[Comparative study of thulium and holmium laser in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer].

Q4 Medicine
Urologiia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
V Popov S, G Guseinov R, V Pomeshkin E, N Skryabin O, V Sivak K, V Perepelitsa V, A Lelyavina T, A Malyshev E
{"title":"[Comparative study of thulium and holmium laser in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer].","authors":"V Popov S, G Guseinov R, V Pomeshkin E, N Skryabin O, V Sivak K, V Perepelitsa V, A Lelyavina T, A Malyshev E","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare thulium and holmium lasers in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our work, patients were divided into 3 groups, depending on the treatment method. In the group 1 (n=27, 32.14% of the cohort), thulium laser resection of the bladder was done, while in the group 2 (n=25, 29.76% of the cohort) and group 3 (n=32, 38.10 % of the cohort) holmium laser resection and standard transurethral resection (TUR) were performed, respectively. In the preoperative period, all patients underwent a standard clinical examinations and imaging studies (computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneal space, magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis, cystoscopy, cytological examination of urine sediment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of the procedure was 14.7+/-5.2 minutes for a thulium laser and 16.3+/-5.3 minutes for a holmium laser, compared to 20.5+/-7.4 minutes for standard TUR. The duration of postoperative irrigation after laser resection was lower (4.4+/-1.8, 4.7+/-1.6 and 16.4+/-2.5 hours, respectively) (p<0.001). The period of postoperative catheterization in groups 1 and 2 was 1.5+/-0.08 and 1.6+/-0.08 days, respectively, compared to 2.5+/- 0.13 days in the group 3 (p=0.002). In the group of thulium and holmium laser resection, a higher disease-free survival was demonstrated compared with TUR throughout the entire follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When performing laser resection of the bladder wall for NMIBC, a significant lower number of complications and better survival were documented compared to patients who underwent TUR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23546,"journal":{"name":"Urologiia","volume":" 4","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare thulium and holmium lasers in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Materials and methods: In our work, patients were divided into 3 groups, depending on the treatment method. In the group 1 (n=27, 32.14% of the cohort), thulium laser resection of the bladder was done, while in the group 2 (n=25, 29.76% of the cohort) and group 3 (n=32, 38.10 % of the cohort) holmium laser resection and standard transurethral resection (TUR) were performed, respectively. In the preoperative period, all patients underwent a standard clinical examinations and imaging studies (computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneal space, magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis, cystoscopy, cytological examination of urine sediment).

Results: The duration of the procedure was 14.7+/-5.2 minutes for a thulium laser and 16.3+/-5.3 minutes for a holmium laser, compared to 20.5+/-7.4 minutes for standard TUR. The duration of postoperative irrigation after laser resection was lower (4.4+/-1.8, 4.7+/-1.6 and 16.4+/-2.5 hours, respectively) (p<0.001). The period of postoperative catheterization in groups 1 and 2 was 1.5+/-0.08 and 1.6+/-0.08 days, respectively, compared to 2.5+/- 0.13 days in the group 3 (p=0.002). In the group of thulium and holmium laser resection, a higher disease-free survival was demonstrated compared with TUR throughout the entire follow-up period.

Conclusion: When performing laser resection of the bladder wall for NMIBC, a significant lower number of complications and better survival were documented compared to patients who underwent TUR.

[铥和钬激光治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较研究]。
目的:比较铥激光和钬激光在治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)中的应用:根据治疗方法的不同,我们将患者分为三组。第一组(27 人,占总人数的 32.14%)采用铥激光切除膀胱,第二组(25 人,占总人数的 29.76%)和第三组(32 人,占总人数的 38.10%)分别采用钬激光切除和标准经尿道切除术(TUR)。术前,所有患者均接受了标准的临床检查和影像学检查(胸部、腹部和腹膜后间隙计算机断层扫描、盆腔磁共振成像、膀胱镜检查、尿沉渣细胞学检查):铥激光手术时间为14.7+/-5.2分钟,钬激光手术时间为16.3+/-5.3分钟,而标准TUR手术时间为20.5+/-7.4分钟。激光切除后的术后冲洗时间较短(分别为4.4+/-1.8小时、4.7+/-1.6小时和16.4+/-2.5小时)(P结论:在对 NMIBC 患者进行膀胱壁激光切除术时,与接受 TUR 的患者相比,并发症的发生率明显降低,存活率也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologiia
Urologiia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信