The development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Yifan Huang, Yinling Zhang, Xinmu Hu, Wenqi Yang, Xiaoqin Mai
{"title":"The development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism.","authors":"Yifan Huang, Yinling Zhang, Xinmu Hu, Wenqi Yang, Xiaoqin Mai","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various scholars have discussed the influence of group membership on cooperative behaviors in adult samples. Nonetheless, the developmental trajectories of related biases from middle childhood and early adolescence remain to be explored. Using the one-shot 4-player public goods game and inducing group membership awareness by school affiliation, we investigated the effects of group membership of imaginary partners on cooperation (Experiment 1) and cooperative norm enforcement (Experiment 2) in children and adolescents across fourth (N = 106, Mage = 9.53 years, 57 girls), sixth (N = 109, Mage = 11.46 years, 54 girls) and eighth grades (N = 102, Mage = 13.22 years, 47 girls). In Experiment 1, participants were first-party players and showed higher cooperation with in-group members (i.e., players from the same school) than out-group members (i.e., from other schools); the mediating role of cooperative expectations in in-group favoritism in cooperation was observed only among fourth and sixth graders. In Experiment 2, participants were third-party executors (i.e., could punish either in-group and out-group free-riders), and results showed that fourth and sixth graders were more lenient with in-group violators; eighth graders showed no evident bias in punishment. These findings depict a developmental pattern of decline in in-group favoritism regarding cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Cooperative expectations mediated the effect of group membership on cooperation only among younger students, indicating that divergent mechanisms underlie cooperative bias between groups in different grades. The discussions suggest that the understanding of norms of both cooperation and equality developed during this period.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"104608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various scholars have discussed the influence of group membership on cooperative behaviors in adult samples. Nonetheless, the developmental trajectories of related biases from middle childhood and early adolescence remain to be explored. Using the one-shot 4-player public goods game and inducing group membership awareness by school affiliation, we investigated the effects of group membership of imaginary partners on cooperation (Experiment 1) and cooperative norm enforcement (Experiment 2) in children and adolescents across fourth (N = 106, Mage = 9.53 years, 57 girls), sixth (N = 109, Mage = 11.46 years, 54 girls) and eighth grades (N = 102, Mage = 13.22 years, 47 girls). In Experiment 1, participants were first-party players and showed higher cooperation with in-group members (i.e., players from the same school) than out-group members (i.e., from other schools); the mediating role of cooperative expectations in in-group favoritism in cooperation was observed only among fourth and sixth graders. In Experiment 2, participants were third-party executors (i.e., could punish either in-group and out-group free-riders), and results showed that fourth and sixth graders were more lenient with in-group violators; eighth graders showed no evident bias in punishment. These findings depict a developmental pattern of decline in in-group favoritism regarding cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Cooperative expectations mediated the effect of group membership on cooperation only among younger students, indicating that divergent mechanisms underlie cooperative bias between groups in different grades. The discussions suggest that the understanding of norms of both cooperation and equality developed during this period.

儿童和青少年合作与合作规范执行的发展:群体内偏袒的作用。
许多学者都讨论过在成人样本中群体成员身份对合作行为的影响。然而,相关偏差在童年中期和青少年早期的发展轨迹仍有待探索。我们利用一局四人公共物品游戏,并通过学校归属诱导群体成员意识,研究了假想伙伴的群体成员身份对四年级(106人,年龄=9.53岁,57名女生)、六年级(109人,年龄=11.46岁,54名女生)和八年级(102人,年龄=13.22岁,47名女生)儿童和青少年合作(实验1)和合作规范执行(实验2)的影响。在实验 1 中,被试是第一方参与者,他们与同组成员(即来自同一所学校的参与者)的合作程度高于与外组成员(即来自其他学校的参与者)的合作程度;只有在四年级和六年级学生中观察到了合作期望对同组偏好在合作中的中介作用。在实验 2 中,参与者是第三方执行者(即可以惩罚组内和组外的自由闯入者),结果显示四年级和六年级学生对组内违规者更宽容;八年级学生在惩罚方面没有表现出明显的偏差。这些研究结果表明,从童年中期到青少年早期,在合作和合作规范执行方面,群体内偏好程度呈下降趋势。只有在低年级学生中,合作期望对群体成员身份对合作的影响起到了中介作用,这表明不同年级群体之间的合作偏差是由不同的机制造成的。讨论表明,对合作和平等规范的理解是在这一时期形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信