{"title":"Functional outcome predictors and recanalization in cerebral venous thrombosis: A single-center cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rizwana Shahid, Azra Zafar","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_65_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare type of stroke. Functional outcome (FOC) in CVT can be affected by different factors, and recanalization is an important determinant. This study aimed to identify the FOC predictors including recanalization in patients with CVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed electronic charts of patients with CVT admitted to the King Fahd Hospital of the University, a teaching and referral hospital between January 2012 and March 2023. Demographic and other clinicoradiological characteristics were noted. Factors affecting FOC were investigated using the Chi-square test, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 64 patients, 78% achieved good FOC. Age was significantly higher in patients having poor FOC as compared to those having good FOC (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). Women had more likelihood to be functionally independent as compared to men (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.01-1.80, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Altered consciousness (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.23-6.99, <i>P</i> = 0.01), venous hemorrhagic infarction (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.36-7.82, <i>P</i> = 0.008), and nonrecanalization (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.97-2.14, <i>P</i> = 0.02) were significantly associated with poor FOC. Hereditary thrombophilia (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.31-1.12, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and infections (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.31-1.12, <i>P</i> = 0.01) were associated with less likelihood of good FOC. Age ≥50 years (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and illness of more than 1-month duration (<i>P</i> = 0.01) were associated with nonrecanalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older age, male sex, presence of venous hemorrhagic infarction, and nonrecanalization can predict poor FOC in CVT. The recanalization process can be affected by late presentation, and the plausible reason could be a delay in therapeutic anticoagulation. Further prospective and multicenter studies are needed to determine the predictors of FOC and to understand the process of recanalization in CVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"218-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_65_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare type of stroke. Functional outcome (FOC) in CVT can be affected by different factors, and recanalization is an important determinant. This study aimed to identify the FOC predictors including recanalization in patients with CVT.
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed electronic charts of patients with CVT admitted to the King Fahd Hospital of the University, a teaching and referral hospital between January 2012 and March 2023. Demographic and other clinicoradiological characteristics were noted. Factors affecting FOC were investigated using the Chi-square test, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: Out of 64 patients, 78% achieved good FOC. Age was significantly higher in patients having poor FOC as compared to those having good FOC (P ≤ 0.001). Women had more likelihood to be functionally independent as compared to men (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.01-1.80, P = 0.02). Altered consciousness (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.23-6.99, P = 0.01), venous hemorrhagic infarction (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.36-7.82, P = 0.008), and nonrecanalization (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.97-2.14, P = 0.02) were significantly associated with poor FOC. Hereditary thrombophilia (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.31-1.12, P = 0.03) and infections (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.31-1.12, P = 0.01) were associated with less likelihood of good FOC. Age ≥50 years (P = 0.01) and illness of more than 1-month duration (P = 0.01) were associated with nonrecanalization.
Conclusion: Older age, male sex, presence of venous hemorrhagic infarction, and nonrecanalization can predict poor FOC in CVT. The recanalization process can be affected by late presentation, and the plausible reason could be a delay in therapeutic anticoagulation. Further prospective and multicenter studies are needed to determine the predictors of FOC and to understand the process of recanalization in CVT.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.