in pre-registration nursing courses. The quality improvement collaboration (QuIC) questionnaire was informed by the literature and sent to ten quality improvement and higher education experts for content validation. Each question was scored on a Likert scale for relevance and clarity. The QuIC questionnaire was distributed by email to the 37 higher education organisations offering pre-registration programmes in Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the questionnaire data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight experts completed the content validity questionnaire in full, with the QuIC questionnaire achieving an excellent content validity score of 0.94 for relevance and clarity. The QuIC questionnaire was completed by 24 participants. The results indicated that quality improvement education partnerships are only used occasionally in Australia. The education methods used to teach this content were case studies (online cases n = 11, 46%; patient cases n = 9, 38%) and the development of quality improvement education materials (n = 7, 29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QuIC questionnaire demonstrates excellent relevance and clarity, and is the first in the literature to address the constructs of quality improvement education and partnerships. The pilot results provide insight into quality improvement education methods used in Australia and the presence of partnerships. These results may be used to assist in the implementation of quality improvement education partnerships into curricula across the health professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93954,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary nurse","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2024.2424797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement partnerships between healthcare organisations and higher education require further research to explore their potential to provide a valuable education experience for pre-registration nursing students.

Aims: Develop and validate a questionnaire for nurse academics to evaluate quality improvement content in pre-registration nursing curricula and the extent of partnership with higher education providers in developing this content. Conduct a pilot test of the questionnaire.

Study design: Use a content validity approach.

Methods: The Australian higher education sector was the setting and participants were nurse academics with knowledge of the quality improvement content taught in pre-registration nursing courses. The quality improvement collaboration (QuIC) questionnaire was informed by the literature and sent to ten quality improvement and higher education experts for content validation. Each question was scored on a Likert scale for relevance and clarity. The QuIC questionnaire was distributed by email to the 37 higher education organisations offering pre-registration programmes in Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the questionnaire data.

Results: Eight experts completed the content validity questionnaire in full, with the QuIC questionnaire achieving an excellent content validity score of 0.94 for relevance and clarity. The QuIC questionnaire was completed by 24 participants. The results indicated that quality improvement education partnerships are only used occasionally in Australia. The education methods used to teach this content were case studies (online cases n = 11, 46%; patient cases n = 9, 38%) and the development of quality improvement education materials (n = 7, 29%).

Conclusions: The QuIC questionnaire demonstrates excellent relevance and clarity, and is the first in the literature to address the constructs of quality improvement education and partnerships. The pilot results provide insight into quality improvement education methods used in Australia and the presence of partnerships. These results may be used to assist in the implementation of quality improvement education partnerships into curricula across the health professions.

开发质量改进合作问卷 (QuIC),探索质量改进合作关系,为注册前护理专业学生授课。
背景:目的:为护士学者开发并验证一份问卷,以评估注册前护理课程中的质量改进内容,以及在开发这些内容时与高等教育机构的合作程度。对问卷进行试点测试:研究方法:采用内容效度法:方法:以澳大利亚高等教育部门为背景,参与者为了解注册前护理课程中质量改进内容的护士学者。质量改进合作(QuIC)问卷参考了相关文献,并发送给十位质量改进和高等教育专家进行内容验证。每个问题的相关性和清晰度均采用李克特量表评分。QuIC 问卷通过电子邮件发送给了澳大利亚 37 家提供注册前课程的高等教育机构。问卷数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析:八位专家完整填写了内容效度问卷,QuIC问卷在相关性和清晰度方面获得了0.94分的优异内容效度分数。24 名参与者完成了 QuIC 问卷。结果表明,质量改进教育伙伴关系在澳大利亚只是偶尔使用。用于教授该内容的教育方法是案例研究(在线案例 n = 11,占 46%;患者案例 n = 9,占 38%)和编写质量改进教育材料(n = 7,占 29%):QuIC问卷具有极高的相关性和清晰度,是文献中第一份涉及质量改进教育和合作伙伴关系的问卷。试点结果有助于深入了解澳大利亚使用的质量改进教育方法以及伙伴关系的存在情况。这些结果可用于协助在卫生专业课程中实施质量改进教育伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信