Treatment outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in critically ill COVID-19 patients in Korea: A nationwide multicenter cohort study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Taehwa Kim, Jeong Su Kim, Min Wook So, Hye Ju Yeo, Jin Ho Jang, Onyu Park, Woo Hyun Cho
{"title":"Treatment outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in critically ill COVID-19 patients in Korea: A nationwide multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Taehwa Kim, Jeong Su Kim, Min Wook So, Hye Ju Yeo, Jin Ho Jang, Onyu Park, Woo Hyun Cho","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied by many healthcare-related issues. Concrete national data regarding the care performance of critical ill cases of COVID-19 does not exist in Korea. The current study aimed to describe the treatment outcome and healthcare resource utilization of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Our multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled critically ill COVID-19 patients from 22 tertiary care hospitals in Korea. Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged 19 years or older, (2) patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received at least one of following initial treatments such as high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. During the study wave, a total of 1358 eligible participants were enrolled, with 21 institutions participating in the study. Among them, data from 1113 patients were available and analyzed. Of 921 (82.7%), 621 (55.8%) were supported by IMV. Of the 921 patients supported by HFOT or NIV, 438 (47.6%) recovered without IMV, 429 (46.6%) required IMV, and 54 died who DNR after NIV was applied. Prone position ventilation was administered to 163 (33.1%) patients with IMV and 25 (6.2%) patients with HFOT. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was administered to 128 (20.6%) patients treated with IMV. The overall mortality rate was 26.4%. In South Korea, mortality rates for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia have been shown substantial fatality, with the highest mortality rates observed in wave 3. The increased mortality rate in wave 3 could be associated with the rapid escalation of critically ill COVID-19 patients and the consequent saturation of intensive care unit capacities. Patients received NIV therapy and prone position ventilation more frequently in wave 3 as the number of cases increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied by many healthcare-related issues. Concrete national data regarding the care performance of critical ill cases of COVID-19 does not exist in Korea. The current study aimed to describe the treatment outcome and healthcare resource utilization of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Our multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled critically ill COVID-19 patients from 22 tertiary care hospitals in Korea. Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged 19 years or older, (2) patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received at least one of following initial treatments such as high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. During the study wave, a total of 1358 eligible participants were enrolled, with 21 institutions participating in the study. Among them, data from 1113 patients were available and analyzed. Of 921 (82.7%), 621 (55.8%) were supported by IMV. Of the 921 patients supported by HFOT or NIV, 438 (47.6%) recovered without IMV, 429 (46.6%) required IMV, and 54 died who DNR after NIV was applied. Prone position ventilation was administered to 163 (33.1%) patients with IMV and 25 (6.2%) patients with HFOT. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was administered to 128 (20.6%) patients treated with IMV. The overall mortality rate was 26.4%. In South Korea, mortality rates for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia have been shown substantial fatality, with the highest mortality rates observed in wave 3. The increased mortality rate in wave 3 could be associated with the rapid escalation of critically ill COVID-19 patients and the consequent saturation of intensive care unit capacities. Patients received NIV therapy and prone position ventilation more frequently in wave 3 as the number of cases increased.

韩国 COVID-19 重症患者的治疗效果和医疗资源利用情况:全国多中心队列研究。
COVID-19 大流行伴随着许多与医疗保健相关的问题。韩国没有关于 COVID-19 重症病例护理情况的具体国家数据。本研究旨在描述 COVID-19 重症患者的治疗结果和医疗资源利用情况。我们的多中心回顾性队列研究招募了韩国 22 家三级医院的 COVID-19 重症患者。纳入标准:(1) 年龄在 19 岁或以上的患者;(2) 经实验室确诊感染了 SARS-CoV-2 并接受了以下至少一种初始治疗的患者,如高流量氧疗(HFOT)或无创通气(NIV)或有创机械通气(IMV)或体外膜氧合。在这一研究浪潮中,共有 1358 名符合条件的参与者注册,21 家机构参与了研究。其中,有 1113 名患者的数据可供分析。在 921 名(82.7%)患者中,有 621 名(55.8%)患者接受了 IMV 支持。在 921 名接受 HFOT 或 NIV 支持的患者中,438 人(47.6%)在未使用 IMV 的情况下康复,429 人(46.6%)需要使用 IMV,54 人在使用 NIV 后 DNR 死亡。163名(33.1%)患者使用了俯卧位通气,25名(6.2%)患者使用了高频通气。128 名(20.6%)接受 IMV 治疗的患者接受了体外膜肺氧合治疗。总死亡率为 26.4%。在韩国,COVID-19 重症肺炎患者的死亡率显示出很高的致死率,其中第 3 波的死亡率最高。第 3 波死亡率上升可能与 COVID-19 重症患者迅速增加以及重症监护室容量饱和有关。随着病例数的增加,患者在第 3 波更频繁地接受 NIV 治疗和俯卧位通气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信