Sagittal alignment to predict efficiency in pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Cheng-Yo Yen, Sheng-Min Lin, Hong Yu Chen, Shih-Wei Wang, Yu-Duan Tsai, Cien-Leong Chye, Te-Yuan Chen, Hao-Kuang Wang, Kuo-Wei Wang
{"title":"Sagittal alignment to predict efficiency in pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain.","authors":"Cheng-Yo Yen, Sheng-Min Lin, Hong Yu Chen, Shih-Wei Wang, Yu-Duan Tsai, Cien-Leong Chye, Te-Yuan Chen, Hao-Kuang Wang, Kuo-Wei Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-79181-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neck pain due to cervical facet joint pain has a prevalence of 36-60% in chronic neck pain. Pulsed radiofrequency for such pain has been verified. After proper patient selection, pulsed radiofrequency of the cervical facet joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. In the patient selection, clinical and sagittal alignment parameters are rarely discussed for the outcome. In the present study, we analyzed the factors from the clinical data and sagittal alignment parameters and investigated the associated predictors of pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain. There were 204 patients with cervical facet joint pain who received a medial branch block and pulsed radiofrequency between 2015 and 2020 after excluding patients with neurological symptoms and other confounding factors. The patients were classified into good and poor outcome groups based on the improvement of the pain score(visual analog scale). Clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Multivariable logistic model showed that the predictors were cervical lordosis including two methods (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.96 for C2-C7 Cobb angle; OR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95 for the angle measured by the Jackson method), ossification of the nuchal ligament, number of diseased facet joints, anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. With the results, we demonstrated that the outcome were related to cervical lordosis including two methods, formation of ossification of nuchal ligament, the number of diseased facet joints, post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. The corresponding optimal cutoff for discriminating a poor outcome was 7° for the C2-C7 Cobb angle and - 2° for the angle measured using the Jackson method.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"28563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79181-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neck pain due to cervical facet joint pain has a prevalence of 36-60% in chronic neck pain. Pulsed radiofrequency for such pain has been verified. After proper patient selection, pulsed radiofrequency of the cervical facet joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. In the patient selection, clinical and sagittal alignment parameters are rarely discussed for the outcome. In the present study, we analyzed the factors from the clinical data and sagittal alignment parameters and investigated the associated predictors of pulsed radiofrequency for cervical facet joint pain. There were 204 patients with cervical facet joint pain who received a medial branch block and pulsed radiofrequency between 2015 and 2020 after excluding patients with neurological symptoms and other confounding factors. The patients were classified into good and poor outcome groups based on the improvement of the pain score(visual analog scale). Clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Multivariable logistic model showed that the predictors were cervical lordosis including two methods (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.96 for C2-C7 Cobb angle; OR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95 for the angle measured by the Jackson method), ossification of the nuchal ligament, number of diseased facet joints, anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. With the results, we demonstrated that the outcome were related to cervical lordosis including two methods, formation of ossification of nuchal ligament, the number of diseased facet joints, post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and adjacent facet joint post anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. The corresponding optimal cutoff for discriminating a poor outcome was 7° for the C2-C7 Cobb angle and - 2° for the angle measured using the Jackson method.

预测脉冲射频治疗颈椎面关节疼痛效率的矢状对位。
在慢性颈部疼痛中,颈椎面关节疼痛的发病率为 36%-60%。脉冲射频治疗此类疼痛已得到验证。在对患者进行适当选择后,脉冲射频治疗颈椎面关节可在常规临床环境下长期缓解疼痛。在选择患者时,很少讨论临床和矢状排列参数对疗效的影响。在本研究中,我们分析了来自临床数据和矢状排列参数的因素,并研究了脉冲射频治疗颈椎面关节疼痛的相关预测因素。在排除有神经症状的患者和其他混杂因素后,2015 年至 2020 年期间接受内侧支阻滞和脉冲射频治疗的颈椎面关节疼痛患者共有 204 人。根据疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表)的改善情况,将患者分为疗效好和疗效差两组。对临床和放射学数据进行了分析。多变量逻辑模型显示,预测颈椎前凸的因素包括两种方法(几率比 [OR] 0.92,95% 置信区间 [CI],C2 0.89-0.96C2-C7的Cobb角为0.89-0.96;Jackson法测量的角度为OR 0.91,95%置信区间为0.88-0.95)、颈韧带骨化、病变面关节数量、前路颈椎椎间盘切除与融合术以及前路颈椎椎间盘切除与融合术后的邻近面关节。结果表明,结果与颈椎前凸(包括两种方法)、颈韧带骨化形成、病变面关节数量、前路颈椎椎间盘切除加融合术后以及前路颈椎椎间盘切除加融合术后相邻面关节有关。C2-C7 Cobb 角的相应最佳分界点为 7°,而使用杰克逊法测量的角度为-2°,因此判定结果不佳的最佳分界点为 7°。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信