The adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics in the non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bill Okuma-Oliveira, Isabella Neme Ribeiro Dos Reis, Maria Luisa Silveira Souto, Mariana Minatel Braga, Rubens Spin-Neto, Franz Josef Strauss, Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Luciana Saraiva
{"title":"The adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics in the non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bill Okuma-Oliveira, Isabella Neme Ribeiro Dos Reis, Maria Luisa Silveira Souto, Mariana Minatel Braga, Rubens Spin-Neto, Franz Josef Strauss, Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Luciana Saraiva","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the additional benefits of the adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics in the non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search following the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study design framework was conducted across the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Web of Science databases. The primary outcome was probing depth reduction, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, radiographic bone level changes, suppuration and clinical success. Data on outcome variables were pooled through random effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight articles (seven studies) were included. For non-surgical interventions, systemic antibiotics reduced probing depth significantly after 1 year (n = 4; mean difference 1.33, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.82; P 0.01), and also led to significant benefits in probing depth reduction at 3 and 6 months, clinical attachment level gain at 1 year (n = 3; mean difference 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.95; P 0.01) and suppuration reduction at 3 months; however, no significant differences were found in bleeding on probing at 3 and 6 months, or clinical success at 1 year. For surgical treatment, antibiotics reduced probing depth significantly after 6 months, but no significant differences were noted after 1 year. Systemic antibiotics resulted in a significant increase in radiographic bone level after 1 year (n = 2; mean difference 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 1.61; P 0.01) and a higher chance of clinical success (n = 2; odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 4.50; P = 0.009). In the combined analysis of non-surgical and surgical treatments for probing depth reduction at 1 year, systemic antibiotics showed a significant advantage (n = 5; mean difference 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.40; P 0.01). Benefits extended to clinical attachment level gain, bone gain and increased likelihood of clinical success at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with adjunctive systemic antibiotics led to significant benefits in probing depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain and suppuration reduction at 1 year. Surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics showed significant benefits in terms of bone gain and clinical success at 1 year. Nevertheless, the variability in antibiotic protocols should be considered. The adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics should be evaluated with caution, as the benefits may not outweigh the risks of antibiotic resistance in less severe cases of peri-implantitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"17 4","pages":"359-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the additional benefits of the adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics in the non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

Materials and methods: A systematic search following the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study design framework was conducted across the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Web of Science databases. The primary outcome was probing depth reduction, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, radiographic bone level changes, suppuration and clinical success. Data on outcome variables were pooled through random effects meta-analyses.

Results: Eight articles (seven studies) were included. For non-surgical interventions, systemic antibiotics reduced probing depth significantly after 1 year (n = 4; mean difference 1.33, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.82; P 0.01), and also led to significant benefits in probing depth reduction at 3 and 6 months, clinical attachment level gain at 1 year (n = 3; mean difference 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.95; P 0.01) and suppuration reduction at 3 months; however, no significant differences were found in bleeding on probing at 3 and 6 months, or clinical success at 1 year. For surgical treatment, antibiotics reduced probing depth significantly after 6 months, but no significant differences were noted after 1 year. Systemic antibiotics resulted in a significant increase in radiographic bone level after 1 year (n = 2; mean difference 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 1.61; P 0.01) and a higher chance of clinical success (n = 2; odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 4.50; P = 0.009). In the combined analysis of non-surgical and surgical treatments for probing depth reduction at 1 year, systemic antibiotics showed a significant advantage (n = 5; mean difference 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.40; P 0.01). Benefits extended to clinical attachment level gain, bone gain and increased likelihood of clinical success at 1 year.

Conclusion: Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with adjunctive systemic antibiotics led to significant benefits in probing depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain and suppuration reduction at 1 year. Surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics showed significant benefits in terms of bone gain and clinical success at 1 year. Nevertheless, the variability in antibiotic protocols should be considered. The adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics should be evaluated with caution, as the benefits may not outweigh the risks of antibiotic resistance in less severe cases of peri-implantitis.

在种植体周围炎的非手术和手术治疗中辅助使用全身性抗生素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:评估在种植体周围炎的非手术和手术治疗中辅助使用全身性抗生素的额外益处:在 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库中按照人群、干预、比较、结果和研究设计框架进行了系统检索。主要结果是探诊深度减少,次要结果是探诊出血、临床附着水平、放射学骨水平变化、化脓和临床成功。通过随机效应荟萃分析对结果变量数据进行汇总:结果:共纳入 8 篇文章(7 项研究)。在非手术干预方面,系统性抗生素可在 1 年后显著降低探诊深度(n = 4;平均差 1.33,95% 置信区间 0.84 至 1.82;P 0.01),并可在 3 个月和 6 个月后显著降低探诊深度,在 1 年后显著提高临床附着水平(n = 3;平均差 1.31,95% 置信区间为 0.68 至 1.95;P 0.01),3 个月时化脓减少;但是,3 个月和 6 个月时探诊出血量以及 1 年时临床成功率没有发现显著差异。就手术治疗而言,抗生素在 6 个月后可显著降低探查深度,但在 1 年后则无明显差异。全身使用抗生素可在 1 年后显著提高影像学骨水平(n = 2;平均差 0.96,95% 置信区间 0.31 至 1.61;P 0.01),并提高临床成功的几率(n = 2;几率比 2.16,95% 置信区间 1.04 至 4.50;P = 0.009)。在对非手术治疗和手术治疗一年后探诊深度降低的综合分析中,全身性抗生素显示出显著优势(n = 5;平均差异为 0.98,95% 置信区间为 0.56 至 1.40;P 0.01)。1年后,临床附着水平提高、骨质增生和临床成功的可能性也增加了:结论:使用全身性辅助抗生素对种植体周围炎进行非手术治疗,可在探查深度减少、临床附着水平提高和化脓减少方面带来显著疗效。辅助全身性抗生素的手术治疗在骨量增加和一年后的临床成功率方面有明显的优势。尽管如此,抗生素方案的多变性仍应加以考虑。应谨慎评估系统性抗生素的辅助使用,因为在不太严重的种植体周围炎病例中,其益处可能不会超过抗生素耐药性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信