An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Inge A H van den Berk, Colin Jacobs, Maadrika M N P Kanglie, Onno M Mets, Miranda Snoeren, Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt, Elisabeth M Taal, Tjitske S R van Engelen, Jan M Prins, Shandra Bipat, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker
{"title":"An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study.","authors":"Inge A H van den Berk, Colin Jacobs, Maadrika M N P Kanglie, Onno M Mets, Miranda Snoeren, Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt, Elisabeth M Taal, Tjitske S R van Engelen, Jan M Prins, Shandra Bipat, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00518-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To retrospectively assess the added value of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) performed at the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the OPTIMACT trial, 870 patients with suspected nontraumatic pulmonary disease underwent ULDCT. The ED radiologist prospectively read the examinations and reported incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up. All ULDCTs were processed post hoc using an AI deep learning software marking pulmonary nodules ≥ 6 mm. Three chest radiologists independently reviewed the subset of ULDCTs with either prospectively detected incidental nodules in 35/870 patients or AI marks in 458/870 patients; findings scored as nodules by at least two chest radiologists were used as true positive reference standard. Proportions of true and false positives were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the OPTIMACT study, 59 incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up were prospectively reported. In the current analysis, 18/59 (30.5%) nodules were scored as true positive while 104/1,862 (5.6%) AI marks in 84/870 patients (9.7%) were scored as true positive. Overall, 5.8 times more (104 versus 18) true positive pulmonary nodules were detected with the use of AI, at the expense of 42.9 times more (1,758 versus 41) false positives. There was a median number of 1 (IQR: 0-2) AI mark per ULDCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of AI on ULDCT in patients suspected of pulmonary disease in an emergency setting results in the detection of many more incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up (5.8×) with a high trade-off in terms of false positives (42.9×).</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>AI aids in the detection of incidental pulmonary nodules that require follow-up at chest-CT, aiding early pulmonary cancer detection but also results in an increase of false positive results that are mainly clustered in patients with major abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The OPTIMACT trial was registered on 6 December 2016 in the National Trial Register (number NTR6163) (onderzoekmetmensen.nl).</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>An AI deep learning algorithm was tested on 870 ULDCT examinations acquired in the ED. AI detected 5.8 times more pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up (true positives). AI resulted in the detection of 42.9 times more false positive results, clustered in patients with major abnormalities. AI in the ED setting may aid in early pulmonary cancer detection with a high trade-off in terms of false positives.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00518-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To retrospectively assess the added value of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) performed at the emergency department (ED).

Methods: In the OPTIMACT trial, 870 patients with suspected nontraumatic pulmonary disease underwent ULDCT. The ED radiologist prospectively read the examinations and reported incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up. All ULDCTs were processed post hoc using an AI deep learning software marking pulmonary nodules ≥ 6 mm. Three chest radiologists independently reviewed the subset of ULDCTs with either prospectively detected incidental nodules in 35/870 patients or AI marks in 458/870 patients; findings scored as nodules by at least two chest radiologists were used as true positive reference standard. Proportions of true and false positives were compared.

Results: During the OPTIMACT study, 59 incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up were prospectively reported. In the current analysis, 18/59 (30.5%) nodules were scored as true positive while 104/1,862 (5.6%) AI marks in 84/870 patients (9.7%) were scored as true positive. Overall, 5.8 times more (104 versus 18) true positive pulmonary nodules were detected with the use of AI, at the expense of 42.9 times more (1,758 versus 41) false positives. There was a median number of 1 (IQR: 0-2) AI mark per ULDCT.

Conclusion: The use of AI on ULDCT in patients suspected of pulmonary disease in an emergency setting results in the detection of many more incidental pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up (5.8×) with a high trade-off in terms of false positives (42.9×).

Relevance statement: AI aids in the detection of incidental pulmonary nodules that require follow-up at chest-CT, aiding early pulmonary cancer detection but also results in an increase of false positive results that are mainly clustered in patients with major abnormalities.

Trial registration: The OPTIMACT trial was registered on 6 December 2016 in the National Trial Register (number NTR6163) (onderzoekmetmensen.nl).

Key points: An AI deep learning algorithm was tested on 870 ULDCT examinations acquired in the ED. AI detected 5.8 times more pulmonary nodules requiring follow-up (true positives). AI resulted in the detection of 42.9 times more false positive results, clustered in patients with major abnormalities. AI in the ED setting may aid in early pulmonary cancer detection with a high trade-off in terms of false positives.

急诊超低剂量 CT 上检测肺结节的人工智能深度学习算法:读者研究。
背景:回顾性评估人工智能(AI)算法在急诊科(ED)超低剂量计算机断层扫描(ULDCT)上检测肺结节的附加值:在 OPTIMACT 试验中,870 名疑似非创伤性肺部疾病患者接受了超低剂量计算机断层扫描。急诊科放射科医生对检查结果进行前瞻性阅读,并报告需要随访的偶发肺结节。使用人工智能深度学习软件对所有 ULDCT 进行事后处理,标记出≥ 6 毫米的肺结节。35/870 例患者的 ULDCT 中有前瞻性检测到的偶发结节,458/870 例患者的 ULDCT 中有人工智能标记,由三位胸部放射科医生独立审查;至少两位胸部放射科医生评分为结节的结果作为真阳性参考标准。比较了真阳性和假阳性的比例:结果:在 OPTIMACT 研究期间,前瞻性地报告了 59 例需要随访的偶然肺结节。在目前的分析中,18/59(30.5%)个结节被评为真阳性,而 84/870 病人(9.7%)中的 104/1,862 (5.6%)个 AI 标记被评为真阳性。总体而言,使用人工智能检测到的真阳性肺结节是假阳性的 5.8 倍(104 对 18),而假阳性则是真阳性的 42.9 倍(1,758 对 41)。每例 ULDCT 的 AI 中位数为 1(IQR:0-2)个:结论:在急诊环境中对疑似肺部疾病患者的 ULDCT 使用 AI 会导致发现更多需要随访的偶然肺结节(5.8 倍),而在假阳性方面则需要付出高昂的代价(42.9 倍):人工智能有助于发现需要进行胸部 CT 随访的偶发肺结节,有助于早期肺癌的发现,但也会导致假阳性结果的增加,而这些假阳性结果主要集中在有重大异常的患者身上:OPTIMACT试验于2016年12月6日在国家试验注册中心(onderzoekmetmensen.nl)注册(编号NTR6163):在急诊室获得的870例ULDCT检查中测试了人工智能深度学习算法。人工智能检测出的需要随访的肺结节(真阳性)比人工智能多 5.8 倍。人工智能检测出的假阳性结果是真阳性的42.9倍,主要集中在有重大异常的患者身上。在急诊室进行人工智能检查可能有助于早期肺癌的检测,但在假阳性结果方面需要做出较高的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信