Modern contraceptive utilization among street beggar women in the Sidama region of Ethiopia using bayesian model approach.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Buzuneh Tasfa Marine, Mihiret Genene Zewde
{"title":"Modern contraceptive utilization among street beggar women in the Sidama region of Ethiopia using bayesian model approach.","authors":"Buzuneh Tasfa Marine, Mihiret Genene Zewde","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01905-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contraceptive methods are techniques used to prevent pregnancy during sexual intercourse. The primary goal of contraception is to inhibit the fertilization of an egg by sperm or to prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterus. Unwanted pregnancy is a major challenge for street beggar women. Due to limited use of modern contraception, unwanted pregnancy and STDs are key issues faced by this population. This study aims to assess modern contraceptive utilization and explore factors influencing contraceptive choices among street beggar women in the Sidama region, Ethiopia by using Bayesian logistic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted on reproductive-aged (15-49) street beggar women in the Sidama Region. Data was collected using a pre-tested, structured interview questionnaire in the local language from each town in the Sidama region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data using STATA version 17. A Bayesian logistic approach, with Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, was used to model the association between modern contraceptive utilization and independent variables, allowing for estimation of model parameters and credible intervals.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study found that 38.9% of street women in the Sidama region used modern contraceptives, primarily implants and injections. Bayesian logistic regression identified key factors influencing contraceptive use including, women aged 25-34 (AOR: 2.69 (95% CI: 1.57, 4.26)), married women (AOR: 4.91 (95% CI: 2.67, 8.51)), Widowed women (AOR: 2.81 (95% CI: 1.49)) and educated women (AOR: 2.16 (95% CI: 1.48, 3.01)) were more likely to use contraceptives. In contrast, those living on the street (AOR: 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.27)), with no history of pregnancy (AOR: 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.16)), and no sexual activity in the last six months (AOR: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03)), had lower usage rates. Additionally, women whose only job was begging (AOR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.92)) and those lacking health advice (AOR: 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.59)) also showed reduced utilization. Lack of discussion about contraceptives with partners (AOR: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.33)) and no women's approval (AOR: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.33)) further contributed to lower usage. Conversely, good knowledge of modern contraceptives was positively associated with utilization (AOR: 2.33 (95% CI: 1.44, 3.64)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study identified several factors significantly associated with modern contraceptive use among street beggar women in the Sidama region, including age, marital status, Education level, disability, Job in addition to begging, Current living situation, history of sexual assault/rape, History of pregnancy after street life, discussion of modern contraception with a sexual partner, Advice from a health professional, Sexual activity in the last six months, time taken to arrive at a health facility on foot, approval of modern contraception, and knowledge. The main barriers reported were fear of side effects and lack of knowledge about contraceptive methods. The study suggests that concerned stakeholders should intervene to address these factors and improve modern contraceptive uptake in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01905-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Contraceptive methods are techniques used to prevent pregnancy during sexual intercourse. The primary goal of contraception is to inhibit the fertilization of an egg by sperm or to prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterus. Unwanted pregnancy is a major challenge for street beggar women. Due to limited use of modern contraception, unwanted pregnancy and STDs are key issues faced by this population. This study aims to assess modern contraceptive utilization and explore factors influencing contraceptive choices among street beggar women in the Sidama region, Ethiopia by using Bayesian logistic approaches.

Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted on reproductive-aged (15-49) street beggar women in the Sidama Region. Data was collected using a pre-tested, structured interview questionnaire in the local language from each town in the Sidama region. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data using STATA version 17. A Bayesian logistic approach, with Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, was used to model the association between modern contraceptive utilization and independent variables, allowing for estimation of model parameters and credible intervals.

Result: The study found that 38.9% of street women in the Sidama region used modern contraceptives, primarily implants and injections. Bayesian logistic regression identified key factors influencing contraceptive use including, women aged 25-34 (AOR: 2.69 (95% CI: 1.57, 4.26)), married women (AOR: 4.91 (95% CI: 2.67, 8.51)), Widowed women (AOR: 2.81 (95% CI: 1.49)) and educated women (AOR: 2.16 (95% CI: 1.48, 3.01)) were more likely to use contraceptives. In contrast, those living on the street (AOR: 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.27)), with no history of pregnancy (AOR: 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.16)), and no sexual activity in the last six months (AOR: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03)), had lower usage rates. Additionally, women whose only job was begging (AOR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.92)) and those lacking health advice (AOR: 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.59)) also showed reduced utilization. Lack of discussion about contraceptives with partners (AOR: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.33)) and no women's approval (AOR: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.33)) further contributed to lower usage. Conversely, good knowledge of modern contraceptives was positively associated with utilization (AOR: 2.33 (95% CI: 1.44, 3.64)).

Conclusion: The findings of this study identified several factors significantly associated with modern contraceptive use among street beggar women in the Sidama region, including age, marital status, Education level, disability, Job in addition to begging, Current living situation, history of sexual assault/rape, History of pregnancy after street life, discussion of modern contraception with a sexual partner, Advice from a health professional, Sexual activity in the last six months, time taken to arrive at a health facility on foot, approval of modern contraception, and knowledge. The main barriers reported were fear of side effects and lack of knowledge about contraceptive methods. The study suggests that concerned stakeholders should intervene to address these factors and improve modern contraceptive uptake in this vulnerable population.

使用贝叶斯模型法研究埃塞俄比亚锡达玛地区街头乞丐妇女使用现代避孕药具的情况。
简介避孕方法是用于防止性交时怀孕的技术。避孕的主要目的是抑制精子使卵子受精或防止受精卵在子宫内着床。意外怀孕是街头乞讨妇女面临的一大挑战。由于现代避孕药具的使用有限,意外怀孕和性传播疾病是这一人群面临的主要问题。本研究旨在采用贝叶斯逻辑方法评估现代避孕药具的使用情况,并探讨影响埃塞俄比亚锡达玛地区街头乞讨妇女选择避孕药具的因素:对西达马地区育龄(15-49 岁)街头乞讨妇女进行了一项横断面定量研究。数据收集采用了一份事先经过测试的结构化访谈问卷,问卷使用当地语言,从西达马地区的每个城镇收集数据。使用 STATA 17 版对数据进行了描述性和推论性统计分析。采用贝叶斯逻辑方法和马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛方法,建立现代避孕药具使用率与自变量之间的关联模型,以估计模型参数和可信区间:研究发现,西达马地区 38.9%的街头妇女使用现代避孕药具,主要是皮下埋植剂和注射剂。贝叶斯逻辑回归确定了影响避孕药具使用的关键因素,包括 25-34 岁女性(AOR:2.69 (95% CI:1.57, 4.26))、已婚女性(AOR:4.91 (95% CI:2.67, 8.51))、丧偶女性(AOR:2.81 (95% CI:1.49))和受过教育的女性(AOR:2.16 (95% CI:1.48, 3.01))更有可能使用避孕药具。相比之下,流落街头(AOR:0.12 (95% CI:0.05, 0.27))、无怀孕史(AOR:0.07 (95% CI:0.02, 0.16))、最近六个月无性行为(AOR:0.11 (95% CI:0.01, 0.03))的妇女使用率较低。此外,以乞讨为唯一工作的妇女(AOR:0.43 (95% CI:0.13, 0.92))和缺乏健康咨询的妇女(AOR:0.25 (95% CI:0.07, 0.59))的使用率也较低。缺乏与伴侣讨论避孕药具问题(AOR:0.18 (95% CI:0.08, 0.33))和没有得到妇女的认可(AOR:0.18 (95% CI:0.08, 0.33))也是导致使用率降低的原因。相反,对现代避孕药具的充分了解与使用率呈正相关(AOR:2.33(95% CI:1.44,3.64)):本研究发现了与西达马地区街头乞讨妇女使用现代避孕药具密切相关的几个因素,包括年龄、婚姻状况、受教育程度、残疾、乞讨以外的工作、目前的生活状况、性侵犯/强奸史、街头生活后怀孕史、与性伴侣讨论现代避孕药具、卫生专业人员的建议、过去六个月的性活动、步行到达医疗机构所需的时间、对现代避孕药具的认可以及知识。所报告的主要障碍是害怕副作用和对避孕方法缺乏了解。研究建议,相关利益方应采取干预措施,消除这些因素,提高这一弱势群体对现代避孕药具的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信