Progressive degradation of acetylated wood by the brown rot fungi Coniophora puteana and Rhodonia placenta

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Tiina Belt, Muhammad Awais
{"title":"Progressive degradation of acetylated wood by the brown rot fungi Coniophora puteana and Rhodonia placenta","authors":"Tiina Belt,&nbsp;Muhammad Awais","doi":"10.1007/s00226-024-01620-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acetylation is a wood modification method that reduces the hygroscopicity of wood and increases its resistance to degradation by wood decaying fungi. Even though acetylated wood can have very high decay resistance, the wood material can be degraded and sometimes deacetylated by fungi. This study investigated the degradation and deacetylation of acetylated wood by <i>Coniophora puteana</i> and <i>Rhodonia placenta</i> to better understand the relationship between degradation and deacetylation in two different brown rot fungi. Wood samples were exposed to the fungi in a stacked-sample decay test, followed by acetyl content measurements and FTIR spectroscopy to investigate chemical changes in the samples. The results showed that both fungi could degrade acetylated wood to high mass loss despite a strong reduction in moisture content, but only <i>R. placenta</i> was found to cause preferential deacetylation. The deacetylation was slight and only observed in the early stages of decay in highly acetylated wood. Otherwise, acetyl groups were lost from the samples at the rate of mass loss. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the loss of acetyl groups and revealed some chemical differences between unacetylated and acetylated wood. The spectral data indicated the loss of acetyl groups from lignin, which suggests that the loss of acetyl groups is not only due to the degradation of acetylated carbohydrates. The degradation of acetylated wood required further investigation, but it is clear that extensive deacetylation is not a requirement for brown rot degradation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":810,"journal":{"name":"Wood Science and Technology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00226-024-01620-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-024-01620-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acetylation is a wood modification method that reduces the hygroscopicity of wood and increases its resistance to degradation by wood decaying fungi. Even though acetylated wood can have very high decay resistance, the wood material can be degraded and sometimes deacetylated by fungi. This study investigated the degradation and deacetylation of acetylated wood by Coniophora puteana and Rhodonia placenta to better understand the relationship between degradation and deacetylation in two different brown rot fungi. Wood samples were exposed to the fungi in a stacked-sample decay test, followed by acetyl content measurements and FTIR spectroscopy to investigate chemical changes in the samples. The results showed that both fungi could degrade acetylated wood to high mass loss despite a strong reduction in moisture content, but only R. placenta was found to cause preferential deacetylation. The deacetylation was slight and only observed in the early stages of decay in highly acetylated wood. Otherwise, acetyl groups were lost from the samples at the rate of mass loss. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the loss of acetyl groups and revealed some chemical differences between unacetylated and acetylated wood. The spectral data indicated the loss of acetyl groups from lignin, which suggests that the loss of acetyl groups is not only due to the degradation of acetylated carbohydrates. The degradation of acetylated wood required further investigation, but it is clear that extensive deacetylation is not a requirement for brown rot degradation.

褐腐真菌 Coniophora puteana 和 Rhodonia placenta 对乙酰化木材的逐步降解作用
乙酰化是一种木材改性方法,可降低木材的吸湿性,提高其抗木材腐朽真菌降解的能力。尽管乙酰化木材具有很强的抗腐性,但这种木材材料也会被真菌降解,有时还会被脱乙酰化。本研究调查了褐腐真菌 Coniophora puteana 和 Rhodonia placenta 对乙酰化木材的降解和脱乙酰化作用,以更好地了解两种不同褐腐真菌降解和脱乙酰化之间的关系。在堆叠样品腐朽试验中,木材样品暴露于真菌,然后测量乙酰含量,并用傅立叶变换红外光谱法研究样品中的化学变化。结果表明,尽管木材含水率大幅降低,但两种真菌都能降解乙酰化木材,造成大量质量损失,但只有胎盘霉菌能优先导致脱乙酰化。这种脱乙酰作用很轻微,而且只有在高乙酰化木材腐烂的早期阶段才能观察到。否则,乙酰基就会以质量损失的速度从样品中消失。傅立叶变换红外光谱证实了乙酰基的损失,并揭示了未乙酰化木材和乙酰化木材之间的一些化学差异。光谱数据表明乙酰基从木质素中流失,这表明乙酰基的流失不仅仅是由于乙酰化碳水化合物的降解。乙酰化木材的降解需要进一步研究,但很明显,广泛的脱乙酰化并不是褐腐病降解的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood Science and Technology
Wood Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wood Science and Technology publishes original scientific research results and review papers covering the entire field of wood material science, wood components and wood based products. Subjects are wood biology and wood quality, wood physics and physical technologies, wood chemistry and chemical technologies. Latest advances in areas such as cell wall and wood formation; structural and chemical composition of wood and wood composites and their property relations; physical, mechanical and chemical characterization and relevant methodological developments, and microbiological degradation of wood and wood based products are reported. Topics related to wood technology include machining, gluing, and finishing, composite technology, wood modification, wood mechanics, creep and rheology, and the conversion of wood into pulp and biorefinery products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信