Changes in Emotion Regulation During the Course of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: Effects on Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Binge Eating Across Two Samples.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lauren M Harris, Emily R Weiss, Margaret T Davis, Thomas Alex Daniel, Victoria R Hart-Derrick, Sarah Barnes, Chelsea D Cawood
{"title":"Changes in Emotion Regulation During the Course of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: Effects on Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Binge Eating Across Two Samples.","authors":"Lauren M Harris, Emily R Weiss, Margaret T Davis, Thomas Alex Daniel, Victoria R Hart-Derrick, Sarah Barnes, Chelsea D Cawood","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing harmful behaviours associated with emotion dysregulation, including non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and binge eating. It has been hypothesized that the effects of DBT on NSSI and binge eating are the result of improvements in emotion regulation (ER); however, the extent to which changes in ER account for reductions in these behaviours is unclear. The present study leverages two unique clinical samples to examine the degree to which changes in ER influence changes in the frequency of NSSI and binge eating over the course of DBT. Participants included 189 Veterans receiving outpatient DBT and 117 civilians enrolled in a DBT Intensive Outpatient Program. Analyses examined changes in ER, binge eating and NSSI over the course of treatment, as well as the extent to which NSSI and binge eating frequency were influenced by changes in ER. In the Veteran sample, DBT led to improvements in ER abilities and significant reductions in NSSI and binge eating; however, changes in ER did not account for observed reductions in NSSI or binge eating. In the civilian sample, the effects of DBT on ER, NSSI and binge eating were nonsignificant. Our findings suggest that ER may not be the only mechanism through which DBT exerts its effects on NSSI and binge eating. The effects of DBT on ER and self-damaging behaviours may vary based on factors such as treatment setting, time in treatment and clinical severity of the sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 6","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing harmful behaviours associated with emotion dysregulation, including non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and binge eating. It has been hypothesized that the effects of DBT on NSSI and binge eating are the result of improvements in emotion regulation (ER); however, the extent to which changes in ER account for reductions in these behaviours is unclear. The present study leverages two unique clinical samples to examine the degree to which changes in ER influence changes in the frequency of NSSI and binge eating over the course of DBT. Participants included 189 Veterans receiving outpatient DBT and 117 civilians enrolled in a DBT Intensive Outpatient Program. Analyses examined changes in ER, binge eating and NSSI over the course of treatment, as well as the extent to which NSSI and binge eating frequency were influenced by changes in ER. In the Veteran sample, DBT led to improvements in ER abilities and significant reductions in NSSI and binge eating; however, changes in ER did not account for observed reductions in NSSI or binge eating. In the civilian sample, the effects of DBT on ER, NSSI and binge eating were nonsignificant. Our findings suggest that ER may not be the only mechanism through which DBT exerts its effects on NSSI and binge eating. The effects of DBT on ER and self-damaging behaviours may vary based on factors such as treatment setting, time in treatment and clinical severity of the sample.

辩证行为疗法过程中情绪调节的变化:两个样本对非自杀性自伤和暴饮暴食的影响。
辩证行为疗法(DBT)在减少与情绪失调有关的有害行为(包括非自杀性自伤(NSSI)和暴食)方面已被证明是有效的。有人假设,DBT 对 NSSI 和暴饮暴食的影响是情绪调节(ER)改善的结果;然而,ER 的变化在多大程度上导致了这些行为的减少还不清楚。本研究利用两个独特的临床样本来研究在 DBT 治疗过程中,ER 的变化在多大程度上影响了 NSSI 和暴食频率的变化。参与者包括 189 名接受门诊 DBT 的退伍军人和 117 名参加 DBT 强化门诊项目的平民。分析检验了在治疗过程中急诊室、暴饮暴食和 NSSI 的变化,以及 NSSI 和暴饮暴食频率受急诊室变化影响的程度。在退伍军人样本中,DBT 改善了应急反应能力,并显著减少了 NSSI 和暴饮暴食;然而,应急反应的变化并不能解释观察到的 NSSI 或暴饮暴食的减少。在平民样本中,DBT 对ER、NSSI 和暴食的影响并不显著。我们的研究结果表明,ER 可能不是 DBT 对 NSSI 和暴食产生影响的唯一机制。DBT 对 ER 和自我损害行为的影响可能因治疗环境、治疗时间和样本的临床严重程度等因素而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信