Impact of access to coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention on in-hospital and five-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study in Thailand.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ponlagrit Kumwichar, Jutatip Thungthong, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Hisateru Tachimori, Mariko Hosozawa, Eiko Saito, Yuta Taniguchi, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, Hiroyasu Iso
{"title":"Impact of access to coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention on in-hospital and five-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study in Thailand.","authors":"Ponlagrit Kumwichar, Jutatip Thungthong, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Hisateru Tachimori, Mariko Hosozawa, Eiko Saito, Yuta Taniguchi, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, Hiroyasu Iso","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00390-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are superior to non-invasive approaches in reducing mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, their efficacy remains uncertain in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and limited in low-resource settings. This study aimed to compare in-hospital and 5-year mortality rates between patients with a first event of STEMI and NSTE-ACS who underwent CAG and PCI and those with similar severity who did not undergo CAG and PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study was conducted using population-based claims data of national universal coverage of Thailand for identification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. The mortality of recruited patients was additionally linked to the national database of vital registration. Patients aged ≥ 40 years who were hospitalized for STEMI and NSTE-ACS in 2017, with a focus on access to CAG and PCI were included. For each condition either STEMI or NSTE-ACS, patients who underwent CAG and PCI were matched to those who did not undergo using propensity score matching (PSM) to balance measured confounders, such as age, sex, and underlying conditions. In-hospital mortality rate ratio and 5-year mortality were analyzed as measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through PSM, 2,702 non-intervention STEMI patients were paired with an equal number of intervention patients, and similarly, 5,072 non-intervention NSTE-ACS patients were matched with an equivalent group who received interventions. For patients with STEMI, the in-hospital mortality rate ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) for those who underwent CAG and PCI compared to those who did not was 30.1% (30.0%, 30.2%). Similar trends were observed in patients with NSTE-ACS with a mortality rate of 34.7% (34.6%, 34.8%). For the five-year mortality comparison, the hazard ratios (95% CI) of mortality after discharge were 0.55 (0.50, 0.62) for STEMI and 0.57 (0.54, 0.61) for NSTE-ACS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to CAG and PCI was significantly associated with lower in-hospital and 5-year mortality rates in patients who experienced their first event of ACS, despite the limited availability of some unmeasured or residual confounders. Healthcare systems should expand their resources for CAG and PCI in Thailand and other countries to equitably enhance longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00390-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are superior to non-invasive approaches in reducing mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, their efficacy remains uncertain in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and limited in low-resource settings. This study aimed to compare in-hospital and 5-year mortality rates between patients with a first event of STEMI and NSTE-ACS who underwent CAG and PCI and those with similar severity who did not undergo CAG and PCI.

Methods: A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study was conducted using population-based claims data of national universal coverage of Thailand for identification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. The mortality of recruited patients was additionally linked to the national database of vital registration. Patients aged ≥ 40 years who were hospitalized for STEMI and NSTE-ACS in 2017, with a focus on access to CAG and PCI were included. For each condition either STEMI or NSTE-ACS, patients who underwent CAG and PCI were matched to those who did not undergo using propensity score matching (PSM) to balance measured confounders, such as age, sex, and underlying conditions. In-hospital mortality rate ratio and 5-year mortality were analyzed as measures.

Results: Through PSM, 2,702 non-intervention STEMI patients were paired with an equal number of intervention patients, and similarly, 5,072 non-intervention NSTE-ACS patients were matched with an equivalent group who received interventions. For patients with STEMI, the in-hospital mortality rate ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) for those who underwent CAG and PCI compared to those who did not was 30.1% (30.0%, 30.2%). Similar trends were observed in patients with NSTE-ACS with a mortality rate of 34.7% (34.6%, 34.8%). For the five-year mortality comparison, the hazard ratios (95% CI) of mortality after discharge were 0.55 (0.50, 0.62) for STEMI and 0.57 (0.54, 0.61) for NSTE-ACS cases.

Conclusions: Access to CAG and PCI was significantly associated with lower in-hospital and 5-year mortality rates in patients who experienced their first event of ACS, despite the limited availability of some unmeasured or residual confounders. Healthcare systems should expand their resources for CAG and PCI in Thailand and other countries to equitably enhance longevity.

冠状动脉造影术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内死亡率和五年死亡率的影响:泰国的倾向匹配队列研究。
背景:冠状动脉造影术(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在降低ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者死亡率方面优于无创方法。然而,它们在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)中的疗效仍不确定,而且在低资源环境中也很有限。本研究旨在比较首次发生 STEMI 和 NSTE-ACS 并接受 CAG 和 PCI 治疗的患者与未接受 CAG 和 PCI 治疗但病情严重程度相似的患者的院内死亡率和 5 年死亡率:利用泰国全民医保的人口报销数据,对急性冠脉综合征患者进行了倾向匹配回顾性队列研究。所招募患者的死亡率还与国家生命登记数据库相关联。纳入了 2017 年因 STEMI 和 NSTE-ACS 住院的年龄≥ 40 岁的患者,重点关注 CAG 和 PCI 的使用情况。对于 STEMI 或 NSTE-ACS 两种病症,采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)将接受 CAG 和 PCI 治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者进行匹配,以平衡年龄、性别和基础疾病等测量混杂因素。结果分析了院内死亡率和5年死亡率:通过密度评分匹配,2702 名未接受干预的 STEMI 患者与同等数量的接受干预的患者配对,同样,5072 名未接受干预的 NSTE-ACS 患者与同等数量的接受干预的患者配对。就 STEMI 患者而言,与未接受 CAG 和 PCI 治疗的患者相比,接受 CAG 和 PCI 治疗的患者的院内死亡率比值(95% 置信区间 (CI))为 30.1%(30.0%,30.2%)。在 NSTE-ACS 患者中也观察到类似的趋势,死亡率为 34.7% (34.6%, 34.8%)。在五年死亡率比较中,STEMI患者出院后死亡率的危险比(95% CI)为0.55(0.50,0.62),NSTE-ACS患者出院后死亡率的危险比为0.57(0.54,0.61):尽管一些未测量或残留的混杂因素有限,但在首次发生 ACS 的患者中,接受 CAG 和 PCI 与较低的院内死亡率和 5 年死亡率密切相关。泰国和其他国家的医疗系统应扩大CAG和PCI的资源,以公平地延长患者的寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信