Making Community-Based Palliative Care Eligibility Determinations: Palliative Care Team Member Perspectives on Access to Information and Algorithm Use.

Kira G Sheldon, Kathryn H Bowles, Carolyn Sage, June Stanley, Elizabeth A Luth
{"title":"Making Community-Based Palliative Care Eligibility Determinations: Palliative Care Team Member Perspectives on Access to Information and Algorithm Use.","authors":"Kira G Sheldon, Kathryn H Bowles, Carolyn Sage, June Stanley, Elizabeth A Luth","doi":"10.1177/10499091241302044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seriously ill older adults have high risk of mortality, symptom burden, and compromised functional status, and may benefit from community-based palliative care (\"palliative care\"). However, identifying potentially eligible individuals is challenging.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify how a palliative care team makes eligibility determinations, including the use of a mortality risk algorithm.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with palliative care providers to understand how health information is used to assess Medicare Advantage plan patients' eligibility for palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed to identify categories related to how participants used health information in making eligibility determinations.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>All outreach and care management team members and nurse practitioners (n = 7) working for a palliative care program at a not-for-profit health care agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The palliative care team used information on symptoms, diagnoses, and acute care utilization when making eligibility determinations. The algorithm generated lists of potentially eligible patients but was deemed not useful because it provided limited information about current health status and was not well integrated into existing health record systems. Participants would like information to be current, detailed, and presented in one location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care team members used a variety of indicators of unmet care needs to make eligibility determinations. A mortality risk algorithm to identify potentially eligible patients was insufficiently detailed to be useful in final eligibility determinations. These findings provide insights into how health data can be presented to better integrate health information from mortality risk algorithms into existing workflows to support palliative care eligibility decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241302044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241302044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seriously ill older adults have high risk of mortality, symptom burden, and compromised functional status, and may benefit from community-based palliative care ("palliative care"). However, identifying potentially eligible individuals is challenging.

Objectives: Identify how a palliative care team makes eligibility determinations, including the use of a mortality risk algorithm.

Design: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with palliative care providers to understand how health information is used to assess Medicare Advantage plan patients' eligibility for palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed to identify categories related to how participants used health information in making eligibility determinations.

Setting/participants: All outreach and care management team members and nurse practitioners (n = 7) working for a palliative care program at a not-for-profit health care agency.

Results: The palliative care team used information on symptoms, diagnoses, and acute care utilization when making eligibility determinations. The algorithm generated lists of potentially eligible patients but was deemed not useful because it provided limited information about current health status and was not well integrated into existing health record systems. Participants would like information to be current, detailed, and presented in one location.

Conclusions: Palliative care team members used a variety of indicators of unmet care needs to make eligibility determinations. A mortality risk algorithm to identify potentially eligible patients was insufficiently detailed to be useful in final eligibility determinations. These findings provide insights into how health data can be presented to better integrate health information from mortality risk algorithms into existing workflows to support palliative care eligibility decision making.

基于社区的姑息关怀资格确定:姑息关怀团队成员对信息获取和算法使用的看法。
背景:身患重病的老年人死亡率高、症状多、功能受损,可能会从社区姑息关怀("姑息关怀")中受益。然而,识别可能符合条件的个人是一项挑战:目标:确定姑息关怀团队如何进行资格认定,包括使用死亡风险算法:设计:与姑息关怀医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化焦点小组讨论,以了解如何使用健康信息来评估医疗保险优势计划患者接受姑息关怀的资格。对记录誊本进行分析,以确定参与者在确定资格时如何使用健康信息的相关类别:在一家非营利性医疗机构的姑息关怀项目中工作的所有外展和关怀管理团队成员及执业护士(n = 7):结果:姑息关怀团队在确定患者资格时使用了症状、诊断和急症护理使用情况等信息。该算法生成了可能符合条件的患者名单,但由于其提供的当前健康状况信息有限,且不能很好地整合到现有的健康记录系统中,因此被认为并无用处。参与者希望信息是最新的、详细的,并能在一个地方显示:姑息关怀团队成员使用各种未满足关怀需求的指标来确定是否符合资格。用于确定潜在合格患者的死亡率风险算法不够详细,因此在最终确定合格患者时没有用武之地。这些发现为如何展示健康数据提供了启示,以便更好地将死亡率风险算法中的健康信息整合到现有的工作流程中,支持姑息关怀资格决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信