Why they take the risk to perform a direct left turn at intersections: A data-driven framework for cyclist violation modeling.

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Hui Bi, Xuejun Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Hui Gao, Zhirui Ye
{"title":"Why they take the risk to perform a direct left turn at intersections: A data-driven framework for cyclist violation modeling.","authors":"Hui Bi, Xuejun Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Hui Gao, Zhirui Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bicycle crashes at intersection areas are posed a worrying traffic safety issue, and one of the main reasons for bicycle crashes is failing to avoid conflicts with motor vehicles and other bicycles. Clearly, cyclists are more exposed to risk if they perform a direct left turn (DLT) being mixed with left-turning vehicle under a left-turn phase. Owing to the lack of exposure data, the detection of DLT event and the mechanism behind the risky riding behavior have yet to be discovered. To bridge these gaps, this study proposes a DLT detection framework based on bike sharing trajectories. Moreover, this study seeks to understand the contributing factors to DLT behavior using the random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPLHMV) to account for unobserved heterogeneity in the DLT cases dataset. Statistical analysis shows that DLT is most likely to occur on weekdays during peak periods under large commuting demand. As to what caused the DLT violations, law-obeying cyclists are more susceptible to external events, while risk-taking cyclists are subtly undermined by their habits. In addition, the model of RPLHMV reveals several significant contributing factors to the propensity of DLT violations, such as event time, available passing time for left-turning bicycles, and average cycling speed, whereas the indicator variables of actual waiting time, available passing space for left-turning bicycles, and preference for DLT violation become the emerging influential variables. This study is expected to help better understand DLT occurrence and propose countermeasures more efficiently for reducing cyclists' DLT rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"209 ","pages":"107846"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107846","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bicycle crashes at intersection areas are posed a worrying traffic safety issue, and one of the main reasons for bicycle crashes is failing to avoid conflicts with motor vehicles and other bicycles. Clearly, cyclists are more exposed to risk if they perform a direct left turn (DLT) being mixed with left-turning vehicle under a left-turn phase. Owing to the lack of exposure data, the detection of DLT event and the mechanism behind the risky riding behavior have yet to be discovered. To bridge these gaps, this study proposes a DLT detection framework based on bike sharing trajectories. Moreover, this study seeks to understand the contributing factors to DLT behavior using the random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPLHMV) to account for unobserved heterogeneity in the DLT cases dataset. Statistical analysis shows that DLT is most likely to occur on weekdays during peak periods under large commuting demand. As to what caused the DLT violations, law-obeying cyclists are more susceptible to external events, while risk-taking cyclists are subtly undermined by their habits. In addition, the model of RPLHMV reveals several significant contributing factors to the propensity of DLT violations, such as event time, available passing time for left-turning bicycles, and average cycling speed, whereas the indicator variables of actual waiting time, available passing space for left-turning bicycles, and preference for DLT violation become the emerging influential variables. This study is expected to help better understand DLT occurrence and propose countermeasures more efficiently for reducing cyclists' DLT rate.

他们为何冒险在交叉路口直接左转?数据驱动的骑车人违规行为建模框架。
交叉路口区域的自行车碰撞事故是一个令人担忧的交通安全问题,而自行车碰撞事故的主要原因之一就是未能避免与机动车和其他自行车的冲突。很明显,如果自行车在左转阶段与左转车辆混合在一起进行直接左转(DLT),则面临的风险更大。由于缺乏风险暴露数据,DLT 事件的检测和风险骑行行为背后的机制仍有待发现。为了填补这些空白,本研究提出了一个基于共享单车轨迹的 DLT 检测框架。此外,本研究还试图利用具有均值和方差异质性的随机参数 logit 模型(RPLHMV)来解释 DLT 案例数据集中未观察到的异质性,从而了解 DLT 行为的诱因。统计分析显示,在通勤需求较大的平日高峰期,最有可能出现大排长龙现象。至于是什么原因导致了违反限行规定,守法的骑车人更容易受到外部事件的影响,而冒险的骑车人则受到其习惯的微妙影响。此外,RPLHMV 模型揭示了几个导致违反限行规定的重要因素,如事件时间、左转自行车的可用通行时间和平均骑行速度,而实际等待时间、左转自行车的可用通行空间和违反限行规定的偏好等指标变量则成为新的影响变量。这项研究有望帮助更好地了解 DLT 的发生情况,并更有效地提出对策,以降低骑车者的 DLT 发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信