Ursodeoxycholic acid and severe COVID-19 outcomes in a cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ruth E Costello, Karen M J Waller, Rachel Smith, George F Mells, Angel Y S Wong, Anna Schultze, Viyaasan Mahalingasivam, Emily Herrett, Bang Zheng, Liang-Yu Lin, Brian MacKenna, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian C J Bacon, Ben Goldacre, Laurie A Tomlinson, John Tazare, Christopher T Rentsch
{"title":"Ursodeoxycholic acid and severe COVID-19 outcomes in a cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.","authors":"Ruth E Costello, Karen M J Waller, Rachel Smith, George F Mells, Angel Y S Wong, Anna Schultze, Viyaasan Mahalingasivam, Emily Herrett, Bang Zheng, Liang-Yu Lin, Brian MacKenna, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian C J Bacon, Ben Goldacre, Laurie A Tomlinson, John Tazare, Christopher T Rentsch","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00664-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological evidence suggests ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-a common treatment of cholestatic liver disease-may prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to compare the hazard of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death between UDCA users versus non-users in a population with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With the approval of NHS England, we conducted a population-based cohort study using primary care records between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2022, linked to death registration data and hospital records through the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between time-varying UDCA exposure and COVID-19 related hospitalisation or death, stratified by geographical region and considering models unadjusted and fully adjusted for pre-specified confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identify 11,305 eligible individuals, 640 were hospitalised or died with COVID-19 during follow-up, 400 (63%) events among UDCA users. After confounder adjustment, UDCA is associated with a 21% relative reduction in the hazard of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93), consistent with an absolute risk reduction of 1.35% (95% CI 1.07%-1.69%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found evidence that UDCA is associated with a lower hazard of COVID-19 related hospitalisation and death, support calls for clinical trials investigating UDCA as a preventative measure for severe COVID-19 outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00664-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biological evidence suggests ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-a common treatment of cholestatic liver disease-may prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to compare the hazard of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death between UDCA users versus non-users in a population with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Methods: With the approval of NHS England, we conducted a population-based cohort study using primary care records between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2022, linked to death registration data and hospital records through the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between time-varying UDCA exposure and COVID-19 related hospitalisation or death, stratified by geographical region and considering models unadjusted and fully adjusted for pre-specified confounders.

Results: We identify 11,305 eligible individuals, 640 were hospitalised or died with COVID-19 during follow-up, 400 (63%) events among UDCA users. After confounder adjustment, UDCA is associated with a 21% relative reduction in the hazard of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93), consistent with an absolute risk reduction of 1.35% (95% CI 1.07%-1.69%).

Conclusions: We found evidence that UDCA is associated with a lower hazard of COVID-19 related hospitalisation and death, support calls for clinical trials investigating UDCA as a preventative measure for severe COVID-19 outcomes.

使用 OpenSAFELY 平台进行的队列研究中的熊去氧胆酸和严重 COVID-19 结果。
背景:生物学证据表明,熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)--胆汁淤积性肝病的一种常见治疗方法--可预防严重的 COVID-19 结果。我们旨在比较原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)或原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)人群中使用 UDCA 与不使用 UDCA 者 COVID-19 住院或死亡的风险:经英格兰国家医疗服务体系(NHS)批准,我们利用 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间的初级保健记录开展了一项基于人群的队列研究,并通过 OpenSAFELY-TPP 平台将这些记录与死亡登记数据和医院记录连接起来。研究采用 Cox 比例危险度回归法估算随时间变化的 UDCA 暴露与 COVID-19 相关住院或死亡之间的危险度比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI),按地理区域进行分层,并考虑未调整和完全调整预设混杂因素的模型:我们确定了11305名符合条件的患者,其中640人在随访期间因COVID-19住院或死亡,400人(63%)为UDCA使用者。经混杂因素调整后,UDCA可使COVID-19住院或死亡风险相对降低21%(HR 0.79,95% CI 0.67-0.93),绝对风险降低1.35%(95% CI 1.07%-1.69%):我们发现有证据表明,UDCA 与 COVID-19 相关的住院和死亡风险较低,这支持了将 UDCA 作为严重 COVID-19 结果预防措施进行临床试验的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信