Are There Shortages and Regional Disparities in Lecanemab Treatment Facilities? A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329241299312
Kazuki Ohashi, Ikuko Takahashi-Iwata, Zhao Jieyu, Ken Sakushima, Ichiro Yabe, Katsuhiko Ogasawara
{"title":"Are There Shortages and Regional Disparities in Lecanemab Treatment Facilities? A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Kazuki Ohashi, Ikuko Takahashi-Iwata, Zhao Jieyu, Ken Sakushima, Ichiro Yabe, Katsuhiko Ogasawara","doi":"10.1177/11786329241299312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, affecting 70% of patients with dementia. In Japan, over 5 million people aged 65 years and older had dementia in 2018, and this figure is expected to rise to 25% to 30% of this age group by 2045. In Japan, lecanemab, which was approved in 2023, is expected to be a new treatment for AD. However, lecanemab requires stringent management, including amyloid PET scans and MRI monitoring, necessitating specialized facilities, creating concerns regarding the lack of treatment facilities and poor treatment access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed spatial accessibility to lecanemab in Hokkaido, Japan, using geographic information system data. Hospitals were categorized into 3 scenarios based on their capacity to meet the treatment criteria. Service area analysis in each scenario evaluated the population coverage within 30-, 60-, and 120-minute travel times. The inverted two-step floating catchment area method was used to calculate the potential high-demand areas index (PHDI) for each hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Population coverage ranged from 56% to 97%, depending on the scenario and travel time. Coverage for the most feasible scenario (Scenario 1) was 56%, 73.9%, and 88.3% within 30, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively. Northern and southern Hokkaido had the lowest coverage. PHDI analysis identified high-demand areas, with Sapporo facing potential overcapacity issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lecanemab highlights the need for strategic resource allocation to enhance accessibility and capacity. Establishing additional treatment centers, particularly in areas with poor accessibility and capacity, is crucial to maximize the benefits of treatment for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"17 ","pages":"11786329241299312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241299312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, affecting 70% of patients with dementia. In Japan, over 5 million people aged 65 years and older had dementia in 2018, and this figure is expected to rise to 25% to 30% of this age group by 2045. In Japan, lecanemab, which was approved in 2023, is expected to be a new treatment for AD. However, lecanemab requires stringent management, including amyloid PET scans and MRI monitoring, necessitating specialized facilities, creating concerns regarding the lack of treatment facilities and poor treatment access.

Methods: This study assessed spatial accessibility to lecanemab in Hokkaido, Japan, using geographic information system data. Hospitals were categorized into 3 scenarios based on their capacity to meet the treatment criteria. Service area analysis in each scenario evaluated the population coverage within 30-, 60-, and 120-minute travel times. The inverted two-step floating catchment area method was used to calculate the potential high-demand areas index (PHDI) for each hospital.

Results: Population coverage ranged from 56% to 97%, depending on the scenario and travel time. Coverage for the most feasible scenario (Scenario 1) was 56%, 73.9%, and 88.3% within 30, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively. Northern and southern Hokkaido had the lowest coverage. PHDI analysis identified high-demand areas, with Sapporo facing potential overcapacity issues.

Conclusion: Lecanemab highlights the need for strategic resource allocation to enhance accessibility and capacity. Establishing additional treatment centers, particularly in areas with poor accessibility and capacity, is crucial to maximize the benefits of treatment for dementia.

来卡尼单抗治疗机构是否存在短缺和地区差异?一项横断面研究。
简介阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的痴呆症类型,影响着 70% 的痴呆症患者。在日本,2018 年 65 岁及以上的痴呆症患者超过 500 万,预计到 2045 年,这一数字将上升至该年龄组的 25% 至 30%。在日本,2023 年获批的 lecanemab有望成为治疗 AD 的新疗法。然而,莱卡奈单抗需要严格的管理,包括淀粉样蛋白PET扫描和核磁共振成像监测,因此需要专门的设施,这就造成了治疗设施缺乏和治疗可及性差的问题:本研究利用地理信息系统数据评估了日本北海道莱卡奈单抗的空间可及性。根据医院满足治疗标准的能力,将医院分为三种情况。每个方案的服务区分析评估了 30 分钟、60 分钟和 120 分钟行程内的人口覆盖率。采用倒置两步浮动集水区法计算每家医院的潜在高需求区域指数(PHDI):根据不同的方案和旅行时间,人口覆盖率从 56% 到 97% 不等。最可行的方案(方案 1)在 30、60 和 120 分钟内的覆盖率分别为 56%、73.9% 和 88.3%。北海道北部和南部的覆盖率最低。PHDI 分析确定了高需求地区,其中札幌面临着潜在的产能过剩问题:结论:Lecanemab 强调了战略性资源分配的必要性,以提高可及性和治疗能力。建立更多的治疗中心,尤其是在可及性和治疗能力较差的地区,对于最大限度地提高痴呆症治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信