Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ivan J Huang, Grace T Baek, Jonathan Cohen, Sirin Khajaviyan, Stephanie Louie, Laura Samples, Stephen D Smith, Brian G Till, Edus H Warren, Ajay K Gopal, Christina Poh, Ryan C Lynch, Chaitra S Ujjani, Mazyar Shadman
{"title":"Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.","authors":"Ivan J Huang, Grace T Baek, Jonathan Cohen, Sirin Khajaviyan, Stephanie Louie, Laura Samples, Stephen D Smith, Brian G Till, Edus H Warren, Ajay K Gopal, Christina Poh, Ryan C Lynch, Chaitra S Ujjani, Mazyar Shadman","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Venetoclax is the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) but requires intensive monitoring for optimal safety. Clinical relevance of intensive monitoring in practice is unknown, especially for patients with low or intermediate risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical significance of monitoring for TLS during standard ramp-up for patients with CLL/SLL. Patients receiving abbreviated ramp-up, clinical trials, or concurrent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The primary end point was TLS incidence, with secondary end points describing associated clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients met study criteria. The majority of patients received venetoclax as first-line therapy (58%), with anti-CD20 antibody therapy (82%), and were at low risk of TLS (75%). No clinical TLS events occurred, whereas laboratory TLS occurred in only 1.8% of patients. No patients required antihyperuricemic therapy, and few interventions for hyperphosphatemia or hypocalcemia (3.6% of patients) were required. Additional intravenous fluids were uncommonly required (1.8% of patients), and no unplanned hospitalizations were required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support efforts to reduce intensive monitoring requirements during venetoclax ramp-up for patients with CLL, potentially increasing accessibility of venetoclax.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Venetoclax is the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) but requires intensive monitoring for optimal safety. Clinical relevance of intensive monitoring in practice is unknown, especially for patients with low or intermediate risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).

Patients and methods: A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical significance of monitoring for TLS during standard ramp-up for patients with CLL/SLL. Patients receiving abbreviated ramp-up, clinical trials, or concurrent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The primary end point was TLS incidence, with secondary end points describing associated clinical interventions.

Results: Fifty-five patients met study criteria. The majority of patients received venetoclax as first-line therapy (58%), with anti-CD20 antibody therapy (82%), and were at low risk of TLS (75%). No clinical TLS events occurred, whereas laboratory TLS occurred in only 1.8% of patients. No patients required antihyperuricemic therapy, and few interventions for hyperphosphatemia or hypocalcemia (3.6% of patients) were required. Additional intravenous fluids were uncommonly required (1.8% of patients), and no unplanned hospitalizations were required.

Conclusion: These findings support efforts to reduce intensive monitoring requirements during venetoclax ramp-up for patients with CLL, potentially increasing accessibility of venetoclax.

慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者在接受标准 Venetoclax Ramp-Up 治疗的同时接受强化实验室监测的临床意义:真实世界的经验。
目的:Venetoclax是治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)的标准疗法,但需要加强监测以获得最佳安全性。在实践中,特别是对于肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)风险较低或中等的患者,强化监测的临床意义尚不明确:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定在CLL/SLL患者标准升速过程中监测TLS的临床意义。不包括接受简短升速治疗、临床试验或同时使用布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的患者。主要终点是TLS发生率,次要终点是相关的临床干预措施:55名患者符合研究标准。大多数患者接受了venetoclax一线治疗(58%)和抗CD20抗体治疗(82%),TLS风险较低(75%)。没有发生临床 TLS 事件,仅有 1.8% 的患者发生实验室 TLS。没有患者需要进行抗高尿酸血症治疗,极少数患者(3.6%)需要进行高磷血症或低钙血症干预。需要额外静脉输液的情况并不多见(1.8% 的患者),没有患者需要意外住院:这些研究结果支持在CLL患者接受Venetoclax治疗期间减少强化监测要求的努力,从而有可能提高Venetoclax的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信