Identification of Distinct Visual Scan Paths for Pathologists in Rare-Element Search Tasks.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Alana Lopes, Sean Rasmussen, Ryan Au, Vignesh Chakravarthy, Tricia Chinnery, Jaryd Christie, Bojana Djordjevic, Jose A Gomez, Natalie Grindrod, Robert Policelli, Anurag Sharma, Christopher Tran, Joanna C Walsh, Bret Wehrli, Aaron D Ward, Matthew J Cecchini
{"title":"Identification of Distinct Visual Scan Paths for Pathologists in Rare-Element Search Tasks.","authors":"Alana Lopes, Sean Rasmussen, Ryan Au, Vignesh Chakravarthy, Tricia Chinnery, Jaryd Christie, Bojana Djordjevic, Jose A Gomez, Natalie Grindrod, Robert Policelli, Anurag Sharma, Christopher Tran, Joanna C Walsh, Bret Wehrli, Aaron D Ward, Matthew J Cecchini","doi":"10.1177/10668969241294239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe search for rare elements, like mitotic figures, is crucial in pathology. Combining digital pathology with eye-tracking technology allows for the detailed study of how pathologists complete these important tasks.ObjectivesTo determine if pathologists have distinct search characteristics in domain- and nondomain-specific tasks.DesignSix pathologists and six graduate students were recruited as observers. Each observer was given five digital \"Where's Waldo?\" puzzles and asked to search for the Waldo character as a nondomain-specific task. Each pathologist was then given five images of a breast digital pathology slide to search for a single mitotic figure as a domain-specific task. The observers' eye gaze data were collected.ResultsPathologists' median fixation duration was 244 ms, compared to 300 ms for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (<i>P </i>< .001), and compared to 233 ms for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (<i>P </i>= .003). Pathologists' median fixation and saccade rates were 3.17/second and 2.77/second, respectively, compared to 2.61/second and 2.47/second for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (<i>P </i>< .001), and compared to 3.34/second and 3.09/second for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (<i>P </i>= .222 and <i>P </i>= .187, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in their accuracy in identifying the target of their search.ConclusionsWhen searching for rare elements during a nondomain-specific search task, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different compared to nonpathologists, indicating pathologists can rapidly classify the objects of their fixations without compromising accuracy. Further, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different between a domain-specific and nondomain-specific rare-element search task.</p>","PeriodicalId":14416,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"861-870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969241294239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe search for rare elements, like mitotic figures, is crucial in pathology. Combining digital pathology with eye-tracking technology allows for the detailed study of how pathologists complete these important tasks.ObjectivesTo determine if pathologists have distinct search characteristics in domain- and nondomain-specific tasks.DesignSix pathologists and six graduate students were recruited as observers. Each observer was given five digital "Where's Waldo?" puzzles and asked to search for the Waldo character as a nondomain-specific task. Each pathologist was then given five images of a breast digital pathology slide to search for a single mitotic figure as a domain-specific task. The observers' eye gaze data were collected.ResultsPathologists' median fixation duration was 244 ms, compared to 300 ms for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (P < .001), and compared to 233 ms for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (P = .003). Pathologists' median fixation and saccade rates were 3.17/second and 2.77/second, respectively, compared to 2.61/second and 2.47/second for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (P < .001), and compared to 3.34/second and 3.09/second for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (P = .222 and P = .187, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in their accuracy in identifying the target of their search.ConclusionsWhen searching for rare elements during a nondomain-specific search task, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different compared to nonpathologists, indicating pathologists can rapidly classify the objects of their fixations without compromising accuracy. Further, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different between a domain-specific and nondomain-specific rare-element search task.

识别病理学家在稀有元素搜索任务中的不同视觉扫描路径
背景:寻找有丝分裂图等稀有元素在病理学中至关重要。将数字病理学与眼动跟踪技术相结合,可以详细研究病理学家是如何完成这些重要任务的:确定病理学家在特定领域和非特定领域任务中是否具有不同的搜索特征:设计:招募六名病理学家和六名研究生作为观察者。每位观察者都会收到五张数字 "沃尔多在哪里?"拼图,并被要求搜索沃尔多角色,这是一项非特定领域任务。然后给每位病理学家五张乳腺数字病理切片图像,要求他们搜索单个有丝分裂图形,这是一项特定领域任务。研究人员收集了观察者的眼睛注视数据:病理学家的中位固定持续时间为 244 毫秒,而非病理学家搜索 Waldo 的中位固定持续时间为 300 毫秒(P P = .003)。病理学家的中位固定率和囊状移动率分别为 3.17/秒和 2.77/秒,而非病理学家搜索 Waldo 的中位固定率和囊状移动率分别为 2.61/秒和 2.47/秒(P P = .222 和 P = .187)。两组人在确定搜索目标的准确性上没有明显差异:结论:在非特定领域搜索任务中搜索稀有元素时,病理学家的搜索特征与非病理学家相比有本质区别,这表明病理学家可以在不影响准确性的情况下对其固定对象进行快速分类。此外,病理学家在特定领域和非特定领域稀有元素搜索任务中的搜索特征也有本质区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Pathology (IJSP) is a peer-reviewed journal published eight times a year, which offers original research and observations covering all major organ systems, timely reviews of new techniques and procedures, discussions of controversies in surgical pathology, case reports, and images in pathology. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信