Using the Design Thinking Approach for a University Health Promotion Program: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia M Alber, David Askay, Christine Nelson, James Ramirez-Crippen
{"title":"Using the Design Thinking Approach for a University Health Promotion Program: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Julia M Alber, David Askay, Christine Nelson, James Ramirez-Crippen","doi":"10.1177/15248399241294233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>University wellness programs often employ health campaigns to promote awareness and engagement in health behaviors. However, with limited resources, it is challenging to develop and test health campaign materials in a timely manner. The Design Thinking Approach (DTA) provides a promising strategy for developing materials in a quicker, less expensive way compared to traditional methods. This pilot study examined the feasibility and short-term impact of implementing the DTA to develop a self-care campaign at a university to reach students on campus. University peer health educators and staff completed a 5-session DTA workshop to learn how to apply the DTA to develop and test a self-care campaign. Feasibility of the approach was conducted by having workshop participants rate the acceptability and practicality of the process. To examine the short-term impact, the self-care campaign was compared to an existing mental health campaign. Results from the feasibility analysis indicated that the participants responded well to the approach and found it to be overall beneficial. Results also revealed that the self-care campaign had a greater number of event attendees compared to the existing mental health campaign. However, the reach on social media was similar, but slightly higher, for the existing mental health campaign. No significant difference in perceived effectiveness score was found. Results provide evidence for the potential for the DTA to be a feasible and efficient tool for testing health campaign ideas. However, more extensive testing is needed to understand its impact long-term and which feedback methods (e.g., interviews and surveys) are most useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241294233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241294233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

University wellness programs often employ health campaigns to promote awareness and engagement in health behaviors. However, with limited resources, it is challenging to develop and test health campaign materials in a timely manner. The Design Thinking Approach (DTA) provides a promising strategy for developing materials in a quicker, less expensive way compared to traditional methods. This pilot study examined the feasibility and short-term impact of implementing the DTA to develop a self-care campaign at a university to reach students on campus. University peer health educators and staff completed a 5-session DTA workshop to learn how to apply the DTA to develop and test a self-care campaign. Feasibility of the approach was conducted by having workshop participants rate the acceptability and practicality of the process. To examine the short-term impact, the self-care campaign was compared to an existing mental health campaign. Results from the feasibility analysis indicated that the participants responded well to the approach and found it to be overall beneficial. Results also revealed that the self-care campaign had a greater number of event attendees compared to the existing mental health campaign. However, the reach on social media was similar, but slightly higher, for the existing mental health campaign. No significant difference in perceived effectiveness score was found. Results provide evidence for the potential for the DTA to be a feasible and efficient tool for testing health campaign ideas. However, more extensive testing is needed to understand its impact long-term and which feedback methods (e.g., interviews and surveys) are most useful.

在大学健康促进计划中使用设计思维方法:试点研究。
大学健康计划通常采用健康宣传活动来提高人们的健康意识和参与健康行为的积极性。然而,由于资源有限,及时开发和测试健康活动材料具有挑战性。与传统方法相比,设计思维方法(Design Thinking Approach,DTA)提供了一种以更快、更低成本开发材料的可行策略。这项试点研究考察了在一所大学开展自我保健宣传活动的可行性和短期影响。大学同伴健康教育者和教职员工完成了为期五节的 DTA 工作坊,学习如何应用 DTA 来开发和测试自我保健活动。通过让研修班学员对该过程的可接受性和实用性进行评分,对该方法的可行性进行了评估。为了考察短期影响,将自我保健活动与现有的心理健康活动进行了比较。可行性分析的结果表明,参与者对该方法反应良好,并认为该方法总体上是有益的。结果还显示,与现有的心理健康活动相比,自我保健活动的参与者人数更多。然而,现有心理健康宣传活动在社交媒体上的覆盖率与自我保健活动相似,但略高于自我保健活动。在感知效果得分方面没有发现明显差异。结果证明,DTA 有可能成为测试健康活动创意的可行且高效的工具。不过,还需要进行更广泛的测试,以了解其长期影响以及哪种反馈方法(如访谈和调查)最有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信