Improving senior medical workforce retention at a large teaching hospital trust.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sarah Longwell, Hamish McLure, Sunjay Jain
{"title":"Improving senior medical workforce retention at a large teaching hospital trust.","authors":"Sarah Longwell, Hamish McLure, Sunjay Jain","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand senior clinicians' current thinking regarding retirement at a large teaching hospital trust, the reasons behind it, and what the trust can do to improve retention of these valuable staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymized survey followed by qualitative study from a focus group. Data from these were analysed using a thematic analysis. Participants were senior clinicians currently employed or who had taken retirement from the trust in the preceding 12 months. In total 140 respondents completed the survey, giving a response rate of 65%; 8 senior clinicians attended the focus group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The commonest reasons for taking retirement were wanting to pursue leisure interests, reaching a pensionable age, and feeling unable to sustain their workloads. A significant proportion, 29%, also cited that they did not feel valued. The commonest factors that would encourage respondents to remain at work included increased flexibility, reduced hours, and ability to come off on-call rotas. The main themes from the focus group were focusing on well-being, personalized conversations, and better/more accessible information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our project identified a number of reasons why clinicians are considering taking retirement, with a major theme of feeling valued underpinning decisions. This could influence strategies to help retain these experienced members of staff. We made a series of recommendations. If enacted, these would have a wider-reaching impact on more junior medical staff, aiding them to consider their own late-stage careers. They are also applicable and could easily be adapted when considering retention of other valued professionals within the trust. Key messages What is already known on this topic-We know that there is currently a medical workforce crisis at a time of greatest patient need, with an ageing workforce and senior staff who are choosing to retire early. Previous studies have reviewed the reasons behind these decisions but not specifically looked at changes that can be implemented at a local level to improve retention. What this study adds-We combined both quantitative and qualitative data from senior clinicians at a large teaching hospital trust in the North of England to understand current thinking regarding retirement and what the trust could do to improve their retention. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy-From our study we were able to make a series of recommendations that can be implemented at a local level to inform medical retention policies. These will also have wider impacts on junior medical staff and could be expanded to other healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To understand senior clinicians' current thinking regarding retirement at a large teaching hospital trust, the reasons behind it, and what the trust can do to improve retention of these valuable staff.

Methods: An anonymized survey followed by qualitative study from a focus group. Data from these were analysed using a thematic analysis. Participants were senior clinicians currently employed or who had taken retirement from the trust in the preceding 12 months. In total 140 respondents completed the survey, giving a response rate of 65%; 8 senior clinicians attended the focus group.

Results: The commonest reasons for taking retirement were wanting to pursue leisure interests, reaching a pensionable age, and feeling unable to sustain their workloads. A significant proportion, 29%, also cited that they did not feel valued. The commonest factors that would encourage respondents to remain at work included increased flexibility, reduced hours, and ability to come off on-call rotas. The main themes from the focus group were focusing on well-being, personalized conversations, and better/more accessible information.

Conclusion: Our project identified a number of reasons why clinicians are considering taking retirement, with a major theme of feeling valued underpinning decisions. This could influence strategies to help retain these experienced members of staff. We made a series of recommendations. If enacted, these would have a wider-reaching impact on more junior medical staff, aiding them to consider their own late-stage careers. They are also applicable and could easily be adapted when considering retention of other valued professionals within the trust. Key messages What is already known on this topic-We know that there is currently a medical workforce crisis at a time of greatest patient need, with an ageing workforce and senior staff who are choosing to retire early. Previous studies have reviewed the reasons behind these decisions but not specifically looked at changes that can be implemented at a local level to improve retention. What this study adds-We combined both quantitative and qualitative data from senior clinicians at a large teaching hospital trust in the North of England to understand current thinking regarding retirement and what the trust could do to improve their retention. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy-From our study we were able to make a series of recommendations that can be implemented at a local level to inform medical retention policies. These will also have wider impacts on junior medical staff and could be expanded to other healthcare professionals.

改善一家大型教学医院托管机构的高级医务人员留用情况。
目的:了解一家大型教学医院托管机构的资深临床医生目前对退休的看法、背后的原因以及托管机构可以采取哪些措施来留住这些宝贵的员工:方法:先进行匿名调查,再通过焦点小组进行定性研究。采用主题分析法对调查数据进行分析。调查对象为目前在职或在过去 12 个月内从托管机构退休的资深临床医生。共有 140 名受访者完成了调查,回复率为 65%;8 名高级临床医生参加了焦点小组:最常见的退休原因是想追求业余爱好、达到领取养老金的年龄以及感觉无法承受工作量。还有很大一部分人(29%)认为自己不被重视。鼓励受访者继续工作的最常见的因素包括增加灵活性、减少工作时间以及能够摆脱轮值。焦点小组的主要议题是关注福利、个性化对话以及更好/更容易获取的信息:我们的项目发现了临床医生考虑退休的一系列原因,其中一个主要的主题是感觉到自己的价值是做出退休决定的基础。这可能会影响到帮助留住这些经验丰富的工作人员的策略。我们提出了一系列建议。如果这些建议得以实施,将对更多初级医务人员产生更广泛的影响,帮助他们考虑自己的晚期职业生涯。这些建议也适用于信托机构在考虑留住其他有价值的专业人员时。关键信息 关于本主题的已知信息--我们知道,目前在患者需求最大的时期,医务人员队伍出现了危机,人员老化,资深员工选择提前退休。以往的研究回顾了这些决定背后的原因,但没有具体探讨可在地方层面实施的变革,以改善留住人才的情况。本研究的贡献--我们结合了英格兰北部一家大型教学医院托管机构的高级临床医生提供的定量和定性数据,以了解他们目前对退休的看法,以及该托管机构可以采取哪些措施来提高他们的留任率。本研究可能对研究、实践或政策产生的影响--通过本研究,我们提出了一系列建议,这些建议可以在地方层面实施,为留住人才的政策提供参考。这些建议还将对初级医务人员产生更广泛的影响,并可推广到其他医疗保健专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信