Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Leonardo Rundo, Carmelo Militello
{"title":"Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features.","authors":"Leonardo Rundo, Carmelo Militello","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feature extraction and selection from medical data are the basis of radiomics and image biomarker discovery for various architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We herein describe the typical radiomics steps and the components of a CNN for both deep feature extraction and end-to-end approaches. We discuss the curse of dimensionality, along with dimensionality reduction techniques. Despite the outstanding performance of deep learning (DL) approaches, the use of handcrafted features instead of deep learned features needs to be considered for each specific study. Dataset size is a key factor: large-scale datasets with low sample diversity could lead to overfitting; limited sample sizes can provide unstable models. The dataset must be representative of all the \"facets\" of the clinical phenomenon/disease investigated. The access to high-performance computational resources from graphics processing units is another key factor, especially for the training phase of deep architectures. The advantages of multi-institutional federated/collaborative learning are described. When large language models are used, high stability is needed to avoid catastrophic forgetting in complex domain-specific tasks. We highlight that non-DL approaches provide model explainability superior to that provided by DL approaches. To implement explainability, the need for explainable AI arises, also through post hoc mechanisms. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This work aims to provide the key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers. KEY POINTS: The key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers are provided. The main differences between radiomics and representation learning approaches are highlighted. The advantages and disadvantages of handcrafted versus learned features are given without losing sight of the clinical purpose of artificial intelligence models.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00529-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feature extraction and selection from medical data are the basis of radiomics and image biomarker discovery for various architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We herein describe the typical radiomics steps and the components of a CNN for both deep feature extraction and end-to-end approaches. We discuss the curse of dimensionality, along with dimensionality reduction techniques. Despite the outstanding performance of deep learning (DL) approaches, the use of handcrafted features instead of deep learned features needs to be considered for each specific study. Dataset size is a key factor: large-scale datasets with low sample diversity could lead to overfitting; limited sample sizes can provide unstable models. The dataset must be representative of all the "facets" of the clinical phenomenon/disease investigated. The access to high-performance computational resources from graphics processing units is another key factor, especially for the training phase of deep architectures. The advantages of multi-institutional federated/collaborative learning are described. When large language models are used, high stability is needed to avoid catastrophic forgetting in complex domain-specific tasks. We highlight that non-DL approaches provide model explainability superior to that provided by DL approaches. To implement explainability, the need for explainable AI arises, also through post hoc mechanisms. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This work aims to provide the key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers. KEY POINTS: The key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers are provided. The main differences between radiomics and representation learning approaches are highlighted. The advantages and disadvantages of handcrafted versus learned features are given without losing sight of the clinical purpose of artificial intelligence models.

图像生物标记和可解释的人工智能:手工特征与深度学习特征。
从医疗数据中提取和选择特征是包括卷积神经网络(CNN)在内的各种架构进行放射组学和图像生物标记发现的基础。在此,我们将介绍典型的放射组学步骤以及深度特征提取和端到端方法的 CNN 组件。我们讨论了维度诅咒以及降维技术。尽管深度学习(DL)方法表现出色,但每项具体研究仍需考虑使用手工特征而非深度学习特征。数据集规模是一个关键因素:样本多样性低的大规模数据集可能会导致过度拟合;样本规模有限可能会提供不稳定的模型。数据集必须能代表所研究的临床现象/疾病的所有 "方面"。从图形处理单元获取高性能计算资源是另一个关键因素,尤其是在深度架构的训练阶段。本文介绍了多机构联合/协作学习的优势。在使用大型语言模型时,需要较高的稳定性,以避免在复杂的特定领域任务中发生灾难性遗忘。我们强调,非 DL 方法提供的模型可解释性优于 DL 方法。要实现可解释性,就需要可解释的人工智能,这也是通过事后机制实现的。相关性声明:这项工作旨在提供处理成像特征的关键概念,以提取可靠、稳健的图像生物标记。关键点:提供了处理成像特征以提取可靠、稳健的图像生物标记物的关键概念。强调放射组学和表征学习方法之间的主要区别。在不忽视人工智能模型临床用途的前提下,介绍了手工特征与学习特征的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信