EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrew M Garratt, Knut Stavem, James W Shaw, Kim Rand
{"title":"EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data.","authors":"Andrew M Garratt, Knut Stavem, James W Shaw, Kim Rand","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Norwegian adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Random and quota sampling were used to recruit the sample of adults (age> 18 years) representative of the Norwegian general population. Data collection followed EQ-VT 2.1 undertaken before and after the COVID-19 pandemic from November 2019 to December 2022, using PC-assisted and video conferencing interviews, respectively. Each respondent valued 10 health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and 7 health states using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Different statistical models were assessed for logical consistency and predictive accuracy using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,321 respondents, 1,237 met inclusion criteria. All statistical models demonstrated logical consistency. The weighted hybrid model combining both cTTOand DCE data was preferred and had the highest predictive accuracy. Predicted values ranged from -0.453 to 1, and the dimension of anxiety/depression was the most highly valued by respondents, followed by pain/discomfort, self-care, mobility, and usual activities. These findings are not dissimilar to those for most Western European countries, and regression coefficients are closest to those for other Scandinavian countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on health state values obtained from members of the adult general population in Norway. This is an important contribution to economic evaluation and the broader application ofthe EQ-5D-5L in Norway including clinical and health services research, and quality measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Norwegian adult population.

Methods: Random and quota sampling were used to recruit the sample of adults (age> 18 years) representative of the Norwegian general population. Data collection followed EQ-VT 2.1 undertaken before and after the COVID-19 pandemic from November 2019 to December 2022, using PC-assisted and video conferencing interviews, respectively. Each respondent valued 10 health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and 7 health states using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Different statistical models were assessed for logical consistency and predictive accuracy using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models.

Results: Of the 1,321 respondents, 1,237 met inclusion criteria. All statistical models demonstrated logical consistency. The weighted hybrid model combining both cTTOand DCE data was preferred and had the highest predictive accuracy. Predicted values ranged from -0.453 to 1, and the dimension of anxiety/depression was the most highly valued by respondents, followed by pain/discomfort, self-care, mobility, and usual activities. These findings are not dissimilar to those for most Western European countries, and regression coefficients are closest to those for other Scandinavian countries.

Conclusion: This study provides the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on health state values obtained from members of the adult general population in Norway. This is an important contribution to economic evaluation and the broader application ofthe EQ-5D-5L in Norway including clinical and health services research, and quality measurement.

挪威的 EQ-5D-5L 值集:使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的混合模型。
目的:根据对挪威成年人口中具有代表性的样本进行的访谈,制定挪威的EQ-5D-5L数值集:方法:采用随机抽样和配额抽样的方法,招募代表挪威一般人口的成年人(年龄大于18岁)样本。2019年11月至2022年12月,在COVID-19大流行之前和之后,分别使用PC辅助访谈和视频会议访谈,按照EQ-VT 2.1进行数据收集。每位受访者采用综合时间权衡法(cTTO)对 10 种健康状况进行估值,采用离散选择实验法(DCE)对 7 种健康状况进行估值。使用 cTTO 和 DCE 数据单独或组合作为混合模型,对不同统计模型的逻辑一致性和预测准确性进行了评估:在 1,321 名受访者中,1,237 人符合纳入标准。所有统计模型均显示出逻辑一致性。结合 cTTO 和 DCE 数据的加权混合模型更受青睐,预测准确率最高。预测值从-0.453到1不等,受访者最看重的是焦虑/抑郁维度,其次是疼痛/不适、自我护理、活动能力和日常活动。这些结果与大多数西欧国家的结果并无不同,而回归系数与其他斯堪的纳维亚国家的结果最为接近:本研究根据从挪威成年人口中获得的健康状况值,提供了挪威的EQ-5D-5L值集。这对挪威的经济评估和EQ-5D-5L的更广泛应用(包括临床和医疗服务研究以及质量测量)是一个重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信