Brin E. Freund , Mariam Tsikvadze , Anteneh M. Feyissa , William D. Freeman , William O. Tatum IV
{"title":"Sensitivity of detecting interictal epileptiform activity using rapid reduced montage EEG","authors":"Brin E. Freund , Mariam Tsikvadze , Anteneh M. Feyissa , William D. Freeman , William O. Tatum IV","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rapid EEG devices (REDs) have demonstrated substantial benefit regarding reduced time to performance of study and diagnosis in cases where urgent EEG is needed to evaluate patients for potentially revealing nonconvulsive status epilepticus and seizures. However, urgent EEG is also important in identifying cases regarding the need for initiation of antiseizure medication as well as triaging the use of continuous EEG monitoring. Some forms of REDs have a reduced montage (RRME) with electrode derivations that are one-half of standard recordings. This could impact spatial resolution and therefore potentially limit recovery of epileptiform abnormalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study we evaluated the use of the Ceribell® rapid response EEG system and compared it to conventional video EEG (CvEEG). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 20 subjects were included in our analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RRME was highly sensitive in detecting abundant and periodic discharges (<em>p</em> = 0.013) as well as discharges with a broad spatial distribution on CvEEG (<em>p</em> = 0.039). Sensitivity for detecting less prevalent discharges or those with more restricted spatial distribution was lower.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Given the possibility of less frequent and more restricted epileptiform discharges eluding detection on RRME, we propose a protocol for the approach of using RRME and when to consider CvEEG when RRME is negative for epileptiform activity and highlight that urgent CvEEG may still be warranted following RRME.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"467 ","pages":"Article 123277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24004131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Rapid EEG devices (REDs) have demonstrated substantial benefit regarding reduced time to performance of study and diagnosis in cases where urgent EEG is needed to evaluate patients for potentially revealing nonconvulsive status epilepticus and seizures. However, urgent EEG is also important in identifying cases regarding the need for initiation of antiseizure medication as well as triaging the use of continuous EEG monitoring. Some forms of REDs have a reduced montage (RRME) with electrode derivations that are one-half of standard recordings. This could impact spatial resolution and therefore potentially limit recovery of epileptiform abnormalities.
Methods
In this study we evaluated the use of the Ceribell® rapid response EEG system and compared it to conventional video EEG (CvEEG). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 20 subjects were included in our analysis.
Results
RRME was highly sensitive in detecting abundant and periodic discharges (p = 0.013) as well as discharges with a broad spatial distribution on CvEEG (p = 0.039). Sensitivity for detecting less prevalent discharges or those with more restricted spatial distribution was lower.
Significance
Given the possibility of less frequent and more restricted epileptiform discharges eluding detection on RRME, we propose a protocol for the approach of using RRME and when to consider CvEEG when RRME is negative for epileptiform activity and highlight that urgent CvEEG may still be warranted following RRME.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials).
JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.