Exploring the response of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services to future land use changes in the hilly red soil region of Southern China.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Minglei Wang, Xiaoyan Wang, Wenjiao Shi
{"title":"Exploring the response of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services to future land use changes in the hilly red soil region of Southern China.","authors":"Minglei Wang, Xiaoyan Wang, Wenjiao Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on the potential disruptions that future land use changes may have on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) in the ecologically fragile region of hilly red soil region (HRSR) are still lacking. We employed multi-source observational data to project the land use patterns expected for the year 2035 in Jiangxi Province - a typical HRSR in China - across three specific scenarios: nature development (ND), economic development (ED), and ecological protection (EP). Through the integration of the InVEST model, correlation analysis, and geographically weighted regression methods, we evaluated habitat quality, soil conservation, water yield, and soil conservation, as well as the associated trade-offs/synergies among ESs. The results showed that the built-up land will continue to increase and occupy a large amount of cropland and woodland, resulting in a 0.79-1.96% reduction for the above four ESs under ND scenario. Under the ED scenario, the cropland and built-up land will increase by 2.95% and 12.00%, respectively, and most of them will convert from woodland, which will reduce ESs by 1.07-1.99%. Under the EP scenario, the expansion rate of built-up land will slow down and woodland will increase by 1.55%, leading to a 0.02-1.58% increase in ESs relative to the ED and ND scenarios. In addition, there were clear trade-offs observed in the ES pairs related to the water yield, while other ES pairs showed synergies. The proportions of counties that will experience changes in trade-off intensity, synergy intensity and the direction of trade-offs/synergies are expected to be 1-31%, 1-47% and 1-37%, respectively, from 2010 to 2035 under different scenarios. The study can provide valuable insights for ecological managers in HRSR in developing land use management strategies that optimize the mutual benefits of various ESs according to local conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"372 ","pages":"123283"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on the potential disruptions that future land use changes may have on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) in the ecologically fragile region of hilly red soil region (HRSR) are still lacking. We employed multi-source observational data to project the land use patterns expected for the year 2035 in Jiangxi Province - a typical HRSR in China - across three specific scenarios: nature development (ND), economic development (ED), and ecological protection (EP). Through the integration of the InVEST model, correlation analysis, and geographically weighted regression methods, we evaluated habitat quality, soil conservation, water yield, and soil conservation, as well as the associated trade-offs/synergies among ESs. The results showed that the built-up land will continue to increase and occupy a large amount of cropland and woodland, resulting in a 0.79-1.96% reduction for the above four ESs under ND scenario. Under the ED scenario, the cropland and built-up land will increase by 2.95% and 12.00%, respectively, and most of them will convert from woodland, which will reduce ESs by 1.07-1.99%. Under the EP scenario, the expansion rate of built-up land will slow down and woodland will increase by 1.55%, leading to a 0.02-1.58% increase in ESs relative to the ED and ND scenarios. In addition, there were clear trade-offs observed in the ES pairs related to the water yield, while other ES pairs showed synergies. The proportions of counties that will experience changes in trade-off intensity, synergy intensity and the direction of trade-offs/synergies are expected to be 1-31%, 1-47% and 1-37%, respectively, from 2010 to 2035 under different scenarios. The study can provide valuable insights for ecological managers in HRSR in developing land use management strategies that optimize the mutual benefits of various ESs according to local conditions.

探索中国南方丘陵红壤地区生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同作用对未来土地利用变化的响应。
在生态脆弱的丘陵红壤地区(HRSR),有关未来土地利用变化可能对生态系统服务(ES)之间的权衡和协同作用造成的潜在破坏的研究仍然缺乏。我们采用多源观测数据,预测了江西省--中国典型的红壤丘陵区--2035 年在自然发展(ND)、经济发展(ED)和生态保护(EP)三种特定情景下的土地利用模式。通过整合 InVEST 模型、相关性分析和地理加权回归方法,我们评估了生境质量、土壤保持、水产量和土壤保持,以及相关的生态系统服务之间的权衡/协同作用。结果表明,在 ND 情景下,建筑用地将继续增加,并占用大量耕地和林地,导致上述四项生态系统减少 0.79%-1.96%。在 ED 情景下,耕地和建筑用地将分别增加 2.95% 和 12.00%,其中大部分将由林地转化而来,这将使 ES 减少 1.07-1.99%。在 EP 情景下,建筑用地的扩张速度将放缓,林地将增加 1.55%,与 ED 和 ND 情景相比,ES 将增加 0.02-1.58%。此外,在与产水量相关的 ES 对中观察到明显的权衡,而其他 ES 对则显示出协同作用。预计从 2010 年到 2035 年,在不同情景下,权衡强度、协同强度和权衡/协同方向发生变化的县的比例分别为 1-31%、1-47% 和 1-37%。该研究可为人力资源战略研究中的生态管理者提供宝贵的见解,帮助他们因地制宜地制定土地利用管理策略,优化各种生态系统服务的互利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信