Precision Structuring of Free-Text Surgical Record for Enhanced Stroke Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S486449
Mengfei Wang, Jianyong Wei, Yao Zeng, Lisong Dai, Bicong Yan, Yueqi Zhu, Xiaoer Wei, Yidong Jin, Yuehua Li
{"title":"Precision Structuring of Free-Text Surgical Record for Enhanced Stroke Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models.","authors":"Mengfei Wang, Jianyong Wei, Yao Zeng, Lisong Dai, Bicong Yan, Yueqi Zhu, Xiaoer Wei, Yidong Jin, Yuehua Li","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S486449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MTB) is a critical procedure for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. However, the free-text format of MTB surgical records limits the formulation of effective postoperative patient management and rehabilitation plans. This study compares the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in structuring data from these free-text MTB surgical record.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study collected a total of 382 MTB surgical records from a tertiary hospital. An initial analysis of 30 surgical record from these records provided a guiding prompt for LLMs, focusing on basic and advanced characteristics, such as occlusion locations, thrombectomy maneuvers, reperfusion status, and intraoperative complications. Six LLMs-ChatGPT, GPT-4, GeminiPro, ChatGLM4, Spark3, and QwenMax-were assessed against data extracted by neuroradiologists and a junior physician for comparison. The all 382 surgical records were used to test the performance of LLMs. The performance of the LLMs was quantified using Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, AUC, and MSE as an additional metric for advanced characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All LLMs showed high performance in characteristic extraction, achieving an average accuracy of 95.09 ± 4.98% across 48 items, and 78.05 ± 4.2% overall. GLM4 and GPT-4 were most accurate in advanced characteristics extraction, with accuracies of 84.03% and 82.20%, respectively. The processing time for LLMs averaged 73.10 ± 10.86 seconds of six models, significantly faster than the 427.88 seconds for manual extraction by physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLMs, particularly GLM4 and GPT-4, efficiently and accurately structured both general and advanced characteristics from MTB surgical record, outperforming manual extraction methods and demonstrating potential for enhancing clinical data management in AIS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5163-5175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S486449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MTB) is a critical procedure for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. However, the free-text format of MTB surgical records limits the formulation of effective postoperative patient management and rehabilitation plans. This study compares the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in structuring data from these free-text MTB surgical record.

Methods: This retrospective study collected a total of 382 MTB surgical records from a tertiary hospital. An initial analysis of 30 surgical record from these records provided a guiding prompt for LLMs, focusing on basic and advanced characteristics, such as occlusion locations, thrombectomy maneuvers, reperfusion status, and intraoperative complications. Six LLMs-ChatGPT, GPT-4, GeminiPro, ChatGLM4, Spark3, and QwenMax-were assessed against data extracted by neuroradiologists and a junior physician for comparison. The all 382 surgical records were used to test the performance of LLMs. The performance of the LLMs was quantified using Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, AUC, and MSE as an additional metric for advanced characteristics.

Results: All LLMs showed high performance in characteristic extraction, achieving an average accuracy of 95.09 ± 4.98% across 48 items, and 78.05 ± 4.2% overall. GLM4 and GPT-4 were most accurate in advanced characteristics extraction, with accuracies of 84.03% and 82.20%, respectively. The processing time for LLMs averaged 73.10 ± 10.86 seconds of six models, significantly faster than the 427.88 seconds for manual extraction by physicians.

Conclusion: LLMs, particularly GLM4 and GPT-4, efficiently and accurately structured both general and advanced characteristics from MTB surgical record, outperforming manual extraction methods and demonstrating potential for enhancing clinical data management in AIS treatment.

精确构建自由文本手术记录以加强卒中管理:大型语言模型的比较评估。
简介:机械血栓切除术(MTB)是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的关键手术。然而,MTB 手术记录的自由文本格式限制了有效的术后患者管理和康复计划的制定。本研究比较了大语言模型(LLM)在构建这些自由文本 MTB 手术记录数据方面的功效:这项回顾性研究共收集了一家三级医院的 382 份 MTB 手术记录。对这些记录中的 30 份手术记录进行的初步分析为 LLM 提供了指导性提示,重点关注基本和高级特征,如闭塞位置、血栓切除术操作、再灌注状态和术中并发症。六种 LLM--ChatGPT、GPT-4、GeminiPro、ChatGLM4、Spark3 和 QwenMax 与神经放射科医生和一名初级医生提取的数据进行了对比评估。所有 382 份手术记录都用于测试 LLM 的性能。使用准确性、灵敏度、特异性、AUC 和 MSE 作为高级特征的附加指标来量化 LLM 的性能:所有 LLM 在特征提取方面都表现出很高的性能,48 个项目的平均准确率为 95.09 ± 4.98%,总体准确率为 78.05 ± 4.2%。GLM4 和 GPT-4 在高级特征提取方面最为准确,准确率分别为 84.03% 和 82.20%。在六个模型中,LLMs 的处理时间平均为 73.10 ± 10.86 秒,明显快于医生手工提取的 427.88 秒:结论:LLMs,尤其是 GLM4 和 GPT-4,能高效、准确地从 MTB 手术记录中结构化出一般特征和高级特征,优于人工提取方法,显示了在 AIS 治疗中加强临床数据管理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信