Algofunctional outcome after intra-articular bipolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation for pain in osteoarthritis of the knee: A retrospective study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Çiğdem Yalçin, Mehmet Alper Salman, Suna Aşkin Turan, Güldane Karabakan, Harun Özmen
{"title":"Algofunctional outcome after intra-articular bipolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation for pain in osteoarthritis of the knee: A retrospective study.","authors":"Çiğdem Yalçin, Mehmet Alper Salman, Suna Aşkin Turan, Güldane Karabakan, Harun Özmen","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a paucity of research and evidence, regarding the effectiveness of applying bipolar pulsed radiofrequency (bPRF) in osteoarthritis of the knee. This study aimed to search for the impact of intra-articular bPRF (IA-bPRF) on pain, functionality, and quality of life in individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. A total of 35 patients experiencing knee pain were included in the study. IA-bPRF was applied at 42 °C temperature, 45 V, with a pulse-width of 20 ms and a frequency of 2 Hz for 3 cycles of 120 seconds. Pain severity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale. Assessment tools included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee. All measurements were made before the intervention, as well as 2 weeks and 6 months after application of IA-bPRF. Significant improvement was observed in numeric rating scale scores for walking pain from 8.57 ± 0.17 to 4.11 ± 0.35, total WOMAC scores decreased from 75.5 ± 2.71 to 36.7 ± 3.6 and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee scores decreased from 18.6 ± 0.70 to 10.4 ± 0.93 by the end of the sixth month (P < .01). WOMAC subgroups for pain, stiffness and functionality, were also significantly lower at the 2nd week and 6th month compared to pre-intervention scores (P < .01). No serious adverse events related to the procedure occurred. IA-bPRF use seems to be safe and effective in relieving pain among individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. As a result, with further research, we expect that IA-bPRF may be considered for inclusion in upcoming guidelines for the treatment of chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a paucity of research and evidence, regarding the effectiveness of applying bipolar pulsed radiofrequency (bPRF) in osteoarthritis of the knee. This study aimed to search for the impact of intra-articular bPRF (IA-bPRF) on pain, functionality, and quality of life in individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. A total of 35 patients experiencing knee pain were included in the study. IA-bPRF was applied at 42 °C temperature, 45 V, with a pulse-width of 20 ms and a frequency of 2 Hz for 3 cycles of 120 seconds. Pain severity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale. Assessment tools included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee. All measurements were made before the intervention, as well as 2 weeks and 6 months after application of IA-bPRF. Significant improvement was observed in numeric rating scale scores for walking pain from 8.57 ± 0.17 to 4.11 ± 0.35, total WOMAC scores decreased from 75.5 ± 2.71 to 36.7 ± 3.6 and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee scores decreased from 18.6 ± 0.70 to 10.4 ± 0.93 by the end of the sixth month (P < .01). WOMAC subgroups for pain, stiffness and functionality, were also significantly lower at the 2nd week and 6th month compared to pre-intervention scores (P < .01). No serious adverse events related to the procedure occurred. IA-bPRF use seems to be safe and effective in relieving pain among individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. As a result, with further research, we expect that IA-bPRF may be considered for inclusion in upcoming guidelines for the treatment of chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee.

膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛的关节内双极脉冲射频消融术后的功能结果:回顾性研究。
关于应用双极脉冲射频(bPRF)治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的效果,目前还缺乏相关的研究和证据。本研究旨在探讨关节内双极脉冲射频(IA-bPRF)对晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量的影响。研究共纳入了 35 名膝关节疼痛患者。IA-bPRF 的应用温度为 42 °C,电压为 45 V,脉宽为 20 ms,频率为 2 Hz,持续 3 个周期,每周期 120 秒。疼痛严重程度采用数字评级量表进行评估。评估工具包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和勒克斯膝关节功能指数。所有测量均在干预前以及使用 IA-bPRF 2 周和 6 个月后进行。在第六个月结束时,步行疼痛的数字评分量表得分从 8.57 ± 0.17 降至 4.11 ± 0.35,WOMAC 总分从 75.5 ± 2.71 降至 36.7 ± 3.6,膝关节的莱克纳 Algofunctional 指数从 18.6 ± 0.70 降至 10.4 ± 0.93,均有显著改善(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信