Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Death and Hospitalization in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lindsey Rosman, Rachel Lampert, Kaicheng Wang, Anil K. Gehi, James Dziura, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, Cynthia Brandt, Samuel F. Sears, Matthew Burg
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Death and Hospitalization in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators","authors":"Lindsey Rosman, Rachel Lampert, Kaicheng Wang, Anil K. Gehi, James Dziura, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, Cynthia Brandt, Samuel F. Sears, Matthew Burg","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Predicting the clinical trajectory of individual patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is essential to inform clinical care. Machine learning approaches can potentially overcome the limitations of conventional statistical methods and provide more accurate, personalized risk estimates.<h3>Objectives</h3>We sought to develop and externally validate a novel machine learning algorithm for predicting all-cause mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in ICD patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using variables that are readily available to treating clinicians. We also sought to identify key factors that separate patients along a continuum of risk.<h3>Methods</h3>Random forest for survival, longitudinal, and multivariate (RF-SLAM) data analysis was applied to predict 3-month and 1-year risks for all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of death/HF hospitalization during the first 5 years of device implant. Models were trained using a nationwide cohort from the Veterans Health Administration. Three models were sequentially tested, and external validation was performed in a separate nonveteran clinical registry.<h3>Results</h3>The training and validation cohorts included 12,043 patients (age 67.5 ± 9.4 years) and 1,394 patients (age 66.3 ± 11.9 years), respectively. Median follow-up was 3.3 years for the training cohort and 3.6 years for validation cohort. The most accurate models for both outcomes included baseline demographics entered at the time of ICD implant (age, sex, CRT therapy) and time-varying ICD data with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting death at 3 months (0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 1 year (0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.82); death/HF hospitalization at 3 months (0.81; 95% CI: 0.79-0.83) and 1 year (0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.72). Models demonstrated high discrimination and good calibration in the validation cohort. Additionally, time-varying physiologic data from ICDs, especially daily physical activity, had substantial importance in predicting outcomes.<h3>Conclusions</h3>The RF-SLAM algorithm accurately predicted all-cause mortality and death/HF hospitalization at 3 months and 1 year during the first 5 years of device implant, demonstrating good internal and external validity. Prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to evaluate model performance in other populations and settings and to determine its impact on patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Predicting the clinical trajectory of individual patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is essential to inform clinical care. Machine learning approaches can potentially overcome the limitations of conventional statistical methods and provide more accurate, personalized risk estimates.

Objectives

We sought to develop and externally validate a novel machine learning algorithm for predicting all-cause mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in ICD patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using variables that are readily available to treating clinicians. We also sought to identify key factors that separate patients along a continuum of risk.

Methods

Random forest for survival, longitudinal, and multivariate (RF-SLAM) data analysis was applied to predict 3-month and 1-year risks for all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of death/HF hospitalization during the first 5 years of device implant. Models were trained using a nationwide cohort from the Veterans Health Administration. Three models were sequentially tested, and external validation was performed in a separate nonveteran clinical registry.

Results

The training and validation cohorts included 12,043 patients (age 67.5 ± 9.4 years) and 1,394 patients (age 66.3 ± 11.9 years), respectively. Median follow-up was 3.3 years for the training cohort and 3.6 years for validation cohort. The most accurate models for both outcomes included baseline demographics entered at the time of ICD implant (age, sex, CRT therapy) and time-varying ICD data with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting death at 3 months (0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 1 year (0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.82); death/HF hospitalization at 3 months (0.81; 95% CI: 0.79-0.83) and 1 year (0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.72). Models demonstrated high discrimination and good calibration in the validation cohort. Additionally, time-varying physiologic data from ICDs, especially daily physical activity, had substantial importance in predicting outcomes.

Conclusions

The RF-SLAM algorithm accurately predicted all-cause mortality and death/HF hospitalization at 3 months and 1 year during the first 5 years of device implant, demonstrating good internal and external validity. Prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to evaluate model performance in other populations and settings and to determine its impact on patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的植入式心律转复除颤器患者死亡和住院预测
背景预测植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者的临床轨迹对临床治疗至关重要。我们试图开发一种新型机器学习算法,并对其进行外部验证,该算法可利用临床治疗医师可随时获得的变量预测接受或未接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的 ICD 患者的全因死亡率和/或心衰(HF)住院情况。方法采用随机生存森林、纵向和多变量(RF-SLAM)数据分析预测设备植入后前 5 年内 3 个月和 1 年的全因死亡率风险以及死亡/HF 住院的复合结果。使用退伍军人健康管理局的全国性队列对模型进行了训练。结果训练队列和验证队列分别包括 12,043 名患者(年龄为 67.5 ± 9.4 岁)和 1,394 名患者(年龄为 66.3 ± 11.9 岁)。训练队列的中位随访时间为 3.3 年,验证队列的中位随访时间为 3.6 年。两种结果的最准确模型都包括植入 ICD 时输入的基线人口统计学数据(年龄、性别、CRT 治疗)和随时间变化的 ICD 数据,预测 3 个月后死亡的接收者工作特征曲线下面积(0.91;95% CI:0.87-0.94)和 1 年(0.80;95% CI:0.78-0.82);3 个月和 1 年(0.71;95% CI:0.70-0.72)的死亡/HF 住院。模型在验证队列中表现出较高的区分度和良好的校准性。结论 RF-SLAM 算法能准确预测设备植入后前 5 年内 3 个月和 1 年的全因死亡率和死亡/心房颤动住院率,显示出良好的内部和外部有效性。需要进行前瞻性研究和随机试验,以评估模型在其他人群和环境中的表现,并确定其对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信