Diagnostic Accuracy of Subjective Features and Physical Examination Tests for Morton Neuroma: A Systematic Review.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241291055
Mark Pitcher, Andrea Moulson, David Pitcher, Anthony Herbland, Grad Cert, Mindy C Cairns
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Subjective Features and Physical Examination Tests for Morton Neuroma: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mark Pitcher, Andrea Moulson, David Pitcher, Anthony Herbland, Grad Cert, Mindy C Cairns","doi":"10.1177/24730114241291055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morton neuroma (MN) is a common pathology with many reported subjective features and physical examination tests. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of subjective features and physical examination tests for MN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Opengrey, PEDro, PsycINFO, Scopus and Trials register were searched in January 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion using the following criteria: (1) prospective or retrospective cohort studies, (2) participants aged ≥18 years with suspected MN, (3) primary data allowing construction of 2 × 2 diagnostic table or reported sensitivity and specificity figures, (4) diagnosis of MN using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, surgery, positive response to steroid and/or anesthetic injection, and (5) in English or translatable. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1170 results, of which 9 were included in this systematic review. Narrative synthesis revealed that subjective clicking reported by a patient was highly specific (0.96) and had a high positive likelihood ratio (13.14). The modified webspace tenderness test (thumb index finger squeeze test) was highly sensitive (0.96) with a low negative likelihood ratio (0.04). The commonly reported feeling of \"walking on a pebble\" and \"burning pain\" had sensitivities of 43% to 53% and 54% to 57% and associated specificities of 52% and 48%, respectively.Only 1 study had low risk of bias. The review was limited by the number of studies that included few or no patients without MN, and the impact this had on the ability to calculate diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is strong evidence that clicking reported by a patient rules in MN and that the modified webspace tenderness test rules out MN when negative.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 4","pages":"24730114241291055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241291055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morton neuroma (MN) is a common pathology with many reported subjective features and physical examination tests. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of subjective features and physical examination tests for MN.

Methods: CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Opengrey, PEDro, PsycINFO, Scopus and Trials register were searched in January 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion using the following criteria: (1) prospective or retrospective cohort studies, (2) participants aged ≥18 years with suspected MN, (3) primary data allowing construction of 2 × 2 diagnostic table or reported sensitivity and specificity figures, (4) diagnosis of MN using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, surgery, positive response to steroid and/or anesthetic injection, and (5) in English or translatable. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

Results: The search yielded 1170 results, of which 9 were included in this systematic review. Narrative synthesis revealed that subjective clicking reported by a patient was highly specific (0.96) and had a high positive likelihood ratio (13.14). The modified webspace tenderness test (thumb index finger squeeze test) was highly sensitive (0.96) with a low negative likelihood ratio (0.04). The commonly reported feeling of "walking on a pebble" and "burning pain" had sensitivities of 43% to 53% and 54% to 57% and associated specificities of 52% and 48%, respectively.Only 1 study had low risk of bias. The review was limited by the number of studies that included few or no patients without MN, and the impact this had on the ability to calculate diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: There is strong evidence that clicking reported by a patient rules in MN and that the modified webspace tenderness test rules out MN when negative.

莫顿神经瘤主观特征和体格检查测试的诊断准确性:系统性综述。
背景:莫顿神经瘤(Morton neuroma,MN)是一种常见病症,有许多主观特征和体格检查测试报告。本系统综述旨在研究莫顿神经瘤的主观特征和体格检查测试的诊断准确性:方法:检索了 2021 年 1 月的 CINAHL、CENTRAL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed、Opengrey、PEDro、PsycINFO、Scopus 和试验登记册。两名审稿人根据以下标准独立筛选纳入研究:(1)前瞻性或回顾性队列研究;(2)年龄≥18 岁、疑似 MN 的参与者;(3)可构建 2 × 2 诊断表或报告敏感性和特异性数据的主要数据;(4)使用磁共振成像、超声波检查、手术、类固醇和/或麻醉剂注射阳性反应诊断 MN;(5)英语或可翻译。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)对纳入研究的质量进行评估:结果:搜索结果有 1170 项,其中 9 项被纳入本系统综述。叙述性综合显示,患者报告的主观点击具有高度特异性(0.96)和较高的阳性似然比(13.14)。改良的蹼间触痛试验(拇指食指挤压试验)具有高度敏感性(0.96)和较低的阴性似然比(0.04)。通常报告的 "走在鹅卵石上 "和 "灼痛 "感觉的敏感性分别为 43% 至 53% 和 54% 至 57%,相关特异性分别为 52% 和 48%。只有 1 项研究的偏倚风险较低。由于纳入的无 MN 患者较少或没有纳入,这对计算诊断准确性的能力产生了影响,因此审查受到了一定的限制:有确凿证据表明,患者报告的点击可排除 MN,而改良的蹼间触痛试验在阴性时可排除 MN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信