Drug Survival and Safety of Biosimilars Compared with Originator Adalimumab for Psoriasis: A Multinational Cohort Study.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Duc Binh Phan, Hugo Jourdain, Miguel Angel Descalzo-Gallego, Alicia González-Quesada, Mahmoud Zureik, Raquel Rivera-Díaz, Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba, Mark Lunt, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Emilie Sbidian, Richard B Warren, Zenas Z N Yiu
{"title":"Drug Survival and Safety of Biosimilars Compared with Originator Adalimumab for Psoriasis: A Multinational Cohort Study.","authors":"Duc Binh Phan, Hugo Jourdain, Miguel Angel Descalzo-Gallego, Alicia González-Quesada, Mahmoud Zureik, Raquel Rivera-Díaz, Antonio Sahuquillo-Torralba, Mark Lunt, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Emilie Sbidian, Richard B Warren, Zenas Z N Yiu","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of evidence under routine clinical settings limited the widespread adoption of adalimumab biosimilars for psoriasis treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the drug survival and safety of adalimumab biosimilars to Humira for psoriasis treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prevalent new-user cohort study using data from the French National Health Data System (SNDS), the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), and the Spanish Registry of Systemic Therapy in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM). Adalimumab-naïve patients initiating adalimumab biosimilars (new users) were compared with Humira new users. Patients switching from Humira to biosimilars (switchers) were compared with those who continued Humira treatment. Patients were matched 1:1 based on previous adalimumab exposure time to create equal-sized cohorts of biosimilar and Humira users. Co-primary outcomes included drug discontinuation and serious adverse events (SAEs). Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Meta-analyses using random effect models were performed to combine results from 3 databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7387 biosimilar new users and 3654 switchers were matched and compared with Humira users. No differences in all-cause discontinuation were found between biosimilars and Humira new users (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.04). Switching from Humira to biosimilars was associated with a higher discontinuation rate compared to remaining on Humira (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19-1.52). Similar results were observed for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness or adverse events. Risks of SAEs were similar between biosimilar new users and Humira new users (Incidence rate ratio IRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.05) or between switchers and continuous Humira users (IRR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83-1.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adalimumab biosimilars can be considered viable alternatives to Humira for new patients with comparable effectiveness and safety. However, due to the higher likelihood of discontinuation, patients who switch from Humira to biosimilars may require closer monitoring and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae454","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of evidence under routine clinical settings limited the widespread adoption of adalimumab biosimilars for psoriasis treatment.

Objective: This study compared the drug survival and safety of adalimumab biosimilars to Humira for psoriasis treatment.

Methods: We conducted a prevalent new-user cohort study using data from the French National Health Data System (SNDS), the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), and the Spanish Registry of Systemic Therapy in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM). Adalimumab-naïve patients initiating adalimumab biosimilars (new users) were compared with Humira new users. Patients switching from Humira to biosimilars (switchers) were compared with those who continued Humira treatment. Patients were matched 1:1 based on previous adalimumab exposure time to create equal-sized cohorts of biosimilar and Humira users. Co-primary outcomes included drug discontinuation and serious adverse events (SAEs). Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Meta-analyses using random effect models were performed to combine results from 3 databases.

Results: 7387 biosimilar new users and 3654 switchers were matched and compared with Humira users. No differences in all-cause discontinuation were found between biosimilars and Humira new users (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.04). Switching from Humira to biosimilars was associated with a higher discontinuation rate compared to remaining on Humira (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19-1.52). Similar results were observed for discontinuation due to ineffectiveness or adverse events. Risks of SAEs were similar between biosimilar new users and Humira new users (Incidence rate ratio IRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.05) or between switchers and continuous Humira users (IRR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83-1.01).

Conclusion: Adalimumab biosimilars can be considered viable alternatives to Humira for new patients with comparable effectiveness and safety. However, due to the higher likelihood of discontinuation, patients who switch from Humira to biosimilars may require closer monitoring and support.

生物仿制药与原研药阿达木单抗治疗银屑病的药物生存期和安全性比较:一项多国队列研究。
背景:阿达木单抗生物仿制药被广泛应用于银屑病治疗,但在常规临床环境下缺乏相关证据:缺乏常规临床环境下的证据限制了阿达木单抗生物类似物在银屑病治疗中的广泛应用:本研究比较了阿达木单抗生物仿制药与Humira治疗银屑病的药物存活率和安全性:我们利用法国国家健康数据系统(SNDS)、英国皮肤科医师协会生物制剂和免疫调节剂登记处(BADBIR)以及西班牙银屑病系统治疗登记处(BIOBADADERM)的数据,开展了一项普遍的新用户队列研究。开始使用阿达木单抗生物仿制药的阿达木单抗新患者(新用户)与Humira新用户进行了比较。从Humira转用生物仿制药的患者(转换者)与继续接受Humira治疗的患者进行了比较。根据患者之前接触阿达木单抗的时间进行1:1配对,以建立同等规模的生物仿制药使用者队列和Humira使用者队列。共同主要结果包括停药和严重不良事件(SAE)。使用Cox比例危险模型计算危险比(HR)。使用随机效应模型进行了元分析,以综合 3 个数据库的结果:对7387名生物类似药新用户和3654名转换用户进行了配对,并与Humira用户进行了比较。结果发现,生物仿制药新用户与Humira新用户在全因停药方面没有差异(HR:0.99,95% CI:0.94-1.04)。与继续使用 Humira 相比,从 Humira 转用生物仿制药的停药率更高(HR:1.35,95% CI:1.19-1.52)。因疗效不佳或不良事件而停药的情况也有类似结果。生物类似物新用户与Humira新用户(发病率比IRR:0.91,95% CI:0.80-1.05)或转换者与持续使用Humira者(发病率比IRR:0.92,95% CI:0.83-1.01)的SAE风险相似:结论:阿达木单抗生物仿制药可被视为新患者的可行替代品,其疗效和安全性与Humira相当。然而,由于停药的可能性较高,从Humira转用生物仿制药的患者可能需要更密切的监测和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信