Emergency practitioner-administered ultrasound nerve blocks in the emergency department: A retrospective analysis.

IF 1.1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Suhrith Bhattaram, Varsha S Shinde, Ishan Lamba, Princy Panthoi Khumujam, Tanvi Snehal Desai
{"title":"Emergency practitioner-administered ultrasound nerve blocks in the emergency department: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Suhrith Bhattaram, Varsha S Shinde, Ishan Lamba, Princy Panthoi Khumujam, Tanvi Snehal Desai","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_41_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the realm of acute pain management within emergency departments (EDs), the prevalent reliance on systemic analgesics, notably opioids, presents challenges due to associated risks and suboptimal efficacy. The emerging alternative of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (USGNBs) has shown promise in prospective studies. However, the safety and efficacy of USGNBs when performed by emergency medicine practitioners remain largely unexplored, necessitating this study to address the research gap. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of Emergency physician-performed USGNBs and changes in patient-reported pain (pre- and postnerve block) at 15 and 30 min. In addition, the time taken to perform nerve blocks, type of nerve block, frequency, indications, procedure time, and complications were all studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Pune, India, this single-center, retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of USGNBs in the ED context. A retrospective analysis covered 274 emergency practitioner-performed USGNBs recorded from January 2022 to December 2023. Participants included consecutive ED patients consenting to nerve blocks, with practitioners utilizing bupivacaine (0.25%) and ropivacaine (0.25%) based on individual preferences. The study systematically recorded patient demographics, block types, indications, complications, and pre- and postpain scores on a Numerical Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-USGNB, with an average decrease of 2.9 ± 1.08 at 15 min and 5.8 ± 1.39 at 30 min. Commonly performed blocks included the femoral nerve, fascia iliaca, and serratus anterior, with notable pain relief in fracture management cases. Procedural durations varied, ranging from 2 to 12 min, while four complications were reported, including diaphragmatic paresis and arterial punctures during interscalene nerve block and fascia iliac compartment blocks, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This extensive study in an academic ED setting supports the proficiency of emergency practitioners in performing USGNBs. The findings emphasize the transformative potential of USGNBs in academic ED pain management, showcasing notable pain reduction and minimal complications. These results advocate for the integration of advanced pain relief techniques into emergency medicine training programs, contributing to a comprehensive approach to acute pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_41_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the realm of acute pain management within emergency departments (EDs), the prevalent reliance on systemic analgesics, notably opioids, presents challenges due to associated risks and suboptimal efficacy. The emerging alternative of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (USGNBs) has shown promise in prospective studies. However, the safety and efficacy of USGNBs when performed by emergency medicine practitioners remain largely unexplored, necessitating this study to address the research gap. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of Emergency physician-performed USGNBs and changes in patient-reported pain (pre- and postnerve block) at 15 and 30 min. In addition, the time taken to perform nerve blocks, type of nerve block, frequency, indications, procedure time, and complications were all studied.

Methods: Conducted at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Pune, India, this single-center, retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of USGNBs in the ED context. A retrospective analysis covered 274 emergency practitioner-performed USGNBs recorded from January 2022 to December 2023. Participants included consecutive ED patients consenting to nerve blocks, with practitioners utilizing bupivacaine (0.25%) and ropivacaine (0.25%) based on individual preferences. The study systematically recorded patient demographics, block types, indications, complications, and pre- and postpain scores on a Numerical Rating Scale.

Results: The study demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-USGNB, with an average decrease of 2.9 ± 1.08 at 15 min and 5.8 ± 1.39 at 30 min. Commonly performed blocks included the femoral nerve, fascia iliaca, and serratus anterior, with notable pain relief in fracture management cases. Procedural durations varied, ranging from 2 to 12 min, while four complications were reported, including diaphragmatic paresis and arterial punctures during interscalene nerve block and fascia iliac compartment blocks, respectively.

Conclusion: This extensive study in an academic ED setting supports the proficiency of emergency practitioners in performing USGNBs. The findings emphasize the transformative potential of USGNBs in academic ED pain management, showcasing notable pain reduction and minimal complications. These results advocate for the integration of advanced pain relief techniques into emergency medicine training programs, contributing to a comprehensive approach to acute pain management.

急诊科由急诊医生进行超声神经阻滞:回顾性分析。
目的:在急诊科(ED)的急性疼痛治疗领域,由于相关风险和疗效不佳,普遍依赖全身止痛药(尤其是阿片类药物)的做法面临挑战。在前瞻性研究中,超声引导神经阻滞(USGNBs)这一新兴替代疗法已显示出良好的前景。然而,由急诊科医生实施的超声引导神经阻滞的安全性和有效性在很大程度上仍未得到探讨,因此有必要开展本研究来填补这一研究空白。本研究的主要目的是评估急诊医生实施 USGNB 的疗效,以及 15 分钟和 30 分钟后患者报告的疼痛变化(神经阻滞前后)。此外,还研究了进行神经阻滞所需的时间、神经阻滞的类型、频率、适应症、手术时间和并发症:这项单中心回顾性观察研究在印度浦那的一家三级护理教学医院进行,旨在评估急诊室中 USGNB 的有效性。回顾性分析涵盖了 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间记录的 274 例急诊医生实施的 USGNB。参与者包括同意进行神经阻滞的连续急诊患者,医生根据患者的个人偏好使用布比卡因(0.25%)和罗哌卡因(0.25%)。研究系统地记录了患者的人口统计学特征、阻滞类型、适应症、并发症以及疼痛前后的数字评分量表:研究表明,USGNB 术后疼痛评分明显降低,15 分钟内平均降低 2.9 ± 1.08 分,30 分钟内平均降低 5.8 ± 1.39 分。常见的阻滞包括股神经、髂筋膜和前锯肌,在骨折处理病例中疼痛明显缓解。手术时间长短不一,从2分钟到12分钟不等,有四例并发症报告,包括膈肌麻痹和动脉穿刺,分别发生在椎间神经阻滞和髂筋膜室阻滞过程中:这项在学术性急诊室环境中进行的广泛研究证实了急诊从业人员在进行 USGNB 时的熟练程度。研究结果强调了 USGNB 在学术性急诊室疼痛管理中的变革潜力,显示出明显的疼痛减轻和极少的并发症。这些结果倡导将先进的止痛技术纳入急诊医学培训计划,从而为急性疼痛管理的综合方法做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信