Resource Flow Network Structure Drives Metaecosystem Function.

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1086/732812
Tianna Peller, Isabelle Gounand, Florian Altermatt
{"title":"Resource Flow Network Structure Drives Metaecosystem Function.","authors":"Tianna Peller, Isabelle Gounand, Florian Altermatt","doi":"10.1086/732812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractNonliving resources frequently flow across ecosystem boundaries, which can yield networks of spatially coupled ecosystems. Yet the significance of resource flows for ecosystem function has predominantly been understood by studying two or a few coupled ecosystems, overlooking the broader resource flow network and its spatial structure. Here, we investigate how the spatial structure of larger resource flow networks influences ecosystem function at metaecosystem scales by analyzing metaecosystem models with homogeneously versus heterogeneously distributed resource flow networks but otherwise identical characteristics. We show that metaecosystem function can differ strongly between metaecosystems with contrasting resource flow networks. Differences in function generally arise through the scaling up of nonlinear local processes interacting with spatial variation in local dynamics, the latter of which is influenced by network structure. However, we find that neither network structure guarantees the greatest metaecosystem function. Rather, biotic (organism traits) and abiotic (resource flow rates) properties interact with network structure to determine which yields greater metaecosystem function. Our findings suggest that the spatial structure of resource flow networks coupling ecosystems can be a driver of ecosystem function at landscape scales. Furthermore, our study demonstrates how modifications to the structural, biotic, or abiotic properties of metaecosystem networks can have nontrivial large-scale effects on ecosystem function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"204 6","pages":"546-560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/732812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractNonliving resources frequently flow across ecosystem boundaries, which can yield networks of spatially coupled ecosystems. Yet the significance of resource flows for ecosystem function has predominantly been understood by studying two or a few coupled ecosystems, overlooking the broader resource flow network and its spatial structure. Here, we investigate how the spatial structure of larger resource flow networks influences ecosystem function at metaecosystem scales by analyzing metaecosystem models with homogeneously versus heterogeneously distributed resource flow networks but otherwise identical characteristics. We show that metaecosystem function can differ strongly between metaecosystems with contrasting resource flow networks. Differences in function generally arise through the scaling up of nonlinear local processes interacting with spatial variation in local dynamics, the latter of which is influenced by network structure. However, we find that neither network structure guarantees the greatest metaecosystem function. Rather, biotic (organism traits) and abiotic (resource flow rates) properties interact with network structure to determine which yields greater metaecosystem function. Our findings suggest that the spatial structure of resource flow networks coupling ecosystems can be a driver of ecosystem function at landscape scales. Furthermore, our study demonstrates how modifications to the structural, biotic, or abiotic properties of metaecosystem networks can have nontrivial large-scale effects on ecosystem function.

资源流动网络结构驱动元生态系统功能
摘要 非生物资源经常跨越生态系统边界流动,从而形成空间耦合生态系统网络。然而,人们主要通过研究两个或几个耦合生态系统来了解资源流动对生态系统功能的重要性,而忽视了更广泛的资源流动网络及其空间结构。在这里,我们通过分析资源流网络同质分布与异质分布但其他特征相同的元生态系统模型,研究了更大资源流网络的空间结构如何影响元生态系统尺度的生态系统功能。我们的研究表明,在资源流动网络截然不同的元生态系统之间,元生态系统的功能会有很大差异。功能差异一般是由于非线性局部过程的放大与局部动态的空间变化相互作用而产生的,后者受到网络结构的影响。然而,我们发现这两种网络结构都不能保证元生态系统功能的最大化。相反,生物(生物特征)和非生物(资源流动率)特性与网络结构相互作用,决定了哪种网络结构能产生更大的元生态系统功能。我们的研究结果表明,耦合生态系统的资源流动网络的空间结构可以成为景观尺度上生态系统功能的驱动力。此外,我们的研究还证明了元生态系统网络的结构、生物或非生物特性的改变如何对生态系统功能产生非同小可的大规模影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信