FairDRO: Group fairness regularization via classwise robust optimization

IF 6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Taeeon Park , Sangwon Jung , Sanghyuk Chun , Taesup Moon
{"title":"FairDRO: Group fairness regularization via classwise robust optimization","authors":"Taeeon Park ,&nbsp;Sangwon Jung ,&nbsp;Sanghyuk Chun ,&nbsp;Taesup Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing group fairness-aware training methods fall into two categories: re-weighting underrepresented groups according to certain rules, or using regularization terms such as smoothed approximations of fairness metrics or surrogate statistical quantities. While each category has its own strength in applicability or performance when compared to each other, their successful performances are typically limited to specific cases. To that end, we propose a new approach called FairDRO, which takes advantage of both categories through a <em>classwise group</em> distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework. Our method unifies re-weighting and regularization by incorporating a well-justified group fairness metric into the objective as regularization, but solving it through a principled re-weighting strategy. To optimize our resulting objective efficiently, we adopt an iterative algorithm and consequently develop two variants of FairDRO algorithm depending on the choice of surrogate loss. For in-depth understanding, we derive three theoretical results: (i) a closed-form solution for the correct re-weights; (ii) justifications for using the surrogate losses; and (iii) a convergence analysis of our method. Experimental results show that our algorithms consistently achieve state-of-the-art performance in accuracy-fairness trade-offs across multiple benchmarks, demonstrating scalability and broad applicability compared to existing methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49763,"journal":{"name":"Neural Networks","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106891"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608024008207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing group fairness-aware training methods fall into two categories: re-weighting underrepresented groups according to certain rules, or using regularization terms such as smoothed approximations of fairness metrics or surrogate statistical quantities. While each category has its own strength in applicability or performance when compared to each other, their successful performances are typically limited to specific cases. To that end, we propose a new approach called FairDRO, which takes advantage of both categories through a classwise group distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework. Our method unifies re-weighting and regularization by incorporating a well-justified group fairness metric into the objective as regularization, but solving it through a principled re-weighting strategy. To optimize our resulting objective efficiently, we adopt an iterative algorithm and consequently develop two variants of FairDRO algorithm depending on the choice of surrogate loss. For in-depth understanding, we derive three theoretical results: (i) a closed-form solution for the correct re-weights; (ii) justifications for using the surrogate losses; and (iii) a convergence analysis of our method. Experimental results show that our algorithms consistently achieve state-of-the-art performance in accuracy-fairness trade-offs across multiple benchmarks, demonstrating scalability and broad applicability compared to existing methods.
FairDRO:通过分类稳健优化实现群体公平正则化。
现有的群体公平感知训练方法分为两类:根据特定规则对代表性不足的群体重新加权,或使用正则化术语,如公平度量的平滑近似值或替代统计量。虽然两类方法相比,在适用性或性能方面各有优势,但它们的成功表现通常仅限于特定情况。为此,我们提出了一种名为 FairDRO 的新方法,该方法通过类组分布稳健优化 (DRO) 框架利用了这两个类别的优势。我们的方法将重新加权和正则化统一起来,将合理的群体公平度量纳入目标作为正则化,但通过有原则的重新加权策略来解决。为了有效优化目标,我们采用了一种迭代算法,并根据替代损失的选择,开发出了两种不同的 FairDRO 算法。为了深入理解,我们得出了三个理论结果:(i) 正确重权的闭式解;(ii) 使用代理损失的理由;(iii) 我们方法的收敛性分析。实验结果表明,与现有方法相比,我们的算法在准确性-公平性权衡方面在多个基准测试中始终保持最先进的性能,证明了其可扩展性和广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Networks
Neural Networks 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
425
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neural Networks is a platform that aims to foster an international community of scholars and practitioners interested in neural networks, deep learning, and other approaches to artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our journal invites submissions covering various aspects of neural networks research, from computational neuroscience and cognitive modeling to mathematical analyses and engineering applications. By providing a forum for interdisciplinary discussions between biology and technology, we aim to encourage the development of biologically-inspired artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信