Changes of coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Meng-Cheng Xu, Maolin Zhao
{"title":"Changes of coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI.","authors":"Meng-Cheng Xu, Maolin Zhao","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine changes in coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 419 eligible patients who underwent PPCI due to STEMI between January 2019 and September 2023 were enrolled. The corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC), final quantitative coronary angiography, and the incidence of no-reflow and slow-flow during different procedure moments were assayed. The changes in coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation in the post-dilation group were analyzed. Among the 419 patients enrolled, 259 patients underwent post-dilation. The post-dilation procedure was more frequently performed in patients with calcium plaque present, longer stents, bigger-diameter stents, and overlapping stents. The incidence of final no-reflow and slow-flow in the post-dilation group was not significantly higher than that observed in the non-post-dilation group. In contrast post-dilation patients had significantly increased CTFC values by 3.54 ± 10.54 frames (P < .001) and the rate of no-reflow/slow-flow increased on average by 114% (P < .001) in comparison to patients not undergoing post-dilation. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that if post-dilation was performed in patients when their after-stent CTFC was smaller than 23.25, no-reflow/slow-flow was less likely to occur (63.5% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity, [AUC]: 0.817, 95% CI: 0.749-0.886, P < .001). Post-dilation exacerbates the coronary blood flow and increases the incidence of no-reflow/slow-flow during PPCI for STEMI patients, except where after-stend CTFC values were <23.25.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine changes in coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 419 eligible patients who underwent PPCI due to STEMI between January 2019 and September 2023 were enrolled. The corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC), final quantitative coronary angiography, and the incidence of no-reflow and slow-flow during different procedure moments were assayed. The changes in coronary blood flow before and after post-dilation in the post-dilation group were analyzed. Among the 419 patients enrolled, 259 patients underwent post-dilation. The post-dilation procedure was more frequently performed in patients with calcium plaque present, longer stents, bigger-diameter stents, and overlapping stents. The incidence of final no-reflow and slow-flow in the post-dilation group was not significantly higher than that observed in the non-post-dilation group. In contrast post-dilation patients had significantly increased CTFC values by 3.54 ± 10.54 frames (P < .001) and the rate of no-reflow/slow-flow increased on average by 114% (P < .001) in comparison to patients not undergoing post-dilation. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that if post-dilation was performed in patients when their after-stent CTFC was smaller than 23.25, no-reflow/slow-flow was less likely to occur (63.5% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity, [AUC]: 0.817, 95% CI: 0.749-0.886, P < .001). Post-dilation exacerbates the coronary blood flow and increases the incidence of no-reflow/slow-flow during PPCI for STEMI patients, except where after-stend CTFC values were <23.25.

STEMI 患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后扩张前后冠状动脉血流的变化。
这项回顾性队列研究旨在研究ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)后进行后扩张前后冠状动脉血流的变化。在2019年1月至2023年9月期间,419名符合条件的STEMI患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。评估了心肌梗死中的校正溶栓帧计数(CTFC)、最终定量冠状动脉造影以及不同手术时刻无回流和慢流的发生率。分析了扩张后组患者扩张前后冠状动脉血流的变化。在登记的 419 名患者中,有 259 名患者接受了后扩张术。在存在钙斑块、支架较长、直径较大和支架重叠的患者中,更常进行后扩张术。扩张术后组最终无回流和慢流的发生率并没有明显高于非扩张术后组。相反,扩张后患者的 CTFC 值明显增加了 3.54 ± 10.54 帧(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信