Understanding Indian Doctors' Attitudes Toward Alcohol Pharmacotherapy and Prescription: A Mediational Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sanjukta Ghosh, Tamonud Modak, Abhijit Ramdas Rozatkar
{"title":"Understanding Indian Doctors' Attitudes Toward Alcohol Pharmacotherapy and Prescription: A Mediational Analysis.","authors":"Sanjukta Ghosh, Tamonud Modak, Abhijit Ramdas Rozatkar","doi":"10.1177/02537176241277527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorder (AUD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Prescription of AUD pharmacotherapies remains low. Attitudes toward AUD pharmacotherapies influence their prescription rates. We conducted an online survey to assess how attitudes modulate the association between knowledge and prescription rates for four commonly used AUD medications among Indian clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent nationwide to Indian physicians between February and April 2023 to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of various AUD medications. An a priori model was defined to indicate the relationship between study variables. Bootstrapped correlation analysis was conducted to determine confidence intervals of the correlation coefficients between knowledge, attitudes, and prescription practices. Additional subgroup analysis was conducted for faculty and private psychiatrists to assess if they prescribed differently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 physicians responded to the survey. Bootstrapped correlation analysis indicated that safety and acceptability played a moderated prescription rates for acamprosate and naltrexone while they mediating role among faculty. For Disulfiram, perceived efficacy had a mediating effect, especially among private psychiatrists. Among faculty, perceived safety negatively mediated Disulfiram prescriptions. There was no indirect effect of attitudes on the association between knowledge and prescription practices for Baclofen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of attitudes varied across medications. For acamprosate and naltrexone, perceived safety and acceptability significantly moderated prescription rates. For Disulfiram, perceived efficacy played a significant mediating effect. Attitudes did not influence Baclofen prescriptions as a whole, but acceptability significantly mediated prescriptions for private psychiatrists. This might indicate that physicians prescribe Baclofen as an ineluctable option.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176241277527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176241277527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Prescription of AUD pharmacotherapies remains low. Attitudes toward AUD pharmacotherapies influence their prescription rates. We conducted an online survey to assess how attitudes modulate the association between knowledge and prescription rates for four commonly used AUD medications among Indian clinicians.

Methods: An online survey was sent nationwide to Indian physicians between February and April 2023 to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of various AUD medications. An a priori model was defined to indicate the relationship between study variables. Bootstrapped correlation analysis was conducted to determine confidence intervals of the correlation coefficients between knowledge, attitudes, and prescription practices. Additional subgroup analysis was conducted for faculty and private psychiatrists to assess if they prescribed differently.

Results: A total of 387 physicians responded to the survey. Bootstrapped correlation analysis indicated that safety and acceptability played a moderated prescription rates for acamprosate and naltrexone while they mediating role among faculty. For Disulfiram, perceived efficacy had a mediating effect, especially among private psychiatrists. Among faculty, perceived safety negatively mediated Disulfiram prescriptions. There was no indirect effect of attitudes on the association between knowledge and prescription practices for Baclofen.

Conclusion: The role of attitudes varied across medications. For acamprosate and naltrexone, perceived safety and acceptability significantly moderated prescription rates. For Disulfiram, perceived efficacy played a significant mediating effect. Attitudes did not influence Baclofen prescriptions as a whole, but acceptability significantly mediated prescriptions for private psychiatrists. This might indicate that physicians prescribe Baclofen as an ineluctable option.

了解印度医生对酒精药物治疗和处方的态度:中介分析。
背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。AUD 药物治疗的处方率仍然很低。对 AUD 药物疗法的态度会影响其处方率。我们开展了一项在线调查,以评估印度临床医生的态度如何调节四种常用 AUD 药物的知识与处方率之间的关联:方法:2023 年 2 月至 4 月期间,我们在全国范围内对印度医生进行了在线调查,以评估他们对各种 AUD 药物的知识、态度和实践。定义了一个先验模型来说明研究变量之间的关系。进行了引导相关分析,以确定知识、态度和处方实践之间相关系数的置信区间。此外,还对教职员工和私人精神科医生进行了分组分析,以评估他们的处方是否有所不同:共有 387 名医生回复了调查。Bootstrapped相关性分析表明,安全性和可接受性对阿坎酸和纳曲酮的处方率起着调节作用,而对教职员工则起着中介作用。对于双硫仑,疗效感知具有中介作用,尤其是在私人精神病医生中。在教师中,安全感对双硫仑的处方起负向调节作用。态度对巴氯芬知识和处方做法之间的关联没有间接影响:结论:态度在不同药物中的作用各不相同。对于阿坎酸和纳曲酮,安全性和可接受性在很大程度上调节了处方率。对于双硫仑,疗效感知具有明显的调节作用。总体而言,态度并不影响巴氯芬的处方量,但可接受性对私人精神科医生的处方量有明显的调节作用。这可能表明,医生将巴氯芬作为一种不可避免的选择来处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信