Analgesia in paediatric acute pancreatitis: A scoping systematic review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
James Lucocq, Nejo Joseph, Cecilie Sigaard Knoph, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Isabelle Scheers, Asbjorn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana
{"title":"Analgesia in paediatric acute pancreatitis: A scoping systematic review.","authors":"James Lucocq, Nejo Joseph, Cecilie Sigaard Knoph, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Isabelle Scheers, Asbjorn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common paediatric condition, yet there is little data to support optimal analgesic practice. The aim of this scoping review was to report analgesic practice, investigate trends in analgesic strategy and evaluate the impact of analgesic modality on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Pubmed Central and Google Scholar was performed by two independent investigators. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three retrospective cohort studies, all conducted in North America, reported on analgesic practice in paediatric AP. The studies included 658 patients (median age, 12 years; female sex, 57%; non-biliary aetiology, 85.9%). Overall, analgesia was administered in 67% of patients, including opioids in 59.5% (43.8%-71.4%). Rates of acetaminophen (17.9% and 77.7%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7.7% and 40.2%) were reported in two studies. Two studies reported reducing rates of opioid administration or reduced duration of opioid administration since 2017 and 2014, respectively. One study did not find any correlation between opioid administration and sociodemographic factors, length of stay or admission to intensive care units. No studies reported on complications or quality of life. No studies investigated non-medical modalities. There were no long-term data on analgesic use post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment in paediatric AP in North America. However, factors that influence the analgesic type, the impact of analgesic modality on the post-pancreatitis outcome and long-term analgesic use constitute a knowledge gap. Future studies are needed to inform analgesic use in paediatric AP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common paediatric condition, yet there is little data to support optimal analgesic practice. The aim of this scoping review was to report analgesic practice, investigate trends in analgesic strategy and evaluate the impact of analgesic modality on outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Pubmed Central and Google Scholar was performed by two independent investigators. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Results: Three retrospective cohort studies, all conducted in North America, reported on analgesic practice in paediatric AP. The studies included 658 patients (median age, 12 years; female sex, 57%; non-biliary aetiology, 85.9%). Overall, analgesia was administered in 67% of patients, including opioids in 59.5% (43.8%-71.4%). Rates of acetaminophen (17.9% and 77.7%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7.7% and 40.2%) were reported in two studies. Two studies reported reducing rates of opioid administration or reduced duration of opioid administration since 2017 and 2014, respectively. One study did not find any correlation between opioid administration and sociodemographic factors, length of stay or admission to intensive care units. No studies reported on complications or quality of life. No studies investigated non-medical modalities. There were no long-term data on analgesic use post-discharge.

Conclusions: Opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment in paediatric AP in North America. However, factors that influence the analgesic type, the impact of analgesic modality on the post-pancreatitis outcome and long-term analgesic use constitute a knowledge gap. Future studies are needed to inform analgesic use in paediatric AP.

小儿急性胰腺炎的镇痛:范围界定系统综述。
目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见的儿科疾病,但支持最佳镇痛方法的数据却很少。本范围综述旨在报告镇痛实践、调查镇痛策略的趋势并评估镇痛方式对疗效的影响:方法:由两名独立研究人员对 Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、Pubmed Central 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索。本综述遵循了《系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述核对表》:三项回顾性队列研究均在北美进行,报告了儿科 AP 的镇痛实践。这些研究共纳入 658 名患者(中位年龄 12 岁;女性占 57%;非胆道病因占 85.9%)。总体而言,67%的患者接受了镇痛治疗,其中阿片类药物占 59.5%(43.8%-71.4%)。两项研究报告了对乙酰氨基酚(17.9% 和 77.7%)和非甾体抗炎药(7.7% 和 40.2%)的使用率。两项研究分别报告了自2017年和2014年以来阿片类药物用药率的降低或用药时间的缩短。一项研究未发现阿片类药物的使用与社会人口因素、住院时间或入住重症监护病房之间存在任何相关性。没有研究报告了并发症或生活质量。没有研究调查了非医疗方式。没有关于出院后使用镇痛剂的长期数据:结论:阿片类药物是北美儿科住院患者疼痛治疗的主要药物。然而,影响镇痛类型的因素、镇痛方式对胰腺炎术后结果的影响以及镇痛剂的长期使用仍是一个知识空白。未来的研究需要为儿科 AP 的镇痛使用提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信