Opioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Juan Felipe Abaunza-Camacho, Sara Gomez-Niebles, Humberto Madrinan-Navia, Rafael Aponte-Caballero, William Mauricio Riveros, Leonardo Laverde-Frade
{"title":"Opioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery.","authors":"Juan Felipe Abaunza-Camacho, Sara Gomez-Niebles, Humberto Madrinan-Navia, Rafael Aponte-Caballero, William Mauricio Riveros, Leonardo Laverde-Frade","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1792141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF).

Methods:  We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable.

Results:  We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases.

Conclusion:  Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.

经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后阿片类药物的使用:开放手术与微创手术的比较。
背景介绍阿片类药物是中度和重度慢性疼痛患者常用的药物。阿片类药物的药理特征允许其用于急性剧烈术后疼痛。然而,由于阿片类药物极易成瘾,滥用阿片类药物被认为是一个公共卫生问题。椎体融合术、减压术和器械植入术通常与急性、剧烈的术后疼痛有关。本研究旨在比较一组接受开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(OTLIF)的患者与一组接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MTLIF)的类似患者的术后阿片类药物消耗量:我们进行了一项定量、观察、分析和历史队列研究。经过方便抽样,我们确定了 45 名患者,其中 34 人接受了 OTLIF,11 人接受了 MTLIF。在测量了以下变量后进行了分析:人口统计学、手术类型、住院时间、疼痛控制、阿片类药物类型和阿片类药物剂量。统计方法根据变量的来源和行为进行:结果:我们发现,在 MTILF 组中,阿片类药物用量较少的组别在明显疼痛和不明显疼痛之间存在差异。这种差异体现在所有观察期的频率和剂量上。然而,在术后观察中,各组的频率和剂量相同。根据线性回归,手术类型、神经根病和神经根炎可解释多达 50% 的病例会出现明显的术后疼痛:我们的研究显示,接受不同手术技术的患者在阿片类药物的用量上存在明显差异。尽管这些发现对研究人群有效,但样本量的局限性凸显了进一步研究的必要性。我们的研究结果对脊柱手术的术后疼痛管理和阿片类药物的使用具有重要意义,值得继续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信