The applicability of prompt-gamma activation analysis to obsidian provenance studies—The case of a strange find: a blade from Csongrád (South-East Hungary)

IF 2.5 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zsolt Kasztovszky, András Markó, Szende Sándor, T. Katalin Biró
{"title":"The applicability of prompt-gamma activation analysis to obsidian provenance studies—The case of a strange find: a blade from Csongrád (South-East Hungary)","authors":"Zsolt Kasztovszky,&nbsp;András Markó,&nbsp;Szende Sándor,&nbsp;T. Katalin Biró","doi":"10.1007/s00339-024-08028-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last twenty years, prompt-gamma activation analysis (PGAA) turned out to be successful in provenance research of obsidians, i.e. in the identification of possible raw material sources of various archaeological objects. Since the early 2000s, a significant database has been built at the Budapest Neutron Centre, which includes compositional data of about 500 geological and archaeological obsidian items, representing the major European and Mediterranean sources. Besides the straightforward cases of provenance studies, however, there are still a few difficult questions to answer. During the excavations of a unique grave at Csongrád (SE Hungary), a long transparent obsidian blade was found together with other objects. The grave was dated to 4370–4239 (1σ, 68.2%) cal. BC, belonging to the first wave of the ‘Pit Grave’ culture and having strong eastern contacts. Following the first energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurement in 1983, the blade was compared to the Carpathian 1 (Slovakian) type raw material. In 2019, PGAA and portable X-Ray Fluorescence analysis have been done on the same piece. Based on the first results, the Csongrád specimen, unlike other archaeological samples studied so far, was not possible to unambiguously associate with any of the known obsidian types. In order to clarify the provenance of the Csongrád blade, we have extended our database with more geological reference data from both sides of the Caucasus (i.e. from Armenia and Georgia), which are the closest outcrops to the main distribution region of the Pit Grave Culture in the NE part of the Black Sea. Until now, still no reassuring explanation is available concerning the provenance of the object with unusual composition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":473,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physics A","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00339-024-08028-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physics A","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00339-024-08028-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last twenty years, prompt-gamma activation analysis (PGAA) turned out to be successful in provenance research of obsidians, i.e. in the identification of possible raw material sources of various archaeological objects. Since the early 2000s, a significant database has been built at the Budapest Neutron Centre, which includes compositional data of about 500 geological and archaeological obsidian items, representing the major European and Mediterranean sources. Besides the straightforward cases of provenance studies, however, there are still a few difficult questions to answer. During the excavations of a unique grave at Csongrád (SE Hungary), a long transparent obsidian blade was found together with other objects. The grave was dated to 4370–4239 (1σ, 68.2%) cal. BC, belonging to the first wave of the ‘Pit Grave’ culture and having strong eastern contacts. Following the first energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurement in 1983, the blade was compared to the Carpathian 1 (Slovakian) type raw material. In 2019, PGAA and portable X-Ray Fluorescence analysis have been done on the same piece. Based on the first results, the Csongrád specimen, unlike other archaeological samples studied so far, was not possible to unambiguously associate with any of the known obsidian types. In order to clarify the provenance of the Csongrád blade, we have extended our database with more geological reference data from both sides of the Caucasus (i.e. from Armenia and Georgia), which are the closest outcrops to the main distribution region of the Pit Grave Culture in the NE part of the Black Sea. Until now, still no reassuring explanation is available concerning the provenance of the object with unusual composition.

瞬时伽马活化分析在黑曜石来源研究中的适用性--一个奇特发现的案例:来自匈牙利东南部克松格拉德的刀片
在过去的二十年里,瞬时伽马活化分析(PGAA)在黑曜石的来源研究,即确定各种考古物品可能的原材料来源方面取得了成功。自 2000 年代初以来,布达佩斯中子中心建立了一个重要的数据库,其中包括代表欧洲和地中海主要来源的约 500 件地质和考古黑曜石的成分数据。不过,除了简单明了的来源研究之外,还有一些棘手的问题有待解答。在对 Csongrád(匈牙利东南部)的一个独特坟墓进行发掘时,发现了一把透明的黑曜石长刀和其他物品。该墓葬的年代为公元前 4370-4239 (1σ, 68.2%) 年,属于第一波考古发现。该墓葬的年代为公元前 4370-4239 年(1σ,68.2%),属于 "坑墓 "文化的第一波,与东部地区有密切联系。在 1983 年首次进行能量色散 X 射线光谱(EDS)测量之后,该石器与喀尔巴阡山脉 1 号(斯洛伐克)石器原料进行了比较。2019 年,对同一块材料进行了 PGAA 和便携式 X 射线荧光分析。根据初步结果,与迄今为止研究的其他考古样本不同,克松拉德样本无法明确地与任何已知的黑曜石类型相联系。为了澄清 Csongrád 刀片的来源,我们在数据库中添加了更多来自高加索两侧(即亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚)的地质参考数据,这两个地区是最接近黑海东北部坑墓文化主要分布区的地层。迄今为止,对于这种成分异常的物品的来源,仍然没有令人信服的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Physics A
Applied Physics A 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
964
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Applied Physics A publishes experimental and theoretical investigations in applied physics as regular articles, rapid communications, and invited papers. The distinguished 30-member Board of Editors reflects the interdisciplinary approach of the journal and ensures the highest quality of peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信