Dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance explains drought resistance in zoysiagrass.

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Emma Simpson, Eduardo J Haverroth, Matthew Taggart, Moab T Andrade, Daniel A Villegas, Esdras M Carbajal, Leonardo A Oliveira, David Suchoff, Susana Milla-Lewis, Amanda A Cardoso
{"title":"Dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance explains drought resistance in zoysiagrass.","authors":"Emma Simpson, Eduardo J Haverroth, Matthew Taggart, Moab T Andrade, Daniel A Villegas, Esdras M Carbajal, Leonardo A Oliveira, David Suchoff, Susana Milla-Lewis, Amanda A Cardoso","doi":"10.1111/ppl.14622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irrigation of grasses dominates domestic water use across the globe, and better understanding of water use and drought resistance in grasses is of undeniable importance for water conservation. Breeding programs have released cultivars with improved drought resistance, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We sought to characterize the mechanisms driving drought resistance in four zoysiagrass cultivars (Lobo, Zeon, Empire, and Meyer) reported to exhibit contrasting levels of drought resistance. A dry-down was performed through deficit irrigation until 70% decline in evapotranspiration. All cultivars exhibited similar drought avoidance as they dehydrated similarly throughout the drought. Lobo and Zeon, however, exhibited a 70% decline in evapotranspiration two to three days after Empire and Meyer, thus experiencing lower water potentials. Regarding drought tolerance, Lobo and Zeon maintained higher normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and lower perceived canopy mortality at higher dehydration levels than Empire and Meyer. We use \"perceived\" because visual assessments of canopy mortality are influenced by drought-induced leaf rolling. During the recovery, leaves rehydrated and unrolled, so the \"actual\" canopy mortality could be evaluated. All cultivars exhibited similar mortality on the first recovery day despite Lobo and Zeon experiencing more severe dehydration. Throughout the recovery, Lobo and Empire exhibited faster re-growth and showed the lowest canopy mortality, and Lobo exhibited the highest NDVI. The improved drought resistance of Lobo and Zeon results from greater dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance. This study has implications for lawn owners selecting the best cultivars and for breeding programs aiming at improving drought resistance of zoysiagrasses.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"176 6","pages":"e14622"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.14622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrigation of grasses dominates domestic water use across the globe, and better understanding of water use and drought resistance in grasses is of undeniable importance for water conservation. Breeding programs have released cultivars with improved drought resistance, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We sought to characterize the mechanisms driving drought resistance in four zoysiagrass cultivars (Lobo, Zeon, Empire, and Meyer) reported to exhibit contrasting levels of drought resistance. A dry-down was performed through deficit irrigation until 70% decline in evapotranspiration. All cultivars exhibited similar drought avoidance as they dehydrated similarly throughout the drought. Lobo and Zeon, however, exhibited a 70% decline in evapotranspiration two to three days after Empire and Meyer, thus experiencing lower water potentials. Regarding drought tolerance, Lobo and Zeon maintained higher normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and lower perceived canopy mortality at higher dehydration levels than Empire and Meyer. We use "perceived" because visual assessments of canopy mortality are influenced by drought-induced leaf rolling. During the recovery, leaves rehydrated and unrolled, so the "actual" canopy mortality could be evaluated. All cultivars exhibited similar mortality on the first recovery day despite Lobo and Zeon experiencing more severe dehydration. Throughout the recovery, Lobo and Empire exhibited faster re-growth and showed the lowest canopy mortality, and Lobo exhibited the highest NDVI. The improved drought resistance of Lobo and Zeon results from greater dehydration tolerance rather than avoidance. This study has implications for lawn owners selecting the best cultivars and for breeding programs aiming at improving drought resistance of zoysiagrasses.

耐脱水而非避脱水解释了紫花苜蓿的抗旱性。
禾本科植物的灌溉在全球生活用水中占主导地位,更好地了解禾本科植物的用水和抗旱性对节水的重要性毋庸置疑。育种计划已培育出抗旱性更强的品种,但其潜在机制仍不清楚。据报道,四个紫草品种(Lobo、Zeon、Empire 和 Meyer)表现出了截然不同的抗旱性,我们试图研究这四个品种的抗旱性机理。通过亏缺灌溉进行降旱,直到蒸散量下降 70%。所有栽培品种都表现出相似的抗旱性,因为它们在整个干旱期间的脱水情况相似。但 Lobo 和 Zeon 的蒸散量在 Empire 和 Meyer 之后两到三天下降了 70%,因此水势较低。在耐旱性方面,与 Empire 和 Meyer 相比,Lobo 和 Zeon 在较高的脱水水平下仍能保持较高的归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和较低的感知冠层死亡率。我们使用 "感知 "一词,是因为树冠死亡率的目测评估受到干旱引起的叶片卷曲的影响。在恢复期间,叶片恢复水分并展开,因此可以评估 "实际 "冠层死亡率。尽管 Lobo 和 Zeon 的脱水更为严重,但所有栽培品种在恢复的第一天都表现出了相似的死亡率。在整个恢复过程中,Lobo 和 Empire 的重新生长速度更快,冠层死亡率最低,Lobo 的 NDVI 最高。Lobo 和 Zeon 抗旱性的提高源于其更强的耐脱水能力,而不是避免脱水。这项研究对草坪所有者选择最佳栽培品种以及旨在提高紫草抗旱性的育种计划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiologia plantarum
Physiologia plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信