Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years.

Pietro Felice, Lorenzo Bonifazi, Roberto Pistilli, Lorenzo Trevisiol, Gerardo Pellegrino, Pier Francesco Nocini, Carlo Barausse, Subhi Tayeb, Massimo Bersani, Antonio D'Agostino
{"title":"Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years.","authors":"Pietro Felice, Lorenzo Bonifazi, Roberto Pistilli, Lorenzo Trevisiol, Gerardo Pellegrino, Pier Francesco Nocini, Carlo Barausse, Subhi Tayeb, Massimo Bersani, Antonio D'Agostino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Zygomatic implants are considered one of the last options for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy when standard implants cannot be placed. They offer several advantages but can also present complications. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of zygomatic implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted, and the inclusion criteria consisted of patients previously treated with zygomatic implants who had Class V or VI maxillary bone atrophy according to Cawood and Howell, and with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years after prosthetic loading. Outcome measures included implant and prosthesis survival rate, biological and biomechanical complications, and Lund-Mackay staging score before and after implant placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 78 patients who received a total of 274 zygomatic implants. The mean follow-up period was 90.4 ± 26.0 months. Seventeen implant failures occurred, resulting in a survival rate of 93.8%, with a statistically significant negative correlation with smoking habits (P = 0.049), anchorage to the two zygomatic bone cortices (bicorticality) (P 0.001) and soft tissue complications (P 0.001). The prosthetic success rate was 92.3%. A statistically significant increase in maxillary sinus radiopacity was recorded when comparing the situation before and after surgery (P 0.001), and the intrasinus pathway had a statistically significant influence on that increase (P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zygomatic implants utilised for rehabilitating patients with severe maxillary atrophy have shown favourable outcomes. Nonetheless, owing to potential complications, strict case selection is necessary, combined with regular recall visits and proper oral hygiene maintenance. Furthermore, this type of surgery necessitates specialised training and expertise on the part of the practitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"17 4","pages":"401-408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Zygomatic implants are considered one of the last options for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy when standard implants cannot be placed. They offer several advantages but can also present complications. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of zygomatic implant placement.

Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted, and the inclusion criteria consisted of patients previously treated with zygomatic implants who had Class V or VI maxillary bone atrophy according to Cawood and Howell, and with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years after prosthetic loading. Outcome measures included implant and prosthesis survival rate, biological and biomechanical complications, and Lund-Mackay staging score before and after implant placement.

Results: The study included 78 patients who received a total of 274 zygomatic implants. The mean follow-up period was 90.4 ± 26.0 months. Seventeen implant failures occurred, resulting in a survival rate of 93.8%, with a statistically significant negative correlation with smoking habits (P = 0.049), anchorage to the two zygomatic bone cortices (bicorticality) (P 0.001) and soft tissue complications (P 0.001). The prosthetic success rate was 92.3%. A statistically significant increase in maxillary sinus radiopacity was recorded when comparing the situation before and after surgery (P 0.001), and the intrasinus pathway had a statistically significant influence on that increase (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Zygomatic implants utilised for rehabilitating patients with severe maxillary atrophy have shown favourable outcomes. Nonetheless, owing to potential complications, strict case selection is necessary, combined with regular recall visits and proper oral hygiene maintenance. Furthermore, this type of surgery necessitates specialised training and expertise on the part of the practitioner.

颧骨种植体在严重上颌骨萎缩康复中的应用:一项对 274 个颧骨植入体进行的回顾性研究,平均随访时间为 7.5 年。
目的:在无法植入标准种植体的情况下,颧骨种植体被认为是严重上颌骨萎缩患者最后的康复选择之一。颧骨种植体具有多种优点,但也可能出现并发症。本研究旨在调查颧骨种植体植入的长期临床和影像学结果:研究人员对病历进行了回顾性分析,纳入标准包括曾接受过颧骨种植治疗的患者,根据卡伍德(Cawood)和豪威尔(Howell)的标准,这些患者的上颌骨萎缩程度为V级或VI级,且修复体植入后的随访时间至少为2年。结果包括种植体和修复体的存活率、生物学和生物力学并发症以及种植体植入前后的 Lund-Mackay 分期评分:研究共纳入 78 名患者,他们共接受了 274 个颧骨种植体。平均随访时间为 90.4 ± 26.0 个月。共有 17 例种植失败,存活率为 93.8%,与吸烟习惯(P = 0.049)、与两个颧骨皮质的固定(双皮质性)(P 0.001)和软组织并发症(P 0.001)呈显著负相关。修复成功率为 92.3%。对比手术前后的情况,上颌窦透光度有明显增加(P 0.001),窦内路径对这一增加有明显影响(P = 0.003):结论:颧骨种植体用于严重上颌骨萎缩患者的康复效果良好。然而,由于潜在的并发症,必须严格选择病例,并定期复诊和保持适当的口腔卫生。此外,这类手术还需要医生接受专门培训并掌握专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信