A Combination of Artificial Intelligence with Genetic Algorithms on Static Time-Lapse Images Improves Consistency in Blastocyst Assessment, An Interpretable Tool to Automate Human Embryo Evaluation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marco Toschi, Lorena Bori, Jose Celso Rocha, Cristina Hickman, Marcelo Fabio Gouveia Nogueira, Andre Satoshi Ferreira, Murilo Costa Maffeis, Jonas Malmsten, Qiansheng Zhan, Nikica Zaninovic, Marcos Meseguer
{"title":"A Combination of Artificial Intelligence with Genetic Algorithms on Static Time-Lapse Images Improves Consistency in Blastocyst Assessment, An Interpretable Tool to Automate Human Embryo Evaluation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Marco Toschi, Lorena Bori, Jose Celso Rocha, Cristina Hickman, Marcelo Fabio Gouveia Nogueira, Andre Satoshi Ferreira, Murilo Costa Maffeis, Jonas Malmsten, Qiansheng Zhan, Nikica Zaninovic, Marcos Meseguer","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2008339.1510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent times, various algorithms have been developed to assist in the selection of embryos for transfer based on artificial intelligence (AI). Nevertheless, the majority of AI models employed in this context were characterized by a lack of transparency. To address these concerns, we aim to design an interpretable tool to automate human embryo evaluation by combining artificial neural networks (ANNs) and genetic algorithms (GA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 223 human blastocyst time-lapse (TL) images taken at 110 hours post-injection. All the images were evaluated by five embryologists from different clinics in terms of blastocyst expansion (BE), quality of the inner cell mass (ICM), and trophectoderm (TE). The embryo database was used to develop an AI system (70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test) for automate blastocyst assessment. The entire set of images underwent a standardization process, followed by processing and segmentation using Matlab software. The resulting quantified variables were utilized in AI techniques (ANN and GA). Finally, the accuracy and performance of the automation tool was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Then, the level of agreement among embryologists and between embryologists and the AI system was compared with Kappa Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall agreement among embryologists was low (Kappa: 0.4 for BE; and 0.3 for TE and ICM). The AI tool achieved higher consistency (Kappa 0.7 for BE and ICM; and 0.4 for TE). The AI exhibited high accuracy in classifying BE (test 81.5%), ICM (test 78.8%), and TE (test 78.3%) and better performance for BE (AUC 0.888-0.956) than for ICM (AUC 0.605-0.854) and TE (AUC 0.726-0.769) assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our AI tool highlighted the superior consistency of AI compared to human operators in grading blastocyst morphology. This research represents an important step towards fully automating objective embryo evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"18 4","pages":"378-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2008339.1510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent times, various algorithms have been developed to assist in the selection of embryos for transfer based on artificial intelligence (AI). Nevertheless, the majority of AI models employed in this context were characterized by a lack of transparency. To address these concerns, we aim to design an interpretable tool to automate human embryo evaluation by combining artificial neural networks (ANNs) and genetic algorithms (GA).

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 223 human blastocyst time-lapse (TL) images taken at 110 hours post-injection. All the images were evaluated by five embryologists from different clinics in terms of blastocyst expansion (BE), quality of the inner cell mass (ICM), and trophectoderm (TE). The embryo database was used to develop an AI system (70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test) for automate blastocyst assessment. The entire set of images underwent a standardization process, followed by processing and segmentation using Matlab software. The resulting quantified variables were utilized in AI techniques (ANN and GA). Finally, the accuracy and performance of the automation tool was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Then, the level of agreement among embryologists and between embryologists and the AI system was compared with Kappa Index.

Results: The overall agreement among embryologists was low (Kappa: 0.4 for BE; and 0.3 for TE and ICM). The AI tool achieved higher consistency (Kappa 0.7 for BE and ICM; and 0.4 for TE). The AI exhibited high accuracy in classifying BE (test 81.5%), ICM (test 78.8%), and TE (test 78.3%) and better performance for BE (AUC 0.888-0.956) than for ICM (AUC 0.605-0.854) and TE (AUC 0.726-0.769) assessment.

Conclusion: Our AI tool highlighted the superior consistency of AI compared to human operators in grading blastocyst morphology. This research represents an important step towards fully automating objective embryo evaluation.

人工智能与遗传算法在静态延时图像上的结合提高了囊胚评估的一致性,这是一种可解释的人类胚胎自动评估工具:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:近来,各种基于人工智能(AI)的辅助胚胎移植选择算法应运而生。然而,大多数人工智能模型都缺乏透明度。为了解决这些问题,我们旨在设计一种可解释的工具,通过结合人工神经网络(ANN)和遗传算法(GA)来自动评估人类胚胎:这项回顾性队列研究包括 223 张在注射后 110 小时拍摄的人类囊胚延时(TL)图像。来自不同诊所的五位胚胎学家对所有图像进行了囊胚扩张(BE)、内细胞团(ICM)和滋养层(TE)质量评估。胚胎数据库被用来开发一个人工智能系统(70% 训练、15% 验证和 15% 测试),用于自动评估囊胚。整套图像经过标准化处理,然后使用 Matlab 软件进行处理和分割。由此产生的量化变量被用于人工智能技术(ANN 和 GA)。最后,用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)来评估自动化工具的准确性和性能。然后,用 Kappa 指数比较了胚胎学家之间以及胚胎学家与人工智能系统之间的一致程度:结果:胚胎学家之间的总体一致性较低(Kappa:BE 为 0.4;TE 和 ICM 为 0.3)。人工智能工具的一致性更高(BE 和 ICM 的 Kappa 为 0.7;TE 为 0.4)。人工智能在对 BE(测试结果为 81.5%)、ICM(测试结果为 78.8%)和 TE(测试结果为 78.3%)进行分类时表现出较高的准确性,对 BE(AUC 0.888-0.956)的评估结果优于对 ICM(AUC 0.605-0.854)和 TE(AUC 0.726-0.769)的评估结果:我们的人工智能工具与人类操作员相比,在囊胚形态分级方面具有更高的一致性。这项研究是实现客观胚胎评估完全自动化的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信