Prognostic factors in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and resection: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ammar A Javed, Alyssar Habib, Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Mahip Grewal, Nabiha Mughal, Jin He, Christopher L Wolfgang, Lois Daamen, Marc G Besselink
{"title":"Prognostic factors in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and resection: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ammar A Javed, Alyssar Habib, Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Mahip Grewal, Nabiha Mughal, Jin He, Christopher L Wolfgang, Lois Daamen, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are well-established but remain unclear following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine factors associated with OS following NAT in resected PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception till May 2024. Studies that reported univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were included if patients underwent NAT and resection for localized PDAC. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse-variance random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,208 unique articles identified by the search, 92 were included in the meta-analysis. Eighty-five of these were of 'good' and 7 of 'poor' quality. The NAT regimen was described in 84 studies, of which 62 included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX). Margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after NAT were prognostic for OS, while age, sex, perineural invasion, baseline tumor size, and baseline CA19-9 were not. The test for subgroup differences between ypN-substages was not significant in the multivariable model. Neoadjuvant FFX was associated with better survival than other regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis identified margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after NAT as prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected localized PDAC following NAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are well-established but remain unclear following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine factors associated with OS following NAT in resected PDAC.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception till May 2024. Studies that reported univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were included if patients underwent NAT and resection for localized PDAC. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse-variance random-effects models.

Results: Among 2,208 unique articles identified by the search, 92 were included in the meta-analysis. Eighty-five of these were of 'good' and 7 of 'poor' quality. The NAT regimen was described in 84 studies, of which 62 included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX). Margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after NAT were prognostic for OS, while age, sex, perineural invasion, baseline tumor size, and baseline CA19-9 were not. The test for subgroup differences between ypN-substages was not significant in the multivariable model. Neoadjuvant FFX was associated with better survival than other regimens.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after NAT as prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected localized PDAC following NAT.

新辅助治疗和切除术后局部胰腺导管腺癌的预后因素:系统综述和 Meta 分析。
导言:切除的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)总生存期(OS)的预后标志物已得到证实,但新辅助治疗(NAT)后的预后标志物仍不明确。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定与切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)新辅助治疗后OS相关的因素:方法:系统检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库中从开始到2024年5月的所有研究。如果患者因局部 PDAC 而接受 NAT 和切除术,则纳入报告单变量和多变量危险比 (HR) 的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对研究质量进行评估。采用通用逆方差随机效应模型进行了 Meta 分析:在搜索到的 2,208 篇文章中,有 92 篇被纳入荟萃分析。其中 85 篇质量为 "好",7 篇质量为 "差"。84项研究对NAT方案进行了描述,其中62项研究纳入了接受FOLFIRINOX(FFX)治疗的患者。边缘状态、结节性疾病、AJCC T 分期和 NAT 后 CA19-9 的正常化是 OS 的预后指标,而年龄、性别、神经周围侵犯、基线肿瘤大小和基线 CA19-9 则不是。在多变量模型中,ypN-分期之间的亚组差异检验不显著。与其他方案相比,新辅助 FFX 与更好的生存率相关:这项荟萃分析确定了边缘状态、结节病、AJCC T分期以及NAT后CA19-9正常化是NAT后切除局部PDAC患者OS的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信