Patient Perspectives on Upper-Limb Daily Function in Parkinson's Disease.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noa Cohen, Rachel Kizony
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Upper-Limb Daily Function in Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Noa Cohen, Rachel Kizony","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dexterity impairments are common among people with Parkinson's disease (PWP), yet little is understood about the effect of upper-limb (UL) dysfunction on daily activity performance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to (1) map the dexterity activities most affected and meaningful to PWP; (2) explore the associations between perceived dexterity function and disease severity, cognitive and motor UL impairments, dexterity ability, self-reported activities of daily living (ADL) function, and quality of life (QOL); (3) investigate variables explaining perceived dexterity function; and (4) examine the differences in perceived dexterity function based on dominance affectedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 PWP (mean age = 70.00 years, standard deviation [SD] = 6.75) were assessed for perceived dexterity function (36-item Dexterity Questionnaire [DextQ-36]), dexterity ability (Coin Rotation Task), disease severity (modified Hoen and Yahr Scale), self-reported ADL function and motor UL impairments (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and QOL (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leading dexterity activities participants reported as difficult and meaningful included using a touchscreen, pulling on socks, and dialing a phone. Perceived dexterity significantly correlated with self-reported ADL function (r = 0.716), QOL (r = 0.691), disease severity (r = 0.470), and dominant-hand dexterity (r = 0.432). Dexterity ability and disease severity explained 30% of perceived dexterity variance. No differences in perceived dexterity function based on dominance affectedness were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PWP encounter challenges in complex dexterity tasks that impact their independence. Before interventions focused on UL function are initiated, assessments of PWP should include inquiries about the meaningfulness of challenging dexterity activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dexterity impairments are common among people with Parkinson's disease (PWP), yet little is understood about the effect of upper-limb (UL) dysfunction on daily activity performance.

Objectives: The aims were to (1) map the dexterity activities most affected and meaningful to PWP; (2) explore the associations between perceived dexterity function and disease severity, cognitive and motor UL impairments, dexterity ability, self-reported activities of daily living (ADL) function, and quality of life (QOL); (3) investigate variables explaining perceived dexterity function; and (4) examine the differences in perceived dexterity function based on dominance affectedness.

Methods: A total of 43 PWP (mean age = 70.00 years, standard deviation [SD] = 6.75) were assessed for perceived dexterity function (36-item Dexterity Questionnaire [DextQ-36]), dexterity ability (Coin Rotation Task), disease severity (modified Hoen and Yahr Scale), self-reported ADL function and motor UL impairments (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and QOL (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39).

Results: The leading dexterity activities participants reported as difficult and meaningful included using a touchscreen, pulling on socks, and dialing a phone. Perceived dexterity significantly correlated with self-reported ADL function (r = 0.716), QOL (r = 0.691), disease severity (r = 0.470), and dominant-hand dexterity (r = 0.432). Dexterity ability and disease severity explained 30% of perceived dexterity variance. No differences in perceived dexterity function based on dominance affectedness were found.

Conclusions: PWP encounter challenges in complex dexterity tasks that impact their independence. Before interventions focused on UL function are initiated, assessments of PWP should include inquiries about the meaningfulness of challenging dexterity activities.

帕金森病患者对上肢日常功能的看法。
背景:帕金森病患者普遍存在灵活性障碍:帕金森病(PWP)患者普遍存在灵活性障碍,但人们对上肢(UL)功能障碍对日常活动表现的影响知之甚少:目的是:(1)绘制对帕金森病患者影响最大、最有意义的灵巧活动图;(2)探讨感知灵巧功能与疾病严重程度、认知和运动UL障碍、灵巧能力、自我报告的日常生活(ADL)功能和生活质量(QOL)之间的关联;(3)研究解释感知灵巧功能的变量;以及(4)根据优势受影响程度研究感知灵巧功能的差异:共有 43 名残疾人(平均年龄 = 70.00 岁,标准差 [SD] = 6.75岁)的感知灵巧功能(36项灵巧性问卷[DextQ-36])、灵巧能力(硬币旋转任务)、疾病严重程度(改良的Hoen和Yahr量表)、自我报告的ADL功能和运动UL损伤(运动障碍协会-统一帕金森病评分量表)、认知(蒙特利尔认知评估)和QOL(帕金森病问卷-39)进行了评估:参与者认为有难度和有意义的主要灵巧活动包括使用触摸屏、穿袜子和拨电话。感知灵巧性与自我报告的ADL功能(r = 0.716)、QOL(r = 0.691)、疾病严重程度(r = 0.470)和优势手灵巧性(r = 0.432)显著相关。灵巧能力和疾病严重程度解释了30%的感知灵巧性差异。结论:残疾人在复杂灵巧动作方面面临挑战:结论:残疾人在完成复杂的灵活性任务时会遇到困难,这影响了他们的独立性。在启动以 UL 功能为重点的干预措施之前,对残疾人的评估应包括询问具有挑战性的灵巧活动是否有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信