Video laryngoscopy in neonate and infant intubation-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ilari Kuitunen, Kati Räsänen, Tuomas T Huttunen
{"title":"Video laryngoscopy in neonate and infant intubation-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ilari Kuitunen, Kati Räsänen, Tuomas T Huttunen","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05839-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to analyze the effect of video laryngoscopy on intubation success, time to intubation, and adverse events in infants and neonates. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, for which a neonates (age less than 29 days) and infants (age less than 365 days) needing to be intubated were included. The main outcomes were first attempt success rate in the intubation, time to intubation, and adverse events. Evidence certainty was assessed according to GRADE. We included 13 studies. Seven studies with 897 patients focused on neonates, and the first attempt success rate was higher in the video laryngoscopy group (RR 1.18, CI: 1.03-1.36). Six studies included 1039 infants, and the success rate was higher in the video laryngoscopy group (RR 1.06, CI: 1.00-1.20). Time to intubation was assessed in 11 trials, and there was no difference between the groups (mean difference 1.2 s, CI - 2.2 s to + 4.6 s). Odds of desaturation (OR 0.62, CI 0.42-0.93) and nasal/oral trauma (OR 0.24, CI 0.07-0.85) were lower in the video laryngoscopy group. Evidence certainties varied between moderate and low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found moderate certainty evidence that the use of video laryngoscopy improves first attempt success rates in neonate and infant intubations, while the time to intubation did not differ between video and direct laryngoscopy groups. Further studies are still needed to improve the first intubation success rates in neonates.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improve first-pass intubation success rates and reduce time to intubation in adults and older children.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Video laryngoscopy improved the first attempt intubation success rates both in neonates and in infants. • Video laryngoscopy did not increase the time to intubation, and it was associated with less adverse events than direct laryngoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05839-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to analyze the effect of video laryngoscopy on intubation success, time to intubation, and adverse events in infants and neonates. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, for which a neonates (age less than 29 days) and infants (age less than 365 days) needing to be intubated were included. The main outcomes were first attempt success rate in the intubation, time to intubation, and adverse events. Evidence certainty was assessed according to GRADE. We included 13 studies. Seven studies with 897 patients focused on neonates, and the first attempt success rate was higher in the video laryngoscopy group (RR 1.18, CI: 1.03-1.36). Six studies included 1039 infants, and the success rate was higher in the video laryngoscopy group (RR 1.06, CI: 1.00-1.20). Time to intubation was assessed in 11 trials, and there was no difference between the groups (mean difference 1.2 s, CI - 2.2 s to + 4.6 s). Odds of desaturation (OR 0.62, CI 0.42-0.93) and nasal/oral trauma (OR 0.24, CI 0.07-0.85) were lower in the video laryngoscopy group. Evidence certainties varied between moderate and low.

Conclusion: We found moderate certainty evidence that the use of video laryngoscopy improves first attempt success rates in neonate and infant intubations, while the time to intubation did not differ between video and direct laryngoscopy groups. Further studies are still needed to improve the first intubation success rates in neonates.

What is known: • Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improve first-pass intubation success rates and reduce time to intubation in adults and older children.

What is new: • Video laryngoscopy improved the first attempt intubation success rates both in neonates and in infants. • Video laryngoscopy did not increase the time to intubation, and it was associated with less adverse events than direct laryngoscopy.

新生儿和婴儿插管中的视频喉镜检查--系统回顾和荟萃分析。
我们旨在分析视频喉镜对婴儿和新生儿插管成功率、插管时间和不良事件的影响。我们对需要插管的新生儿(年龄小于 29 天)和婴儿(年龄小于 365 天)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要结果包括首次尝试插管成功率、插管时间和不良事件。根据 GRADE 对证据的确定性进行了评估。我们纳入了 13 项研究。七项研究共纳入 897 名患者,主要针对新生儿,视频喉镜组的首次尝试成功率更高(RR 1.18,CI:1.03-1.36)。六项研究纳入了 1039 名婴儿,视频喉镜组的成功率更高(RR 1.06,CI:1.00-1.20)。11 项试验对插管时间进行了评估,结果显示两组之间没有差异(平均差异为 1.2 秒,CI - 2.2 秒至 + 4.6 秒)。视频喉镜组患者出现不饱和(OR 0.62,CI 0.42-0.93)和鼻/口腔创伤(OR 0.24,CI 0.07-0.85)的几率较低。证据确定性介于中度和低度之间:我们发现中度确定性证据表明,使用视频喉镜可提高新生儿和婴儿首次尝试插管的成功率,而视频组和直接喉镜组的插管时间并无差异。要提高新生儿的首次插管成功率,仍需进一步研究:- 视频喉镜检查已被证明可提高成人和年长儿童的首次插管成功率并缩短插管时间:- 新发现:视频喉镜检查提高了新生儿和婴儿首次尝试插管的成功率。- 视频喉镜检查不会增加插管时间,与直接喉镜检查相比,视频喉镜检查的不良反应较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信